Home

° About David
° Professional profile
° About this blog
Recent Articles
Buyer Beware
The Right to Sponsor
The Game is Rigged
What Not to Wear
On Recognizing Foreign Credentials
What's Wrong with This Picture?
The Times They Are A-Changin' (Bob Dylan, 1964)
Charles Darwin on Canadian Immigration
New Beginnings
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied
Canada Immigration Newsletter
Register to receive the monthly Canada Immigration Newsletter!
|Learn More| Latest Edition|
Canada Immigration Eligibility Questionnaire
Submit your Canadian Immigration Eligibility Questionnaire and find out if you qualify. We will email your personalized results to you within 24 hours. This service is provided for FREE.
Monthly Archive

Why All the Secrecy?

July 30, 2007

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously said, "Sunlight is the best disinfectant." He meant that openness and transparency are fundamental elements of a true democracy. As Canadians, we pride ourselves on the strength of our democracy and the rights which are enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Recent events have brought rights and democracy in Canada into question.

Background - In 2005, the heads of state of Canada, U.S.A. and Mexico launched the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) with the goal of enhancing security and increasing prosperity in North America. Hard to argue against a safer and more prosperous North America, you would think. Except that the leaders take no advice from their peoples' elected representatives. Instead, they receive input only from representatives of North America's corporate elite on ways to achieve continental economic integration. The top politicians of the three North American countries have been meeting privately with members of corporate industry to discuss a wide variety of topics, including energy, health, immigration and cross-border trade.

Until recently, a lack of publicity meant the meetings of the SPP have gone largely unnoticed by the general public. But earlier this month the SPP came into the light when the Council of Canadians, a concerned group of left-leaning progressive citizens, was denied a permit to hold a public forum near the site of an upcoming SPP meeting, which will be held in Canada in August 2007.

The Council paid a $100 deposit to rent the community centre in Papineauville, Quebec, about six kilometers from the site of the SPP meeting. The proposed public forum had been scheduled to take place a few days before the upcoming meeting between U.S. President George W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon. The Council of Canadians was informed that Canadian police and the US Army (you read that right!) would not allow the rental of the community centre because of security concerns.

The last time I checked, Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights assured the fundamental freedoms of peaceful assembly, association, thought and expression to all Canadians. The Council of Canadians, which refuses donations from government and corporations, has worked for over 20 years to peacefully promote its policies on fair trade, clean water, energy security, public health care, and other issues of social and economic concern to Canadians. They are an integral part to a healthy democracy, giving a voice to a side of debate that is not promoted by government or business. The Council speaks for many Canadians when it voices concerns about the establishment of a North American security perimeter and a continental resource pact. In refusing to allow the Council to meet in Papineauville, the authorities are sending a message that suppresses the fundamental rights of Canadians.

It bothers me that the North American heads of state are discussing the future of Canada and its sovereignty in secret. The elected leaders have an obligation to make their dialogue public. On its website, the SPP says it is acting with the best interests of North Americans at heart. But the real question is whose interests are being served? Who is speaking for the interests of ordinary Canadians? And while I applaud efforts to increase quality of life and prosperity in Canada, Mexico and the U.S.A, such changes should not come at the expense of democracy and open debate. As Canadians, we don't like it when our government does things behind closed doors.

Hopefully, further media attention will cast "sunlight" onto meetings of the SPP so that all citizens can be informed and have their voices heard. In future blogs, I hope to further discuss the SPP and its impact on Canada.

 

 

2 Comments:

 

 

At August 01, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello, Neighbor to the north!
As a citizen of the U.S. I have become more and more dismayed and upset about the course my country has taken. My suggestion to Canadians is very simple: Stay on top of your government. A democracy is only as good as the people running it. It seems here that we became complacent and look what we have to show for it! Don't let them get away with "secret meetings" Defend your rights, or they could be taken from you. Good Luck!
KS in Washington state

 
At August 10, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It was only a couple of months ago, when I first heard of the SPP. At first I dismissed it as merely some extension of NAFTA, nothing more. But then I did a deep research on the SPP. Now, I have come to the conclusion it is a far more ambitious program driven by "business interests". While I still unsure about the scope and nature of the SPP's agenda, I am being to see the coordination and integration of various agencies of the Canada, Mexico and United States is not based on national interests, or the interests of the citizens. The agenda of the SPP seem to aim merely at enhancing a North American environment for the reckless dominance of corporate influence in domestic and foreign policies of the "partnership" nations.

What is even more disturbing, at least here in the United States, is the involvement of Homeland Security in SPP. In a move towards transparent borders as suggested by the principles of the SPP, there is a effort to create a vast database of personal information of citizens under the United States jurisdiction. Just recently, under the pretext of dealing with illegal immigration, Chertoff of the Homeland Security asked all states to turn over copies of all driver license photos and information.

Normally there would be a general outrage at such an audacious move by the government. But as you point out, there is a great deal of secrecy surrounding SPP. There is no real information about SPP in our media nor does the United States government attempt to inform its citizens of this wide ranging initiative. The secrecy does great harm to the relationship between citizen and the constitutionally elected government. Worse of all, without public debate of the SPP, there will be no guarantees that their "interests", the "interests" of the citizen will be protected .

It is good for individuals such as yourself, and all others, to speak out loud and clear for ending the cloak of secrecy surrounding the SPP. No government has the right to conduct public business, without public knowledge.


Good work Canadian.

 

Post a Comment

 

<< Blog Main Page