Hey said:
Again the same answer, no it was not for C4 that was Sen Ho amendment in regards the minor right to apply for citizenship
pls. stop confusing people
Bill C-6: Senate stage
- Thread starter marcher
- Start date
Again the same answer, no it was not for C4 that was Sen Ho amendment in regards the minor right to apply for citizenship
pls. stop confusing people
Hey said:
No, they will start the debate on C-6 3rd reading as announced by the speaker, but you never know another Sen. may rise with a new amendment we have to wait and see
Hey said:
I'm not an expert but i don't think so, if there was any amendment to the amendment it should have been represented before the vote like what happened to Sen. Mccoy amendment when there was a translation error
I was driving and missed the vote. Minors amendment passed?
Checked the last few pages, no one mentioned it.
Checked the last few pages, no one mentioned it.
I was following this for weeks, and don't know where it is heading. There is no limit on imaginations turning into amendments without proper research and this can continue forever.
I don't know why they want to make C6 perfect.. it can't happen..
I don't know why they want to make C6 perfect.. it can't happen..
spyfy said:
https://twitter.com/SenJaffer/status/851936675571912705
maybe 2 more amendments to come,
For negative members who are spreading their negativity that these new amendments will not be accepted by HoC
Please note that today sen Harder thanked the senates for all the new amendments that are being introduced and for the ones to come, all these valuable amendments will be passed by HoC
MTweet12 said:
Thanks. Sen. Jaffer is guessing 2 more amendments are coming.
I'm most interested in the residency requirement amendment, wonder what that will entail.
https://twitter.com/SenJaffer/status/851936675571912705
MTweet12 said:
The government had clearly specified that they were only open to the amendment that deals with fair process .
Now they are repealing a law that has not been passed yet ..trying to be superheroes.
Sen jaffer and others wanted this bill to pass faster by not amending it at committee stage ( worst call ever ) and insisted on the revocation/fair process/appeal process amendment , and that it'd be the only one they will focus and yet she voted FOR the amendment . If it was properly amended at committee stage , the bill wouldn't be where it is right now .
We have a record of 9 sittings for C4 and 8 sittings for C6 , those two bills will probably break all records .