My Thai GF's visa was rejected. 3 reasons - travel history, family ties, purpose of visit
Travel history - her only travels have been to Korea, Singapore and Indonesia. Is that not good enough? I would have thought Korea and Singapore would be considered "sufficiently desirable"
Family ties: she has no family ties in Canada, all her ties are in Thailand (her parents are elderly and she supports them).
Purpose of visit: we selected "tourism" Is this wrong? SHould it be visit? Really don't get this. She is coming to Canada for a 2 WEEK vacation!!!
The thing about my GF is that she has a good job, owns her own home and 2 other properties, has her own car, no debt, she is totally self-sufficient. Because of this I did not include any of my own financial statements because I am not supporting her. So I feel its irrelevant. Was this a mistake?
In other words she has nothing to gain by staying in Canada, but rather has a lot to lose (she would lose her job, her financial independence, her family, she would have no right to work in canada).
She also has a return flight ticket - I assume it was appropriate to include this?
Comments/suggestions please?
Travel history - her only travels have been to Korea, Singapore and Indonesia. Is that not good enough? I would have thought Korea and Singapore would be considered "sufficiently desirable"
Family ties: she has no family ties in Canada, all her ties are in Thailand (her parents are elderly and she supports them).
Purpose of visit: we selected "tourism" Is this wrong? SHould it be visit? Really don't get this. She is coming to Canada for a 2 WEEK vacation!!!
The thing about my GF is that she has a good job, owns her own home and 2 other properties, has her own car, no debt, she is totally self-sufficient. Because of this I did not include any of my own financial statements because I am not supporting her. So I feel its irrelevant. Was this a mistake?
In other words she has nothing to gain by staying in Canada, but rather has a lot to lose (she would lose her job, her financial independence, her family, she would have no right to work in canada).
She also has a return flight ticket - I assume it was appropriate to include this?
Comments/suggestions please?