Some people reported increments in their profiles right before the draw happened. And they subsequently received the invitations.
Maybe they're from HongKong? There has been a recent prioritization for HK immigrants right?
Some people reported increments in their profiles right before the draw happened. And they subsequently received the invitations.
I believe additional points have been officially given to people with Canadian experience.Maybe they're from HongKong? There has been a recent prioritization for HK immigrants right?
I have 1 year canadian work experience and 2 years canadian education, there's nothing changed in my profile. Still sitting at 466, Should I smile?I believe additional points have been officially given to people with Canadian experience.
Idk abt this situation but the profile like that should score 500. I checked from other website's calculators, so they wont have the update yet in case ircc did give more score, and the results are all 500 with this profile. My guess is that he created the profile at the exact time when there was a glitch with the system, rmb the canadian exp, and he received 465, then the system was fixed and it gave him the right scoreMaybe they're from HongKong? There has been a recent prioritization for HK immigrants right?
Mention masters in degree and bachelors in ECA field.. just add a point in LOE that the system is considering the wrong field for computing scores in eAPR. This is a glitch in the systemHi Guys for filling up the profile post ITA, I was trying to complete the education part. There are two fields. One which asks which degree you completed and the other about the ECA evaluation. So I got a bachelor's for my master's and I put it that way but on preview my score, it jumped to a higher score. Should I keep both as bachelor's? But in that case, the degree I submit will have masters written on it.
Ok, thanks!Mention masters in degree and bachelors in ECA field.. just add a point in LOE that the system is considering the wrong field for computing scores in eAPR. This is a glitch in the system
Yea, very shocking. I was expecting it to drop to 468 at least! CanPR predicted 466-468.How can it be 375 ppl per day? All the 471 and above were cleared last time, so they are all new ppl entering 471-1200 range, there are3345+413= 3758 ppl with 471 and above in the last 2 weeks. So its 268 candidates per day, pretty much less compared to the few last draws.
On the #169, what insane is the number of ppl who were already in the pool that boosted their score to 469, it drags the tie breaking rule back to june
Good luck! One thing which this whole process definitely teaches you is patience.Damn my first ITA. There's a long road ahead now for gathering the submission documents & waiting to hear back from them. It is going to be difficult and now the reality of finding a suitable job in Canada hits!!
This draw is great news not just to everyone who got the ITA, but also to those who are seeking to understand the pool inflow in two weeks.
Finally we have the backlog of several months fully cleared till 469. If we get a draw now after two weeks, we’ll see exactly what the two week inflow data is, without having to account for backlogs and other matters.
Here's the math:How can it be 375 ppl per day? All the 471 and above were cleared last time, so they are all new ppl entering 471-1200 range, there are3345+413= 3758 ppl with 471 and above in the last 2 weeks. So its 268 candidates per day, pretty much less compared to the few last draws.
On the #169, what insane is the number of ppl who were already in the pool that boosted their score to 469, it drags the tie breaking rule back to june
Oh ok, I thought that you calculated only the 471-1200 range, cause thats the only range showed on ur tableHere's the math:
(10848-(12007-(5000-2174-185))+3345+413)/14
10848 = number of people in the 461-470 range on draw 169
12007 = number of people in the 461-470 range on draw 168
For the draws that had cutoffs higher than 471, I calculated only the 471-600 range.Oh ok, I thought that you calculated only the 471-1200 range, cause thats the only range showed on ur table