+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
R10 is the initial document check. usually passes at the same time as your medical passes. If R10 doesnt pass, the app is refused as incomplete and you get *all* your fees back. so if you passed medical, you passed R10.
I think now this is not happening correctly after 4 months i have seen lot of applications rejected recently
 
what document was missing? there must have been a serious mistake at various stages by many officers if it passed R10 (completeness check) and Eligibility with a missing document and then got rejected. (if you have the link much better).

I think i know the case youre talking about -- was it a missing LOE for a job experience from the applicant? If so there were mutliple mistakes at many stages and it shouldnt have passed R10 -- that was an extremely unlikely case, so dont lose your sleep over it.
i hope so it sholdn't be the the issue. yes missing job description not aligning with NOC code.
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-i...-during-covid-19.694193/page-223#post-9612165
 
i hope so it sholdn't be the the issue. yes missing job description not aligning with NOC code.
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-i...-during-covid-19.694193/page-223#post-9612165

Thats different. The documents were complete (R10 passed) but the reference letter did not have the duties to match the noc code, so the officer couldnt verify work exp with wrong job duties.

So the letter was there. The file was refused at the eligibility stage (could not verify job exp with due to noc code mismatch). So their eligibility was never passed before, or had 'review required'
 
at the tome of eligibility only it rejected for her and its more than 4 months at thatbtime so R10 check don’t know what they done at that time

R10 checks that documents are submitted.
Eligibility actually checks the contents of the docs and verified job exp.

So in that case, the letter was there, but the letter could not confirm the noc code (did not have enough job duties or none).
R10 passed as docs were complete. Eligibility did not pass as letter could not confirm job exp.
If you passed eligibility, this will *not* happen
 
Thats different. The documents were complete (R10 passed) but the reference letter did not have the duties to match the noc code, so the officer couldnt verify work exp with wrong job duties.

So the letter was there. The file was refused at the eligibility stage (could not verify job exp with due to noc code mismatch). So their eligibility was never passed before, or had 'review required'
check the comment from the same person eligibility was passed before and then later it got rejected by Edmonton vo
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-i...ndent-outland-during-covid-19.694193/page-224
 
Looks like theres a bit or confusion between R10 (intial document check) and Eligibility.

R10 checks that you submitted all your documents and that theyre complete in their given placeholders.

Eligibility actually verifies the contents and reviews whether what you said actually makes you eligible for the class you applied for (CEC in our cases).

As far as R10 is concerned, your reference letter for work exp could just say 'applicant works at starbucks' and nothing else. R10 will mark it as complete.

For eligibility, the officer will actually review the letter, check whether its a real job, whether the Noc code is 0 A or B and whether the job duties you performed match the ones in the noc code.
If your letter is missing duties, officer wont be able to verify you actually performed the job. If your duties allign better to a different noc code, it will also be marked as a red flag. Both of these cases will get your eligibility = not met if removing the job exp takes you under the lowest scoring crs invitee, or if it was your only work exp and now you have none.

Hope this helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huxing0522
like the other said -- contact your MP. response will take 3-5days
Let’s discuss one of my another situation .how I can calculate my six months of processing or further.

I done my upfront medical on 15 dec 2020 n my dependents did it on 12 dec 2020.I submitted my file on 28 jan 2021 but my husband got email on 7 jan 2021 from health department Canada for my further tests.as he is dependent applicant he did not check his mail so I did not go for further tests .

I submitted my file on 28 jan 2021 with up front medical n I got biometric request on 23 feb 2021 but my medical did not updated .in may by chance I visited my panel physician to ask abt my medical as I did not get any call from them as well as I did not get email as a PA for further tests .so I went for further tests in may n my medical passed on 11 may2021.

so I have to calculate my application processing time from may 2021 or wat.y I did not get mail for further tests .y they send it to dependents Emil id which we just checked ltr by chance .is that reason for delay.
 
Looks like theres a bit or confusion between R10 (intial document check) and Eligibility.

R10 checks that you submitted all your documents and that theyre complete in their given placeholders.

Eligibility actually verifies the contents and reviews whether what you said actually makes you eligible for the class you applied for (CEC in our cases).

As far as R10 is concerned, your reference letter for work exp could just say 'applicant works at starbucks' and nothing else. R10 will mark it as complete.

For eligibility, the officer will actually review the letter, check whether its a real job, whether the Noc code is 0 A or B and whether the job duties you performed match the ones in the noc code.
If your letter is missing duties, officer wont be able to verify you actually performed the job. If your duties allign better to a different noc code, it will also be marked as a red flag. Both of these cases will get your eligibility = not met if removing the job exp takes you under the lowest scoring crs invitee, or if it was your only work exp and now you have none.

Hope this helps.
Thanks it really help!
I would still feel for the above case he was bit unlucky as it got rejected after eligibility was passed as he said he got rejected in the final decision
 
Thanks it really help!
I would still feel for the above case he was bit unlucky as it got rejected after eligibility was passed as he said he got rejected in the final decision
It does sound unlucky but i feel theres more to the story. Maybe the applicant claimed points for having a job offer. The job 'offer', required very specific wording and is one of the highest reasons for refusals if the wording is off.

But again, if you check your reference letter and it has no such issues and you also submitted paychecks and tax returns as extra proof, and you did not claim a job offer (less stuff to verify) theres almost no chanced of refusal after eligibility passed (somehow i doubt eligibility passed, as call centre agents are not all good, maybe it was recommended passed but not fully passed by a senior officer).

You know its fully passed and have nothing to worry if your security started (it will be blank on your gcms instead of 'not started).
 
It does sound unlucky but i feel theres more to the story. Maybe the applicant claimed points for having a job offer. The job 'offer', required very specific wording and is one of the highest reasons for refusals if the wording is off.

But again, if you check your reference letter and it has no such issues and you also submitted paychecks and tax returns as extra proof, and you did not claim a job offer (less stuff to verify) theres almost no chanced of refusal after eligibility passed (somehow i doubt eligibility passed, as call centre agents are not all good, maybe it was recommended passed but not fully passed by a senior officer).

You know its fully passed and have nothing to worry if your security started (it will be blank on your gcms instead of 'not started).
U are making me tense as I claimed job offer’s point .