@ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
- Thread starter longwaitwithrq
- Start date
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
I have been short of approx. 180 days of the physical requirement at the time of applying which I mentioned in the application as it was due to business trips. I am into export business so had to travel few countries intermittently. Whereas my wife completed all days and was above 1250 days at the time of application.
I applied in 2013 as family application, after submitting questionnaire and waiting almost 26 months and 2 times finger prints got test which we both passed. The officer at mississauga said that it will be referred to the CJ.
Any Idea how much time as now both of us are stuck and in is uncertain about the timeframe.
I have been short of approx. 180 days of the physical requirement at the time of applying which I mentioned in the application as it was due to business trips. I am into export business so had to travel few countries intermittently. Whereas my wife completed all days and was above 1250 days at the time of application.
I applied in 2013 as family application, after submitting questionnaire and waiting almost 26 months and 2 times finger prints got test which we both passed. The officer at mississauga said that it will be referred to the CJ.
Any Idea how much time as now both of us are stuck and in is uncertain about the timeframe.
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
I have been short of approx. 180 days of the physical requirement at the time of applying which I mentioned in the application as it was due to business trips. I am into export business so had to travel few countries intermittently. Whereas my wife completed all days and was above 1250 days at the time of application.
I applied in 2013 as family application, after submitting questionnaire and waiting almost 26 months and 2 times finger prints got test which we both passed. The officer at mississauga said that it will be referred to the CJ.
Any Idea how much time as now both of us are stuck and in is uncertain about the timeframe. Is it wise to withdraw the application and then restart all over again? I heard that the wait time for CJ appointment is much more then the actual processing time?
I have been short of approx. 180 days of the physical requirement at the time of applying which I mentioned in the application as it was due to business trips. I am into export business so had to travel few countries intermittently. Whereas my wife completed all days and was above 1250 days at the time of application.
I applied in 2013 as family application, after submitting questionnaire and waiting almost 26 months and 2 times finger prints got test which we both passed. The officer at mississauga said that it will be referred to the CJ.
Any Idea how much time as now both of us are stuck and in is uncertain about the timeframe. Is it wise to withdraw the application and then restart all over again? I heard that the wait time for CJ appointment is much more then the actual processing time?
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
not sure what made u presume that being employed in exports (unless you are employed by EDC or any other government institution) would exempt you from residency requirements ? I think the judge would need to decide on this issue based on your case so if you qualify under the new rule maybe you should ponder on possibilities of fresh application because from what it seems lately the judges are going strictly by the physical presence requirements. If you are lucky your case might come up for hearing sooner rather then later, I wish you good luck. In case you decide on a fresh application do make the application based on cic requirements not based on presumptions as that would lead you to another non routine application and another long wait.
For sure a Level 2 officer is not qualified do decide on your case, so would suggest to post your query in a more appropriate thread to get the right suggestions.
Exports said:
not sure what made u presume that being employed in exports (unless you are employed by EDC or any other government institution) would exempt you from residency requirements ? I think the judge would need to decide on this issue based on your case so if you qualify under the new rule maybe you should ponder on possibilities of fresh application because from what it seems lately the judges are going strictly by the physical presence requirements. If you are lucky your case might come up for hearing sooner rather then later, I wish you good luck. In case you decide on a fresh application do make the application based on cic requirements not based on presumptions as that would lead you to another non routine application and another long wait.
For sure a Level 2 officer is not qualified do decide on your case, so would suggest to post your query in a more appropriate thread to get the right suggestions.
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
6 Months will be a hard sell in front of judge. Suggest, cancelling app and re-applying as your best course of option
Exports said:
6 Months will be a hard sell in front of judge. Suggest, cancelling app and re-applying as your best course of option
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
check also on option if any of changing from family application to splitting it into individual application because maybe your wife's application doesnt merit a cj hearing and can be decided by a citizenship officer as she has fulfilled the physical residency requirement, again post in an appropriate thread so that you could get a more thoughtful response.
vinaypuri said:
check also on option if any of changing from family application to splitting it into individual application because maybe your wife's application doesnt merit a cj hearing and can be decided by a citizenship officer as she has fulfilled the physical residency requirement, again post in an appropriate thread so that you could get a more thoughtful response.
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
Hi walrus1891, Just checked my mail and ecase, it is not showing any oath info. So definitely it is not going to Missi for me. It might go to Scarborough since i took test there.
DM was made on Friday.
walrus1891 said:
Hi walrus1891, Just checked my mail and ecase, it is not showing any oath info. So definitely it is not going to Missi for me. It might go to Scarborough since i took test there.
DM was made on Friday.
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
I am thinking just call in and book an oath ceremony. Let them know your availability and you have been practicing how to take the ceremony at home. Shame on them. LOL
vinaypuri said:
I am thinking just call in and book an oath ceremony. Let them know your availability and you have been practicing how to take the ceremony at home. Shame on them. LOL
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
Lol.. Strawberry lemonade.. That was chucke of the day.. Thanks.
you are funny
strawberrylemonade said:
Lol.. Strawberry lemonade.. That was chucke of the day.. Thanks.
you are funny
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
Another week passed. No news from CIC!. Any luck folks? or is CIC is practically on summer break.
Another week passed. No news from CIC!. Any luck folks? or is CIC is practically on summer break.
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
I called them friday, they refused to check my file, told them 3 months since decision made, they said it can take upto 6 months, the wait continues.........
vinaypuri said:
I called them friday, they refused to check my file, told them 3 months since decision made, they said it can take upto 6 months, the wait continues.........
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
They are not on summer break necessarily . They are just busy making sure that 2015 applicants get their oaths within six months while under-privileged , un-entitled and second grade group of 2011-2013 RQ applicants are waiting on the sidelines. I guess each tax dollar payed by a 2015 applicant worth more than a tax dollar payed by a 2012 applicant ( maybe people who applied in 2015 pay their taxes in US $
)
vinaypuri said:
They are not on summer break necessarily . They are just busy making sure that 2015 applicants get their oaths within six months while under-privileged , un-entitled and second grade group of 2011-2013 RQ applicants are waiting on the sidelines. I guess each tax dollar payed by a 2015 applicant worth more than a tax dollar payed by a 2012 applicant ( maybe people who applied in 2015 pay their taxes in US $
)Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
Tell them you got a call from CIC saying that you need to call back and book a oath ceremony (scam is everywhere nowadays, so you can always get away with that). They will spend more time with you and check your file, because they "think" you are a victim and they would like to help.
Reply with a disappoint saying: "Oh man, that must had been a scam!" you got your info, they feel accomplished, everyone is happy in the picture.
longwaitwithrq said:
Tell them you got a call from CIC saying that you need to call back and book a oath ceremony (scam is everywhere nowadays, so you can always get away with that). They will spend more time with you and check your file, because they "think" you are a victim and they would like to help.
Reply with a disappoint saying: "Oh man, that must had been a scam!" you got your info, they feel accomplished, everyone is happy in the picture.
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
Yeah. RQ applicants are just not on the priority. It is a BAD cycle. They will never get to RQ people with this kind of logic.
ItkExpert said:They are not on summer break necessarily . They are just busy making sure that 2015 applicants get their oaths within six months while under-privileged , un-entitled and second grade group of 2011-2013 RQ applicants are waiting on the sidelines. I guess each tax dollar payed by a 2015 applicant worth more than a tax dollar payed by a 2012 applicant ( maybe people who applied in 2015 pay their taxes in US $
Yeah. RQ applicants are just not on the priority. It is a BAD cycle. They will never get to RQ people with this kind of logic.
Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker
Please feel free to try it for yourself, I am not so desperate to jinx my case file after waiting for almost 3 years.
strawberrylemonade said:
Please feel free to try it for yourself, I am not so desperate to jinx my case file after waiting for almost 3 years.
Similar threads
