SPOUSAL Sponsorship PAKISTAN @ London Visa Office
- Thread starter TooCareless1
- Start date
@Social_Distancing isnt making this UP!
Can you stop it with your blind denial of the reality already? A while back I wrote This happened to me too in my gcms and you told me that im making it up too!
They DO Censor gcms notes if there are things in there (other than security/criminal) that would give an applicant an advantage in processing.
I would like to say that they released all the censored material in my case once the interview letter was sent to us.
If Censoring info during an application in progress was against the law, I am sure ircc would not practice anything illegal such as this routine censorship. Therefore "complaining" to Ombudsman about a standard legal gcms protocol would be a waste if time.
Not an ideal scenario but I wonder if its worth it to withdraw and reapply given you haven't received pre-arrival yet either and you're a Jan 2019 applicant. This may work better and you may be able to put a stronger case together this time especially if you have spent significant time with your spouse together in person, supported them financially, length proof of communication, gifts etc.
I'm not a lawyer or an expert but just a last resort idea... 32 months with no movement is rough.
Look closely in Officer' NOTES section- are there any blank spaces between words and does there seem to sentences which are cut off as if a grammar mistake? If so, and if the paragraph seems like it was broken not continuous like a proper style of writing...anything suspicious would indicate that the material was CENSORED OUT so to keep you in the dark until the last moment (interview, PFL, etc).
They are LIVING together OUTLAND.
In such cases ircc is trying to severe our ties with Canada and refuse based on non intent to return. They know they cannot get her on non genuine clause, so they are adjusting their game plan accordingly.
Withdrawing and reapplying is a really bad move in such a situation because it only strengthens ircv position that sponsor has given up on Canada. Reaplying will only end up in the same place.
Like I said before, do it or stop talking about it - contact the access to information ombudsman. You're sure it's not a problem and a waste of time, but haven't done anything about it. At least you'd get an answer whether this is in fact allowable.
Did you get the copy with the previously blacked-out material? (Would like to say = would like to but cannot? What does it mean?)
I cant do shit now cuz 60 days have long expired.
Why I should not talk about it, if it happens all the time?
Because you don't have much credibility, have a tendency to paranoia/persecution complex, claim things that aren't true and can't seem to provide specific evidence here or with some of your other claims.
Or sure, talk about it - and I'll continue to say "if someone believes that, they should report it to the access to info ombudsman." Since no-one ever seems to - unproven.
^^^^^Paranoia.
Strongly doubt IRCC cares about any file enough to carry out a bizarre scheme like this, that could easily be appealed.
Yeah, Yesterday two March 2021 Applicants Got Medical Request.
Review of additional documents
- Not applicable.
Hi,
I received AOR2 for my case in June but my PA ECAS never got the "We are processing" line 2. It only shows line 1 "We received the application on date x."
Is it normal sometimes line 2 never shows up? I notice most people get that before they receive AOR2 so I just assumed they didn't update ECAS but the application is in active processing.
I received AOR2 for my case in June but my PA ECAS never got the "We are processing" line 2. It only shows line 1 "We received the application on date x."
Is it normal sometimes line 2 never shows up? I notice most people get that before they receive AOR2 so I just assumed they didn't update ECAS but the application is in active processing.