BLT said:
The worst part is that those who got it after 24 months or even 40 months, would feel that they have less obligation to the country than those who got it in 6 months.
IMO, I agree that CIC shouldn't process the application like fast food restaurant : first come first served, because every application is unique on it's own, but the gap shouldn't be that long, like 6 months compared to 36 months. It won't take 30 months to review an application. CRA could review your business invoices and transactions plus secrets (much more complicated) in just few weeks. Maybe if CRA is processing the citizenship application, the processing time would be comparable to Australia : 3 months maximum. ;D
I disagree, actually.
The Citizenship process is dirt simple, and could be simplified still. Remember the only relevant parts are PR date and physical presence since that date. Of semi-relevance is proof of language, but that could also be established in the testing / interview part of the process.
They should start by simplifying the form -- there's no need to request employment nor education history.
Next, they look at each case on its face, cross-referencing CBSA records. If the application appears valid and correct, it's sent to the testing / interview process.
Which brings the next point -- the testing process should be able to be done in a similar manner to one's learners license test for driving -- an automated, observed kiosk that you touch-screen your way through. There's no need for a testing appointment... it's not that long of a test. In fact, done this way, a person could take the test and submit the results with the application.
Finally, the interview. Just to verify the information and maybe do some spot-checks to make sure it is the correct person.
In all, the process from application to grant could take fewer than 3 weeks. It really isn't that much more complicated than the checks needed to get a drivers license.
With this process, first-come, first-served is not that hard to imagine.