+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
Seen12 said:
Conservatives running out of facts and relying on emotions to attract votes

True. But their filibustering appears to be being quite successful as a stalling-the-vote tactic. Harder must be asleep. Can anyone send him a double-double?
 
ChippyBoy said:
True. But their filibustering appears to be being quite successful as a stalling-the-vote tactic. Harder must be asleep.

They haven't delayed the Bill since the last time where they asked for 3 adjournments, the Bill is being debatted at every sitting
 
Redfield said:
They haven't delayed the Bill since the last time where they asked for 3 adjournments, the Bill is being debatted at every sitting

Incorrect. The Conservative caucus has been endeavouring to thwart this Bill every step of the way.
 
Yay they'll vote in 45 minutes and this stupid discussion will finally be over.
 
MarceauBletard said:
Yayyyyy :) ;D
What's next? Vote on the whole bill and back to HoC, eh?

Possibly. I would assume that right after the vote debate gets adjourned until tomorrow. And since nothing has been heard of another amendment in the pipeline, they might debate and vote on third reading tomorrow, actually. Fingers crossed.
 
Revoking a terrorist their citizenship and sending them back to their country is like giving them a second chance. If you really wonna be hard on terrorists. Then just let them rotten in jail!!
 
razerblade said:
always two cartoons who stand up and initiate a standing vote.

It's not that they don't trust the call. The conservatives simply want to have it in writing, name by name, that Senator such and such voted with no. That way they can use it later for their propaganda.
 
Not long and it'll be back in the HoC. Till then, these are the days of our lives.
 
Are they voting on the terrorism amendment now? Sorry I was in a meeting