+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
VS1987 said:
Hi Friends,

I have a question, if you can answer it.

My Open WP is expiring on Jan 23,2015. I applied for BOWP for myself and for my wife and approved today.
Now I want to know Do I need to informed CIC about this as they might not have copy of my BOWP in the file.
Do you guys think I need to send CIC a copy of BOWP once I receive hard copy?


Thanks in Advance

Hi VS1987,

They will come to know automatically as everything is tied to your UCI.

Regards,
Vishal
 
Hi friends... need your help on this.. received my gcms notes today morning..

Here are the details:
Assessment
Eligibility: In Progress
Criminality: In Progress
Security: Not Started
Medicals: Not Started

Updated Date : 2014/10/31
NOTES:
APPLICATION: E******** REGULATION: CEC-2013 I have analysed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and make the following recommendation. FOSS/GCMS check: - No adverse info. Principal applicant currently holds valid status in Canada.CIVIL STATUS:- PA never married- NO SPOUSE or common law declared - PA Copy of passport on File: Yes. WORK EXPERIENCE: CEC qualifying period is: from XXAPR2011 to XXAPR2014 Dates of authorized work experience within 'Qualifying Period'- in a skill level 0, A orB occupation: since XXOCT2012 Category of work permit: PGWP and LMO Post-secondary studies in Canada: College-Technical According to schedule 8: Work Experience 1: XXNOV2012 to LOCK_IN, NOC: 2242 selected, Full time XXX (Designation) with AAAAA(Company) Employment letter(s) dated XXMar2014 confirm date of employment, position title and a salary of $ZZk per year. LOE/Supporting Docs appear to match lead statement and a substantial number of the main duties under NOC code selected. A T4 from 2013 show(s) reported earnings of $XX k. A T4 from 2012 shows reported earnings of $M,Mk. A NOA from 2012 shows reported earnings of $BB,B k. Last pay-stubs from 2014 - on file LMO on file Web-based search conducted- online information verified - http://website Supporting docs appear sufficient to demonstrate required experience in this NOC code. ADDITIONAL NOTES: The T4 from 2013 shows total earnings of $XX k; however the reported earnings does not appear sufficient to confirm the salary of $ZZk per year indicated on the letter of employment and to match the wage of $ZZ /year indicated on the LMO - For officer Review IELTS submitted - Applicant meets benchmarks for work experience at this skill level: B. CRIMINALITY: - RCMP Screening: Fingerprints received.... No reportable trace. Medicals-Current medical status: Not started. RECOMMENDATION: REVIEW REQUIRED BY OFFICER

My details in chronological sequence:
Came to Canada: aug 2011
1 year study completed : aug 2012 with 4 months co-op
Job with AAAAA company started : nov 2012 - oct 2013 under PGWP
Nov 2013 - till date under LMO

Earnings:
T4 only for 2 months of 2012 : M.M k (less than 3k)
T4 for 2013 : XX k (between 20-25k)
T4 for 2014 : yet to recieve which will reflect $ZZ k
LMO needed and wage increased
NOA of 2013 : BB,B k ( which is 10k more than M.M k , due to co-op done for 4 months)
ZZk is current pay for 2014 after LMO.

As far as i believe the T4 from the co-op[not in possession] was not attached in the file which shows the difference in NOA and T4 from 2012. Another thing idk why they are matching my Total earnings of 2013($XX k) with total earnings of 2014($ZZ k which will be gained after one year in 2014) and i applied the file in April 2014.

Moreover the section has been updated since oct 31,2014.Is there anything else in notes to check?

Seniors please advice. Thanks alot
 
nobody have received medical this month very sad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(
 
VS1987 said:
Hi All,

I received my GCMS notes and I don't know why they put Eligibility as Review Required.

Application: Exxxxxx Regulation CEC-2013 I have analyzed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and make the following recommendation.
ACTION ITEMS: Policae Certificates for PA and Spouse Required.

Currently hold valid status in Canada.
CIVIL Status: PA Married

Additional Notes: PA and Spouce married in DEC2013. I note that PA lists he has been residing in Canada since SEP2010. Passport pages do not appear to indicate he has spent any extended period of time in India since residing in Canada.

Work Experience 1: CEC qualifying period is from xxAPR2011 to xxAPR2014 Dates of authorized work experience - within 'Qualifying Period in a skill level 0, A or B occupation:xxJAN2012 to LOCK IN NOC xxxx selected, Full time "Job Title" with "Company Name". Employment letter dated xxAPR2014 and xxAPR2014 confirm(s) date(s) of employments, position title and a salary of $xx.xxK per year. LOE/Supporting Docs appear to match lead statement and a substantial number of the mail duties under NOC code selected. A T4 from 2013 shows(s) reported earning of $xx.xxK. ADDITIONAL NOTES: PA's employment appears to be related to his previous studies in Canada. PA's salary appears to be in line with what is listed for NOC on jobbank website.
WORK EXPERIENCE 2: xxFEB2013 to xxAPR2013 NOC:xxxx selected, Full time "Job Title" with "Company Name". No letter of reference received. PA submitted other evidence. ADDITIONAL NOTES: PA submitted one ROE
WORK EXPERIENCE 3: xxMAY2012 to xxFEB2013, NOC:xxxx selected, Full time "Job Title" with "Company Name". Employment letter(s) dated xxFEB2013 confirm(s) date(s) of employment, position title and salary of $xx.xxK per year. LOE/Supporting Docs appear to match lead statement and a substantial number of the main duties under NOC code selected. ADDITIONAL NOTES: PA's employment appears to be related to his previous studies in Canada.

LANGUAGE IELTS submitted- Applicant meets benchmarks for work experience at this skill level: A.
CRIMINALITY: PA:-RCMP Screening :No reportable trace. Police Certificate India: Required.
"Same for the Spouse"

RECOMMENDATION: REVIEW REQUIRED BY OFFICER Additional notes: Officer may wish to review marriage between PA and
Spouse.



I don't understand what is the reason for Review Required Job or Marriage????

Any help from the members will be appreciated.

CEC_1304 said:
Above are 2 reason see above in blue
Good Luck


Hi CEC_1304,

So having a study field and same Job field is good thing or not?
Can you explaine why you said the first blue colored comment could be a reason?
 
Applied for my first GCMS notes today.
Will keep you guys posted on this. :)
 
VS1987 said:
Hi CEC_1304,

So having a study field and same Job field is good thing or not?
Can you explaine why you said the first blue colored comment could be a reason?
Hi
It was oversight by me. Sorry about that , I thought some thing else after reading VO additional comment
 
application received by cec on 22 april.....applied for gcms!!

And I am still waiting for either of them to show up :(
 
Hi folks!!!

Any ppr today??

Seems like cic is slow or may be it's happening like happened before in july 2014, when cic stopped sending ppr's and rprf's to applicants.then almost after 2 months in September. We suddenly saw shower of ppr's and rprf's.

Hoping to see ppr's and rprf's rain after 25th January.
Let's hope for best and pray to god.
Please comment..

Thanks
 
Hi Everyone,
Would the April Spreadsheet Moderators please update my line to reflect 'Medical results have been received' on January 2, 2015?
Keep warm!
8)

Njafter said:
'Medical results have been received'.
 
Done! Congrats!! :D

Looks like you passed the examination (as many people think that Medicals Received means in ECAS).
 
maxmoore said:
Done! Congrats!! :D

Looks like you passed the examination (as many people think that Medicals Received means in ECAS).

Can you also update the spreadsheet for my record to Nothing updated yet on ECAS as usual :D :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :D ;D ;D
 
jas-to-Canada,

I don't think you have anything to worry about, looks like a junior staff has done the preliminaries and now a senior person (CIC Officer needs to review). This is very common - remember they have been using casuals, including students to do the initial sorting of applications.
 
veeru5 said:
Can you also update the spreadsheet for my record to Nothing updated yet on ECAS as usual :D :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :D ;D ;D

Haha! You'll get good news soon :D