Question po pala. So if i will add my middle name, which part ko po ito ilalagay? and after ITA, is there any field where we need to provide complete name again? I mean, kung saan kailangan ko input ang middle name ko.
Well if you check my reply again, I did say "not worth to try IMO (in my opinion)" -- can't be any more obvious about that not being a "singular" info/fact, nor did I ignore the possibility of the entire reevaluation. Sorry for those not familiar with forum speak, although you can easily Google that.Yes, but to say it's "not worth to try" (in your previous reply) would be to ignore any possibility or chance that could help one's application. Let us avoid singularity and instead do further adequate and solid research prior to saying such bold statements because it might rub people off the wrong way.
Generally if a form does not have a separate middle name space/field, you can put it together with the first/given name. Key consideration is to be consistent with your passport.
It's really just the curriculum. Most reputable schools do actually take time to follow international standards at least. Also, remember that generally the PH educ system is somewhat a modified American system. Meanwhile, Canada has a British educ system, which makes it even more challenging to match for PH schools, unfortunately.
I also read from other posts that WES counts the number of total units and that the standing of the institution matters e.g. if the institution has been accredited by an external body like PAASCU -- although those are purely speculation only, as WES hasn't really disclosed how they assess credentials. Do you consider going for re-evaluation?
I never meant any harm in my post and you should know that it was not an attack against you. To set the record straight, I know what imo means as I oftentimes use it myself. I missed out reading on that word and I am sorry.Well if you check my reply again, I did say "not worth to try IMO (in my opinion)" -- can't be any more obvious about that not being a "singular" info/fact, nor did I ignore the possibility of the entire reevaluation. Sorry for those not familiar with forum speak, although you can easily Google that.
Oh don't get me wrong, I've done my own share of research. Can't say it's solid, but it's my best effort, enough to get me here in Canada. It's out of gratitude to the others that helped me here before that I'm still spending time going back here every now and then.
Anyway, general reminder to all is that any information provided here are opinions and interpretations out of best intention and interest, but should never be taken as sole facts. Always do your own cross-referencing with the IRCC website.
Yes, but I am still thinking about whom I'm going for, IQAS or ICES. Fees are most likely the same, however, as what I've heard IQAS assess credentials painstakingly. As for ICES, I haven't read much about their assessment from Philippines applicants. Care to share more?
By painstakingly do you mean that they have more stern and higher standards than WES or you simply mean the duration it takes for them to assess your credentials? What I would suggest you to do aside from the suggestion from Mr. Arthur, would be to ask around through Facebook. There are tons of Facebook groups you can join such as Pinoy to Canada and #PinoyCanada, and other non-Filipino groups such as Express Entry Law and Immigration to Canada. You can filter the posts there by using the search function. Should you not find the information you need, that will be the time you post an inquiry.Yes, but I am still thinking about whom I'm going for, IQAS or ICES. Fees are most likely the same, however, as what I've heard IQAS assess credentials painstakingly. As for ICES, I haven't read much about their assessment from Philippines applicants. Care to share more?
Nag agency o consultant ka ba?
It happened a long time ago when OINP-EE was first launched because of bugs in the system, so when the applicants submitted, they were duly rejected because they didn't have bachelor's degree equivalencies--OINP's stand was that it's still the applicant's responsibility to make sure that they meet the eligibility requirements, and they're not sure to be accepted just because they got a NOI. Until OINP lowers the eligibility criterium for education, don't count on it.
