A: 2 years of 5 years at any time point or
B: for very 2 years of 5 years of a PR card valid period?
Say, living for 1 year in Canada then left for 3 years, then living in Canada again for 1 year. A new card is issued after 3 months. At this point, if RO day calculation is under A, then PR cannot leave Canada for even ONE day until he continue living 9 months in Canada, because if he left for even one day, from the next day he will fail RO requirement, because form that day his living in Canada back to 5 years, he is only have one day to 2 years. However, if under B, he can leave Canada for up to another 3 years.
Which one is legally right?
B: for very 2 years of 5 years of a PR card valid period?
Say, living for 1 year in Canada then left for 3 years, then living in Canada again for 1 year. A new card is issued after 3 months. At this point, if RO day calculation is under A, then PR cannot leave Canada for even ONE day until he continue living 9 months in Canada, because if he left for even one day, from the next day he will fail RO requirement, because form that day his living in Canada back to 5 years, he is only have one day to 2 years. However, if under B, he can leave Canada for up to another 3 years.
Which one is legally right?