Rejected lets contected

[zulkfal]

I know how it feels, try to fax them explain the situation or order CAIPS for clarity.

 

[mandiebraxton]

typo?? in the letter he didn't even mentioned pharmacist! and kept saying 3131 is for dentist and i'm not a dentist!! hell yeah, i'm not a dentist cause i'm a pharmacist!! tried e-mail but no ans. now trying the FAX!! any suggestion from u?

This is rather unfortunate !

 

[Cappuccino]

NOC Code: 3131 - Pharmacist

[size=10pt][size=10pt]“[/size][/size]You have indicated that you have work experience in an occupation with the following NOC (National Occupational Classification) code: 3131 - DENTIST. Although this NOC code corresponds to the occupations specified in the Instructions identified by the Minister, you have not provided sufficient evidence that you performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of the occupation as set out in the occupational description of the NOC- 3131; DENTIST, including all of the essential duties.

After taking into consideration the work experience supporting documentation on file, I am not satisfied that you have performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of a DENTIST. As such, I am not satisfied that you are really a DENTIST - 3131.[size=10pt][size=10pt]”[/size][/size]


what a ........!!

Seems to me this is a really stupid mistake filling out the Schedule 3, since NOC 3131 is clearly not DENTIST. Did you complete these forms yourself or did you have a representative?

Wayne.

 

[pittabread]

Seems to me this is a really stupid mistake filling out the Schedule 3, since NOC 3131 is clearly not DENTIST. Did you complete these forms yourself or did you have a representative?

Wayne.

Wayne, You have misunderstood this. Its not his mistake but CIC officer. He filled the forms correctly and wrote the right NOC code for pharmacist. He is pharmacist and not dentist but CIC officer mistaken him for a dentist and rejected him. That CIC officer should be sacked immediately I suppose. I have advised him already what to do...check this

http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/applications-after-266-in-any-noc-connect-here-to-get-the-status-t49421.30615.html

Thanks

 

[pittabread]

typo?? in the letter he didn't even mentioned pharmacist! and kept saying 3131 is for dentist and i'm not a dentist!! hell yeah, i'm not a dentist cause i'm a pharmacist!! tried e-mail but no ans. now trying the FAX!! any suggestion from u?

Dear Muteman!

I agree with you its CIC officer's blunder. I think CIC have started employing incompetent people. Its not only you who is wrongly rejected but I saw another applicant viktoria from 26/6 thread. All the best to you and keep fighting your case.

Thanks

 

[mute_man]

Dear Muteman!

I agree with you its CIC officer's blunder. I think CIC have started employing incompetent people. Its not only you who is wrongly rejected but I saw another applicant viktoria from 26/6 thread. All the best to you and keep fighting your case.

Thanks

thanks, man.

 

[nargis]

VO please? Time varies wiht VO

Singapore vo

 

[Cappuccino]

Wayne, You have misunderstood this. Its not his mistake but CIC officer. He filled the forms correctly and wrote the right NOC code for pharmacist. He is pharmacist and not dentist but CIC officer mistaken him for a dentist and rejected him. That CIC officer should be sacked immediately I suppose. I have advised him already what to do...check this

http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/applications-after-266-in-any-noc-connect-here-to-get-the-status-t49421.30615.html

Thanks

OK yes this is clearly CIC's error, and CIO should be contacted immediately.

I already posted this on the post-June-26 thread, but here is a link to my blog where CanadaJimmy details how to use fax to appeal an unfair NER, and he got a positive result:
http://get2canada.wordpress.com/how-to-deal-with-unfair-ner/

Wayne.

 

[canadaforall]

OK yes this is clearly CIC's error, and CIO should be contacted immediately.

I already posted this on the post-June-26 thread, but here is a link to my blog where CanadaJimmy details how to use fax to appeal an unfair NER, and he got a positive result:
http://get2canada.wordpress.com/how-to-deal-with-unfair-ner/

Wayne.

Yes, sometimes they also make mistakes. So they should be able to correct it. They also made a mistake in my case. The visa officer ask me for a police certificate from Britain, when i have never been to Britain at all.

I took London Chambers of Commerce Examination and Royal Society of Arts Examination, while i was in my home country and he saw the certification and thought i studied in Britain. The center where i took the exams was clearly written in my application. These exams can be taken anywhere in the world, i am sure he has no clue about these examinations. Anyway i do not blame him or her, he is a French speaker and knows nothing about English Examinations.

I also attended an educational Conference in the USA for several days and he was asking for a police certificate also, i wrote already a letter explaining all to him. I still have copies of my visa for the USA , so i can always disprove him. They can not reject me for not providing police report for these countries. I have all the proves.

Just waiting to see what they will say.

 

[mute_man]

Dear Muteman!

I agree with you its CIC officer's blunder. I think CIC have started employing incompetent people. Its not only you who is wrongly rejected but I saw another applicant viktoria from 26/6 thread. All the best to you and keep fighting your case.

Thanks

don't know which one clicked, e-mail or FAX,, but it did!!!

i've got a reply!!

This refers to your recent correspondence received at our office requesting reconsideration . . . .

but i have to send the bank draft again as they've send it back already!!

thanks this forum to guide me through!!

i haven't got my application back yet,, if i get it back,, do i have to send it again?? or do they (CIO) has a copy?? anyone?


thank u, thank u, thank uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!

 

[mute_man]

OK yes this is clearly CIC's error, and CIO should be contacted immediately.

I already posted this on the post-June-26 thread, but here is a link to my blog where CanadaJimmy details how to use fax to appeal an unfair NER, and he got a positive result:
http://get2canada.wordpress.com/how-to-deal-with-unfair-ner/

Wayne.

don't know which one clicked, e-mail or FAX,, but it did!!!

i've got a reply!!

This refers to your recent correspondence received at our office requesting reconsideration . . . .

but i have to send the bank draft again as they've send it back already!!

thanks this forum to guide me through!!

i haven't got my application back yet,, if i get it back,, do i have to send it again?? or do they (CIO) has a copy?? anyone?


thank u, thank u, thank uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!

 

[Pippin]

don't know which one clicked, e-mail or FAX,, but it did!!!

i've got a reply!!

i haven't got my application back yet,, if i get it back,, do i have to send it again?? or do they (CIO) has a copy?? anyone?


thank u, thank u, thank uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!

Wonderful news that you got a response. Qorax usually says, SEND WHAT THEY ASK FOR, NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS. If they asked for a Draft, then I suspect they have NOT sent your application back (the only send back incomplete applications), so they must have yours on hand. If you question it at all, fax CIO back and ask directly. It may save you a lot of trouble rebuilding another application. All the VERY best!

 

[khalid h]

don't know which one clicked, e-mail or FAX,, but it did!!!

i've got a reply!!

This refers to your recent correspondence received at our office requesting reconsideration . . . .

but i have to send the bank draft again as they've send it back already!!

thanks this forum to guide me through!!

i haven't got my application back yet,, if i get it back,, do i have to send it again?? or do they (CIO) has a copy?? anyone?


thank u, thank u, thank uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!

Congratulations man, it shows us never to give up
Hope you will go thru all the process smoothly now onwards

 

[mute_man]

got PER yesterday!@!
thank u guyz for fighting with me.
8)

Dear Muteman!

I agree with you its CIC officer's blunder. I think CIC have started employing incompetent people. Its not only you who is wrongly rejected but I saw another applicant viktoria from 26/6 thread. All the best to you and keep fighting your case.

Thanks

 

[newlifeincanada]

got PER yesterday! @ !
thank u guyz for fighting with me.
8)

congrates man, I am happy for you...