Parents Visitor Visa

[aBc_1990]

Hi Everyone,

My parents were in Canada for 2 years on visit and their TRV expired, they had valid visitor records. They left for the UK and I applied for their TRV, they are in UK for visit and they have valid visitor visa, they been to UK 4 time on Visit and they also have valid US visit visa.

They left Canada on 3rd October and on 4th October I updated the IRCC that they left Canada, I applied for their TRV on 5th October and on 9October I received update on their in-process visitor record that its refused because they left the country and officer notes also states that their visitor record request was until 30 October 2026 they left on 3rd October so they do not qualify for visitor record.

I am not now which visa office is looking for my parents visitor visa? Because as per processing time London visa office processing time is 24 days and their application is in process from more than 24 days, or its Abu Dhabi visa office because they are Pakistani national? and should I raise a web-form?

Regarding their visitor record I shared all the medical record and I did share the medical record this time too and explained why we need TRV.

Regards

 

[CanGoldDigger]

Most likely Abu Dhabi, you can check that by calling or requesting an ATIP.

-- Regarding their visitor record I shared all the medical record and I did share the medical record this time too and explained why we need TRV.

Not sure what is it you ask about.

 

[canuck78]

Hi Everyone,

My parents were in Canada for 2 years on visit and their TRV expired, they had valid visitor records. They left for the UK and I applied for their TRV, they are in UK for visit and they have valid visitor visa, they been to UK 4 time on Visit and they also have valid US visit visa.

They left Canada on 3rd October and on 4th October I updated the IRCC that they left Canada, I applied for their TRV on 5th October and on 9October I received update on their in-process visitor record that its refused because they left the country and officer notes also states that their visitor record request was until 30 October 2026 they left on 3rd October so they do not qualify for visitor record.

I am not now which visa office is looking for my parents visitor visa? Because as per processing time London visa office processing time is 24 days and their application is in process from more than 24 days, or its Abu Dhabi visa office because they are Pakistani national? and should I raise a web-form?

Regarding their visitor record I shared all the medical record and I did share the medical record this time too and explained why we need TRV.

Regards

Processing times re not guaranteed. If they want a better chance of getting a TRV they should be returning home and getting reestablished before trying to visit Canada again. After a 2 year visit it will appear as they are trying to live in Canada if they applied for a new TRV from a 3ed country right after leaving Canada. Even with a valid TRV they could run into issues trying to enter Canada for another visit if they have recently left Canada after a 2 year visit. In general they need to be planning for longterm life in Pakistan because they won’t be able to visit indefinitely and chances of sponsorship are relatively low these days.

 

[aBc_1990]

Processing times re not guaranteed. If they want a better chance of getting a TRV they should be returning home and getting reestablished before trying to visit Canada again. After a 2 year visit it will appear as they are trying to live in Canada if they applied for a new TRV from a 3ed country right after leaving Canada. Even with a valid TRV they could run into issues trying to enter Canada for another visit if they have recently left Canada after a 2 year visit. In general they need to be planning for longterm life in Pakistan because they won’t be able to visit indefinitely and chances of sponsorship are relatively low these days.

So It mean its in London visa office and taking time?

I can understand but their previous extension and this TRV both are on medical grounds and support.

 

[canuck78]

So It mean its in London visa office and taking time?

I can understand but their previous extension and this TRV both are on medical grounds and support.

Medical grounds? They are applying to visit Canada. If they have longterm medical and support needs that would not be grounds to get approved for visitor visa/supervisa. They are still expected to be setting up a system that will support them in their home country or another country other than Canada for the future. The fact that they only recently left Canada and did not return to their home country may raise concerns that they don’t have a home in their home country to return to. A supervisa isn’t a permanent move, it only requires proof of annual emergency medical support with a provision for repatriation once stable enough, as a parent or grandparent accumulates more preexisting conditions they will have even less coverage for emergencies they may experience when it Canada so they put themselves and their families at even more financial risk. The 100k coverage is already too low and families are shocked when many hospitals are now being asked to drain their savings and take out a loan if they don’t the savings available. They may not be able to secure supervisa insurance next year and that would be another reason they would need to return home. Sadly I think that you are not the only one who thinks they will be able to keep extending or renewing their parent’s supervisa and that their parents will be able to visit Canada until they pass away. The Canadian government has done a very poor job explaining that Canada expects that most parents/grandparents will have to return home. Many are shocked when their extensions are being denied, when their H&C applications are refused or that they parents could be removed while waiting for the result of the H&C application, when parents attempting to remain in Canada often have their stays dismissed and are removed from Canada. The feasibility of PGP and the supervisa in their current state has somehow gone under the radar but this year the general population has suddenly become aware of these programs. If parents want the best chance to be able to keep visiting Canada for long periods of time they should be returning to their home country for long periods of time to reestablish their lives in their home country and then reapply for another supervisa. If they still have valid supervisa but have spent a few years visiting Canada they should also return to their home country reestablish their life there before attempting to return for another longer visit. A genuine visitor would not leave Canada and try to return for another visit soon after leaving. That would he visiting their home country not Canada.

 

[aBc_1990]

Medical grounds? They are applying to visit Canada. If they have longterm medical and support needs that would not be grounds to get approved for visitor visa/supervisa. They are still expected to be setting up a system that will support them in their home country or another country other than Canada for the future. The fact that they only recently left Canada and did not return to their home country may raise concerns that they don’t have a home in their home country to return to. A supervisa isn’t a permanent move, it only requires proof of annual emergency medical support with a provision for repatriation once stable enough, as a parent or grandparent accumulates more preexisting conditions they will have even less coverage for emergencies they may experience when it Canada so they put themselves and their families at even more financial risk. The 100k coverage is already too low and families are shocked when many hospitals are now being asked to drain their savings and take out a loan if they don’t the savings available. They may not be able to secure supervisa insurance next year and that would be another reason they would need to return home. Sadly I think that you are not the only one who thinks they will be able to keep extending or renewing their parent’s supervisa and that their parents will be able to visit Canada until they pass away. The Canadian government has done a very poor job explaining that Canada expects that most parents/grandparents will have to return home. Many are shocked when their extensions are being denied, when their H&C applications are refused or that they parents could be removed while waiting for the result of the H&C application, when parents attempting to remain in Canada often have their stays dismissed and are removed from Canada. The feasibility of PGP and the supervisa in their current state has somehow gone under the radar but this year the general population has suddenly become aware of these programs. If parents want the best chance to be able to keep visiting Canada for long periods of time they should be returning to their home country for long periods of time to reestablish their lives in their home country and then reapply for another supervisa. If they still have valid supervisa but have spent a few years visiting Canada they should also return to their home country reestablish their life there before attempting to return for another longer visit. A genuine visitor would not leave Canada and try to return for another visit soon after leaving. That would he visiting their home country not Canada.

By medical grounds mean we need them because we need their support here during our medical procedures which are delaying from 2022 and we now finally got dates.