Here
A39-41 refers to IRPA regulations
According to
Section 39 or the IRPA, a foreign national is inadmissible for financial reasons if they are or will be unable or unwilling to support themself or any other person who is dependent on them, and have not satisfied an officer that adequate arrangements for care and support, other than those that involve social assistance, have been made.
According to
Subsection 40(1) of the IRPA, a permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible for misrepresentation:
- For directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding material facts relating to a relevant matter that induces or could induce an error in the administration of the IRPA [according to the Immigration Manual, admissibility for misrepresentation occurs only if it is material; the misrepresentation must affect the process undertaken by or the final decision of the immigration officer];
According to
Section 41 of the IRPA, a person is inadmissible for failing to comply with the IRPA:
- In the case of a foreign national, through an act or omission which contravenes, directly or indirectly, a provision of the IRPA; and
- In the case of a permanent resident, through failing to comply with Subsection 27(2) [which states that a permanent resident must comply with any conditions imposed under the IRPR] or Section 28 of the IRPA.
Part 1, Division 4 of the Act makes distinctions based on categories of inadmissibility related to:
- criminality;
- organized criminality;
- security;
- human or international rights violations;
- health;
- financial reasons;
- misrepresentation;
- non-compliance;
- inadmissible family members.
In your case the relevant part that IRCC was checking was for non-compliance, which was cancelled, most likely sine there were no concerns for it.
