+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

mistake, should I of included job in application I didn't attend but got paid?

Aussieaussie!

Full Member
Mar 12, 2013
25
0
I had a job offer from a company but didn't end up joining them in the end and only got paid for a two hour long seminar which I got paid around $30 for. I only have one job and there is a $30 difference between by NOA and T4 for my current job.

Lawyer said I didn't have to include it as I never did the job in the end. It was a skilled job HOWEVER I only attended the intro seminar (got no tour, training etc.. didnt even work on site).
 

seton

Hero Member
Jun 6, 2012
513
61
Category........
Visa Office......
Ottawa
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
04-06-2012
AOR Received.
05-11-2012
Med's Request
15-02-2013
Med's Done....
21-02-2013
Passport Req..
04-04-2013
VISA ISSUED...
22-04-2013
LANDED..........
03-05-2013
My personal opinion here would be inline with what your lawyer said - I don't really think it counts as employment for CIC purposes, and I don't think it'll raise any flags on their end.
 

ujbaby

Champion Member
May 21, 2011
1,366
13
toronto,on
Category........
Visa Office......
CPP-O
NOC Code......
3233
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14/08/2012. Sydney received on 17/08/12
AOR Received.
september 8th 2012
IELTS Request
sent with application
Med's Request
Aug-07-2013
Med's Done....
Aug-22-2013, dependents 28-08-13
Interview........
waived
Passport Req..
september 6th 2013, cic received on sept 10th, 2013
VISA ISSUED...
05/09/2013
LANDED..........
November 2nd, 2013
Aussieaussie! said:
I had a job offer from a company but didn't end up joining them in the end and only got paid for a two hour long seminar which I got paid around $30 for. I only have one job and there is a $30 difference between by NOA and T4 for my current job.

Lawyer said I didn't have to include it as I never did the job in the end. It was a skilled job HOWEVER I only attended the intro seminar (got no tour, training etc.. didnt even work on site).
u better include a written explanation to cic. Any difference in NOA, job letter and T4 will raise a red flag. Try as much as u could to avoid any form of confusion,
 

seton

Hero Member
Jun 6, 2012
513
61
Category........
Visa Office......
Ottawa
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
04-06-2012
AOR Received.
05-11-2012
Med's Request
15-02-2013
Med's Done....
21-02-2013
Passport Req..
04-04-2013
VISA ISSUED...
22-04-2013
LANDED..........
03-05-2013
ujbaby said:
Any difference in NOA, job letter and T4 will raise a red flag.
I highly doubt this statement as it would be pretty rare for your NOA to exactly match the combination of your job letter and T4s, due not only to timing, but other things that can be included in your income on your tax return. The NOA is used to substantiate your other documents, but differences are going to occur and rationally, this would not be a "red flag" unless your prior year NOA + current pay stubs ends up being substantially less than what your job letter states.

<-- Accountant
 

jsm0085

Champion Member
Feb 26, 2012
2,665
293
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
Everything - everything should be included in your background dec. if you received a payment have it as training as xxx for xxx from xxx to xxx.

Omitting something is far worse than including something that happened. Include it and you will have no problems.
 

ujbaby

Champion Member
May 21, 2011
1,366
13
toronto,on
Category........
Visa Office......
CPP-O
NOC Code......
3233
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14/08/2012. Sydney received on 17/08/12
AOR Received.
september 8th 2012
IELTS Request
sent with application
Med's Request
Aug-07-2013
Med's Done....
Aug-22-2013, dependents 28-08-13
Interview........
waived
Passport Req..
september 6th 2013, cic received on sept 10th, 2013
VISA ISSUED...
05/09/2013
LANDED..........
November 2nd, 2013
jsm0085 said:
Everything - everything should be included in your background dec. if you received a payment have it as training as xxx for xxx from xxx to xxx.

Omitting something is far worse than including something that happened. Include it and you will have no problems.
agree ++, @ OP, don't say that u were not told ::) ::)