Iamrobot85 said:
Sorry, I was not aware that knowing a few people working within a profession made you qualify to remark on how easy or hard that job is, and to know what it is that the people working within these professions deserve to make.
In that case, having known a few surgeons, lawyers, and CEOs, I must say they are terribly overpaid.
That's not a serious argument, Iamrobot. If your logic were sound, no one could reach any legitimate conclusion about another's profession/job without quitting one's day job and studying the other's job for months, even years.
The simpler the job, the easier it is to judge it. Conversely, the more complex the job, the harder it is to understand it and judge its value to society.
Knowing the complex educational requirements of surgeons, I assume they earn their incomes; I would need to study many, many surgeons before I dared to conclude that they were worth less than they currently make.
But postal workers are not surgeons. They don't handle lives; they handle mail. They are essentially unskilled labour, and you don't need to know many posties to reach a reasonable consclusion about their value to society.
A first-year engineer -- after 4-6 years of rigorous university, which the postie doesn't have -- assists in designing a bridge over which we will drive with our kids in the car. If he is worth $55,000 a year, how can senior postal workers be equal in value?
Some might say that the postie only attains $55,000 with experience, but with experience comes age, and an older postie doesn't become a better letter deliverer; instead he slows down, becomes a worse letter deliverer, and yet the union demands he get paid more.
In contrast, with experience the engineer may gain enough experience to lead the project to build the next bridge, and with that he assumes the responsibility, the heavy burden of making sure the bridge does not collapse under the car carrying our kids. He is worth more with experience; the postie is not.
So, let's not try to dismiss someone's opinions about posties merely because he doesn't know gazillions. If you think his views wrong, show us why.