Everyone speculates on this forum, no matter how "knowledgeable" they may sound. They may be right than another but I only believe what I see written and when it happens.
Bill C-6: Senate stage
- Thread starter marcher
- Start date
With all due respect, I am not speculating. I directly quoted the Leader of the Government in the House who was asked what will be the business of the week after the break and said this:
"When we come back, we will proceed with Bill C-6 on citizenship.
On Tuesday and Wednesday, we will continue with second reading debate of Bill C-46.
Thursday, June 1, will be an allotted day."
(you can find this in the Hansard of Thursday, May 18)
Speculating would be if I simply made up stuff from my own "feelings". I was directly referring to the statement above.
Now it seems that today, Monday, they are doing C-46 which they were originally planning to do on Tuesday. So it might very well be that they mixed up the week a bit.
But again, I am NOT speculating but basing my assessments on important sources. The Leader of the Government in the House is the one who controls the Government Orders and what is being discussed in the House. So if anything, the Leader of the Governmetn in the House is the best source that is available to us.
I also find it a bit offensive that you put "knowledgeable" in quotes as if I'm just pretentious and don't actually provide help. Nobody needs to call me knowledgeable (without the quotes), but I'm not wasting hours on this forum to be called "knowledgeable" (with quotes).
sbag_in
Hero Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 37
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- NEW DELHI
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 31-MARCH, 2014
- Doc's Request.
- NONE
- AOR Received.
- 14-MAY(aor1) / 31-JUL(aor2)
- File Transfer...
- 15-JULY, 2014, IP- OCT-30
- Med's Request
- UPFRONT
- Med's Done....
- 29-JAN, 2014
- Interview........
- NONE
- Passport Req..
- and D.M. on NOV-3, 2014
- VISA ISSUED...
- received on : 10TH NOV, 2014
- LANDED..........
- Jan -18, 2015
agreed.. you do hellava job my friend.. you do all the leg work for lazy bums like me... know this.. it is "much appreciated".. trust me.. look at the number of likes you have. keep up the good work... and thanks again...
spyfy thanks for everything u do to this forum
sivabalan
Star Member
- Jan 25, 2014
- 13
- Category........
- FSW
- Visa Office......
- Buffalo, NY
- NOC Code......
- 0231
- App. Filed.......
- 01-08-2010
- Passport Req..
- 01-08-2013
- VISA ISSUED...
- 01-09-2013
- LANDED..........
- 20-09-2013
Someone was talking about what I reported regarding a statement from B. Chagger. Then you quoted that very post and said "Everyone speculates on this forum, no matter how "knowledgeable" they may sound." I don't know how that cannot be taken as referring to me personally.
Yes, this forum is full of speculations, but you said "EVERYONE speculates". That's wrong because I don't. The reference to B. Chagger was a quote from her as a government representative. That's not speculation. That's what I was trying to say earlier.
If you did not intend to refer to me specifically, I'm of course happy to hear that.
If it's gonna go back to senate, I don't think it'll be law by end of June.
let's just have more patience then
C-6 is supposed to be back to the Senate in any way! It has to be stamped there prior to becoming a low.
https://twitter.com/SenJaffer/status/869066709629517827
He said "Thank you very much for your kind words. #C6 not law yet. Still hard work to do #senCa"
What kind of patience? after exceeding one and half year? waiting more than that is insane
This is not correct. If the HoC accepted all amendments as proposed by the Senate, the bill would go directly to the Governor General for Royal Assent.
Obviously, by now it is clear that the HoC will not simply accept all amendments, so this case is not relevant.
Just wanted to point out that it's not correct that "C-6 is supposed to be back to the Senate in any way".
I did send an e-mail. Honestly, everybody should do the same. It is time for public pressure