Bill C-6: Senate stage

[tyl92]

if this bill is so flawed , why don't they just throw it in the trash .
Today it is language and age , at committee they settled that question , the proportion of people where language skills have not been assessed during the pr process , is very LOW .. the people concerned to this are the one sponsored by family members ..Tomorrow , it will be something else .
They talked about it ever since first reading , WHY all THOSE amendments were not presented at committee stage .. They make me sick.
If someone thinks , that all this was not made on purpose , then i don't know what to say .

 

[Varangian]

NOW by Sen. Griffin, Diane

Thank you! Hope they proceed with voting soon.

 

[razerblade]

Thank you! Hope they proceed with voting soon.

She just proposed an amendment on language requirement, and not read for a 3rd time.

Senators are debating now.

 

[AliChraim]

Is the Bill on tomorrow's Agenda as well?

 

[screech339]

Someone should remind cons and all senators that the man who done terrorist attack on a mosque in Quebec city

He is born in Quebec, must be stripped his citizenship

Unless he has French citizenship, they cannot strip him of citizenship. Thus if convicted of terrorism, he will still have his citizenship.

 

[hangincanada]

Is the Bill on tomorrow's Agenda as well?

it will be show up on everyday's agenda until it is finalized.

 

[Redfield]

She wants to deny women citizenship because they are typically the ones who are at risk to not learn english or french as a way to incentivize them to learn the language, it doesn't make sense, she's just injustly making it impossible for them to become Canadian thus leaving them at the mercy of their family that actually has citizenship

 

[hangincanada]

if this bill is so flawed , why don't they just throw it in the trash .
Today it is language and age , at committee they settled that question , the proportion of people where language skills have not been assessed during the pr process , is very LOW .. the people concerned to this are the one sponsored by family members ..Tomorrow , it will be something else .
They talked about it ever since first reading , WHY all THOSE amendments were not presented at committee stage .. They make me sick.
If someone thinks , that all this was not made on purpose , then i don't know what to say .

I agree. not very backed up in many aspects.

 

[tyl92]

No datas , no numbers ... and still manage to have time to laugh.

 

[proudian]

https://twitter.com/msuhailwaterloo/status/849707880165126145

Someone asked if this could delay the bill and answer was yes by senator Jaffer

 

[Varangian]

https://twitter.com/msuhailwaterloo/status/849707880165126145

Someone asked if this could delay the bill and answer was yes by senator Jaffer

Thank you! But that's obvious! They will delay the bill. The right question would be for how long.

 

[captain74]

Thank you! But that's obvious! They will delay the bill. The right question would be for how long.

As long as it takes for the Liberals to realize that no debate ever just ends by itself! Someone needs to stand up and move the senate to adopt the bill - that is what forces a vote!

 

[hangincanada]

it has been SIX sittings in the third reading, all about amendments and haven't debated on the bill itself yet.
Guess how many more sittings would be in the third reading. Disappointing!

 

[lilen]

six sittings till now and cons just realise that they need a new amendment, i think they were sleeping in the committee meetings, something funny is happening,

 

[Varangian]

As long as it takes for the Liberals to realize that no debate ever just ends by itself! Someone needs to stand up and move the senate to adopt the bill - that is what forces a vote!

100% agree! The thing is that there is nobody to stand up and push it hard enough.