Background Checks -EXPLAINED >>>

[cowboy31]

dear sir qorax

thank you so much i got it now

 

[mehulca]

Dear Qorax,

Today, I received my CAIPS report in which there is nothing except 10 points for my age. One line written in caipts read as "PAPER FILE SENT TO MPR - FILE BF'D TO FRR ON 21-01-2011" What does this mean? Is this my BF'D? If yes, then its already passed. No other BF'D mentioned in caips report. How can I know when my case will be looked into by the VO?

Waiting for your reply sir.

 

[qorax]

Waiting for your reply sir.

Ur file is yet in PA [hibernating] - not out for further processing.
U could expect to hear something in a month or 2 however, since u have completed the 24 months mandatory wait.

 

[MBKP]

Dear Qorax! ... It has been more than 4 months now that i have done my Medicals and theres no update since then. Medicals status is also NOT updated on E-CAS yet.

Since you suggested in my previous query that i should write an email to CHC London in case PPR-1 doesnt arrive after 4 months, Could you please tell me the email address on which to Send an Enquiry & if you help me with the body of email that i am supposed to send them.

Thanks for always being there

 

[docpak]

Dear Qorax! ... It has been more than 4 months now that i have done my Medicals and theres no update since then. Medicals status is also NOT updated on E-CAS yet.

Since you suggested in my previous query that i should write an email to CHC London in case PPR-1 doesnt arrive after 4 months, Could you please tell me the email address on which to Send an Enquiry & if you help me with the body of email that i am supposed to send them.

Thanks for always being there

best of luck MBPK i can understand ur worry and irritation.......its 4th month started with my medical too.....may everything go smooth...ammin
bestof luck

 

[MBKP]

best of luck MBPK i can understand ur worry and irritation.......its 4th month started with my medical too.....may everything go smooth...ammin
bestof luck

hahha.. dude .. mine E-cas is not even updated with Medical Results man.. dats why i think .. i should give em a buzzz....

 

[mehulca]

Ur file is yet in PA [hibernating] - not out for further processing.
U could expect to hear something in a month or 2 however, since u have completed the 24 months mandatory wait.

Thanks for the reply. I am a bit worried as no future date is mentioned in my CAIPS. BTW I have not yet completed 24 months from document submission. I am nearing 18 months.

In my CAIPS, it is written that standard MI-1 reply sent in response to CSQ, which means that they are not looking at our files while replying to CSQ.

Do you believe pre-juners will be processed in 2012 by CHC-ND?

 

[(INDIAN)]

Thanks for the reply. I am a bit worried as no future date is mentioned in my CAIPS. BTW I have not yet completed 24 months from document submission. I am nearing 18 months.

In my CAIPS, it is written that standard MI-1 reply sent in response to CSQ, which means that they are not looking at our files while replying to CSQ.

Do you believe pre-juners will be processed in 2012 by CHC-ND?

[size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt][size=10pt]
TODAY I RECEIVED CALL FROM FRIEND
Delhi chc start working on prejunes

ONE OF my friend recived medical
other has line added that case is reviewed
one jan 2010and other feb 2010 case .NOC 4131AND 1111.
INDIAN[/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]

 

[WMK]

Dear Qorax

I have done medicals on 9th January, 2012. I received my CAIPS yesterday.
PSDEC is 1
SELDEC is 4
SEC/CRIM is 1
BDEC.

NO APPARENT CRIMINALITY CONCERNS. NO APPARENT CONCERNS. RIH: PLS FOSS AND PHEP

RIH: FOR MEDS PLS. NOT FOSS AND PHEP !

Please help me understand what it means?

Regards

 

[Sharp2000]

Hi qorax

here i am posting my own case regarding marriage. I am one of the applicants of pre june 2010. My Case is In Process since Feb 2011 in CHC NDVO. My initial applicatin date is Jan 2010. Before I applied to Canadian PR I had applied for Residence and Work permit of one of the European countries and got residence visa in Jan 2011. After getting this Visa I came to Europe in March 2011. Sinnce then I have been living in Europe legally. Feeling lonely in Europe, I managed to get one marriage certificate being married with my girl friend from my country. I applied her as dependent. she got visa in August 2011 and landed in Europe in October 2011. We are here in Europe together as husband and wife in same address.

Now the problem is that I have not yet informed CHC ND concerning the change in marrital status. but I have only informed CHC ND that I have moved to ........country in Europe and no more in my office from where i had submitted my work experince latter. My fear for not informing CHC ND about my marrital status is the possibility of further delay in processing my application and possible varification of my marriage document by VO. Please seniors help me solve this problem .....I will be very glad for your valuable suggesstions ...

 

[thereds]

Standard Documentation Checks:
Our background check is done at the CHC stage. It commences the moment our file gets the 1st BFD by the VO. An indicator of which is the e-CAS that shows "In Progress". All docs been checked & our NOC being tallied against the MI, if the VO finds our case 'eligible' for Canadian PR, the file becomes 'Accepted'; and then it goes for standard background checks, viz. Exp, Quals, Adaptability, Qualitative Considerations etc.

I have a question about this particular point that I've highlighted in bold.

I was under the impression that the CIO who gives the case a PER has already determined that the case meets the NOC applicability against the MI. Is the VO going to check it again or is the VO going to do the background check on the documents provided, which in my opinion are two completely different things?

If the VO is going to review the NOC applicability against the MI, then I suppose even if the CIO has given the file a PER, the VO could reject the case. Is my understanding right?

 

[dubaiite]

I have a question about this particular point that I've highlighted in bold.

I was under the impression that the CIO who gives the case a PER has already determined that the case meets the NOC applicability against the MI. Is the VO going to check it again or is the VO going to do the background check on the documents provided, which in my opinion are two completely different things?

If the VO is going to review the NOC applicability against the MI, then I suppose even if the CIO has given the file a PER, the VO could reject the case. Is my understanding right?

YES true....

 

[thereds]

YES true....

What's true? My understanding?

 

[qorax]

Hi qorax

here i am posting my own case regarding marriage. I am one of the applicants of pre june 2010. My Case is In Process since Feb 2011 in CHC NDVO. My initial applicatin date is Jan 2010. Before I applied to Canadian PR I had applied for Residence and Work permit of one of the European countries and got residence visa in Jan 2011. After getting this Visa I came to Europe in March 2011. Sinnce then I have been living in Europe legally. Feeling lonely in Europe, I managed to get one marriage certificate being married with my girl friend from my country. I applied her as dependent. she got visa in August 2011 and landed in Europe in October 2011. We are here in Europe together as husband and wife in same address.

Now the problem is that I have not yet informed CHC ND concerning the change in marrital status. but I have only informed CHC ND that I have moved to ........country in Europe and no more in my office from where i had submitted my work experince latter. My fear for not informing CHC ND about my marrital status is the possibility of further delay in processing my application and possible varification of my marriage document by VO. Please seniors help me solve this problem .....I will be very glad for your valuable suggesstions ...

U'd have to info ur IO abt this someday [b4 meds] - else, u'd never be able to bring ur spouse to Canada. So, do it NOW.

 

[qorax]

I have a question about this particular point that I've highlighted in bold.

I was under the impression that the CIO who gives the case a PER has already determined that the case meets the NOC applicability against the MI. Is the VO going to check it again or is the VO going to do the background check on the documents provided, which in my opinion are two completely different things?

If the VO is going to review the NOC applicability against the MI, then I suppose even if the CIO has given the file a PER, the VO could reject the case. Is my understanding right?

We have touched this many times over.

CIO performs only a cursory check [note: Not Scrutiny]. They check ur apps for correct filing [under an NOC of the 29] and whether the apps r filled correctly with the basic supporting docs [as per the checklist]. That's it, b4 sending a PER [provisional acceptance].

It's the VO who [re]assesses ur file, does deep scrutiny [note: Scrutiny, not Check] to opine/perceive if u r Fit for further processing. At this stage they may 'reject' ur case too [happened with quite a few].

Qorax