Peachnibbler said:
Yes if u ll go on full hearing then MC will diffinatly come to see ur lawyer in ur lawyers office for proofs before 10 days or 1 week .But it doesnt depand of MC when he/she ll will see ur case n get upset or not. but yeah it wil b in ur favour if MC wil not get upset . Then might b MC will less argu in the court ..i realy good hope tht u must have strong proofs n ur wife get prep.nomaan78 said:
U r right about child gango girl. Child is a enough avidence to prove of genuineness.. but i tell u a hearing decision tht i ve read in appeal case at the link ...gango girl said:
Unbelievable ...that a judge said so.... shocked to read this... can u pls provide link to that appeal..Hina 123 said:U r right about child gango girl. Child is a enough avidence to prove of genuineness.. but i tell u a hearing decision tht i ve read in appeal case at the link ...
Judge gave decision in the end of hearing tht appeal is rejected due to some reason n judge had also mentioned tht child is not a genuiness to prove relation.sponsor had kid with his wife. i was shocked when i read this .whatelse more they need for prove . I guess the case was early year of 2000 . But the judge said in the end and he rejected... u can search on "appeal cases of canada spouse" . So make ur file strong n have patience . U ll get soon .
I ve mentioned on my previous post . Go on google n write " appeals of spouse immigration in canada " i was seaching on google tht i found cases decision . It was year wise cases... u can search.. when we were seaching lawyer for apeal .then some of lawyer said have child then case wil be strong n some of lawyer said child would be good option but not guarantee to win ur case .so we went for tht lawyer.no one lawyer would give u 100% garantee to win case ... but now a days appeals r gping to win they r just killing with time thts it.Vijender_Rana said:
Yes absolutely right mikeymyke .. thts y i ve mentioned on my previous post tht ur file should be strong enough .plz do whateveru can do best for strong ur file. Lawyer help it but ourself must need to make strong. Like proofs r qality wise good rather than quantity wise... i had thousand s pages n logs etc etc but i'd chose only qaulity waise proofs among all.but cutshort dont get upset just be patient .. :-*mikeymyke said:
i agree with most of what you wrote but not the last part. I think maybe you are talking about people in their 60s or something marrying 20 year olds...lol (although even that is possible). Canadians have high life expectancy. I doubt very much that somebody who feels their life is getting short will be looking to get married with somebody out of this country lol. Most likely people who are older are well established and have too much to loose to do that. In addition people with life experience are less likely to just settle for anybody. They have had a family and still most likely have and know there is more to a relationship than just getting married. For most women relationship means more work..both physical and mental. I am sure that there are cases such that you are talking about but they are far and in between. In a modern western society women are usually pretty fit, take good care of themselves and look relatively young and are often comfortable financially and have a good idea what they like or dont like about people . they are not eager to just find somebody the same way younger girls are who are waiting to get married and start a family. There are plenty of young people who get taken in by scammers both inland and outland.mikeymyke said:I agree that it doesnt matter age or culture difference, as long as the marriage is genuine, the sponsored spouse should be allowed into the country. However, the problem is that VOs cannot read your minds and cannot make a true determination if your marriage is genuine or not, so they have to rely on "red flags" like age, cultural difference, etc. There's really no choice other than to do that, besides letting every spouse into Canada regardless of background. So because of this, it's our job as the sponsors to ensure that the PR application is solid, with lots of evidence.
Age differences in countries like USA, Australia, obviously this is not an issue, but in other countries, its viewed as a red flag (even though Canadian culture is full of couples like this), because in THOSE countries, age difference are unusual. CIC has to judge relationships based on the applicant's country, not whether it's similar to Canadian culture. They might think that a person who grew up in a country where age differences are unusual, he/she will grow up with those kind of views into adulthood, and for him/her to marry a Canadian with a large age difference, then that means for that person to break his own cultural norms, he/she must have an ulterior motive for the marriage. I've noticed that in many cases in which an age difference is present, 9 times out of 10, its usually the younger spouse that's the one being sponsored. Usually the younger, non-Canadian spouse has a greater incentive to enter Canada, and can more easily manipulate an older Canadian spouse, than could a younger Canadian spouse, because an older Canadian spouse feels his/her life is shortening and wants to quickly find a life partner, , at least that's what I think CIC feels . I don't know
Well, just look at most of the age difference cases here and on Canlii.org. 9 times out of 10, the younger spouse is the one being sponsored when there is a significant age difference. A much older Canadian spouse who marries abroad, is very likely not to marry someone his own age, rather someone much younger, because in Canada, he does not want to marry an old woman, but he knows he cannot get a younger woman either due to his age. But a younger woman abroad who desires to come live abroad, will take up that opportunity.soblue3 said:
