My issue is that it is WORK EXPERIENCE that is being measured. So the actual hours worked should be considered. For argument sake, if two people work 2000 hours, one over a 12 month period and the other in 7 months out of 12, how is their actual EXPERIENCE any different?
An example to consider: a person works 4 to 6 months, 12 hours daily with no days off (yes, this is a common cruise ship contract). That person would work between 1440-2160 hours in that contract, excluding any overtime. Compare that to the "minimum" 30 hour full time week and the work hours would be between 480-720 hours in that same 4-6 month period.
Has anyone been given credit for their actual hours of work experience?
Thank you jes-ON for your information. There is still the issue that crew would have to work almost three times as many hours as a 30 hr week person to get credit for one 12 month year (and it would take more than 12 months as they often have breaks of several months between contracts). There is a clear discrepancy here.
In the case of a fly in/ fly out position working 14 days on and 14 off, they would technically get credit for only 6 months work per year even though they worked 168 hours in 4 weeks compared to the minimum 120 hrs/4 wks.