+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

mcgyver

Hero Member
Apr 13, 2009
685
88
Category........
Visa Office......
Singapore
NOC Code......
2174
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
5-05-2014
Nomination.....
11-06-2014
AOR Received.
11-08-2014
File Transfer...
23-06-2014
Med's Request
16-04-2015
Med's Done....
29-04-2015
Interview........
Waived
Passport Req..
29-06-2015 Decision Made: 30-06-2015 PP Submitted...: 1-07-2015
VISA ISSUED...
10-07-2015 PP Returned....: 11-08-2015
LANDED..........
01-10-2015
Hello Everyone,

Since I am a new immigrant, I can recall from my fresh experience that an applicant for permanent residency is required to submit ORIGINAL IELTS results that are no older than 2 years whereas an applicant for citizenship has the flexibility of submitting a mere photocopy (not even original) of IELTS results obtained a long time ago (not time bound)! In fact, based on my reading of discussions on the forum about it, a citizenship applicant can use a copy of the same IELTS results he/she submitted during his/her application for permanent residency some years back.

So, why do these two streams impose language requirements differently? I am not complaining. I am happy that I won't have to sit for IELTS again in order to apply for citizenship in future. I am just wondering why the rules are different. :)
 
Because for PR, at least the employment stream, language is a critical component of the ability to work and establish yourself. For citizenship, however, there are many ways of being a useful citizen, and not all of them require a formal grasp of English. Thus, lower requirements and easier standards of proof.
 
Don't forget that PR is required to apply for citizenship.
Based on that it's logic that the whole application is lighter than for PR, the work has already be done.
 
Icebergmoma said:
Don't forget that PR is required to apply for citizenship.
Based on that it's logic that the whole application is lighter than for PR, the work has already be done.

Yup exactly. That's why you don't have to take a medical either.
 
keesio said:
Yup exactly. That's why you don't have to take a medical either.
Good point.
 
that might be right for the main applicant for the pr, but not his family members. at least, when we applied in 2010, I didn't have to pass a language test. only my husband had to take the test for our application.

Icebergmoma said:
Don't forget that PR is required to apply for citizenship.
Based on that it's logic that the whole application is lighter than for PR, the work has already be done.