+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

jeet1795

Hero Member
Sep 29, 2015
212
24
Ambala
Category........
Visa Office......
Chandigarh
App. Filed.......
18 october 2017
VISA ISSUED...
21 November 2017
LANDED..........
18 December 2017
Caipes received of my last refusal when i applied on the 12th basis
Vo remarks are as follows

"Application, supporting documents, level of studies, academic ability and last educational institution considered. Concerns: Low scores in areas of study that would form core of future studies. No logical Progression of course given courses done in the past and how PA has been occupied since completion of last studies. Low English language scores in previous studies Proposed program is not reasonable in light of past studies. academic scores and language abilities. I am therefore not satisfied that applicant Is a bonafide temporary resident who will leave Canada following the completion of studies. Refused. "


My profile
10th-7.4 cgpa
12th- 60% overall
Ielts- 6.5 not less than 6

Subject-wise marks
English- 69
Economics - 42
Accountancy - 54
Business - 68

Presently i done BBA from kuk university and i scored 65% aggregate with 4 backlogs cleared in course time.
Now again i want to apply but i am worried about the chances of getting visa.
Am also in confusion whether again i go for canada or i move my plans to any other country. Please guide me
Antype of help will be appreciated
 
Low scores in areas of study that would form core of future studies. (Can't do anything. Try to prove other things you have done that helps with this course, if any) No logical Progression of course given courses done in the past and how PA has been occupied since completion of last studies (write better SOP addressing these two issues). Low English language scores in previous studies (VO just being a**hole. Try explaining how your IELTS is above the cut off of your univ requirement. Also you can argue how your English score is not bad in light of the strict scoring system of the respective exam) Proposed program is not reasonable in light of past studies (write stronger SOP, talk about future plans and how this course will help to achieve that). academic scores and language abilities. I am therefore not satisfied that applicant Is a bonafide temporary resident who will leave Canada (try to show stronger ties, pay one semester tuition fee) following the completion of studies. Refused.

Good luck!
 
good boy said:
Low scores in areas of study that would form core of future studies. (Can't do anything. Try to prove other things you have done that helps with this course, if any) No logical Progression of course given courses done in the past and how PA has been occupied since completion of last studies (write better SOP addressing these two issues). Low English language scores in previous studies (VO just being a**hole. Try explaining how your IELTS is above the cut off of your univ requirement. Also you can argue how your English score is not bad in light of the strict scoring system of the respective exam) Proposed program is not reasonable in light of past studies (write stronger SOP, talk about future plans and how this course will help to achieve that). academic scores and language abilities. I am therefore not satisfied that applicant Is a bonafide temporary resident who will leave Canada (try to show stronger ties, pay one semester tuition fee) following the completion of studies. Refused.

Good luck!
. No logical Progression of course given courses done in the past and how PA has been occupied since completion of last studies
Can u please explain What does it mean actually
 
Anyone else please help
 
jeet1795 said:
. No logical Progression of course given courses done in the past and how PA has been occupied since completion of last studies
Can u please explain What does it mean actually

PA = principal applicant
It simply means your SOP was not convincing to VO. S/he wants to see stronger correlation between your past experience and proposed program.
 
good boy said:
PA = principal applicant
It simply means your SOP was not convincing to VO. S/he wants to see stronger correlation between your past experience and proposed program.
Ok thankyou very much for solving my queries.