was refused, gonna re-aply

[rusbear]

Is anybody has an experience of re-applying.
My application was refused because sponsor did not meet the requirements.

 

[Karlshammar]

Which requirement did they not meet?

 

[rusbear]

It was less then 1 year of cohabiting (11 months). Now is 1,5

 

[Karlshammar]

Based on what you said you have overcome the barrier that kept you from being approved last time, so go ahead and re-apply.

 

[tgchi13]

Wouldn't the disqualification affect the sponsored parties application rather than the sponsors application? I mean, I was approved as sponsor in a conjugal application if I follow that logic if I was deemed to be in a conjugal relationship would it not then stand to reason that my partner was in a conjugal relationship?

If they looked at the burden of proof at the sponsor application stage then if I was approved as being a conjugal relationship with my partner how could my partner not be approved to be in the same relationship.

I thought that part of the analysis was done later in the process, but I now am confused (more confused/again).

 

[ange]

I understand your logic, but then obviously the qualifications for cohabitations difer between Mississaugua & the embassies.

 

[job_seeker]

I understand your logic, but then obviously the qualifications for cohabitations difer between Mississaugua & the embassies.

OP is probably applying as common law and as such must show a minimum of one year of living together. If rusbear and partner already had the minimum period oh living together then they can start the application process again.

 

[Karlshammar]

I believe that Mississauga does not evaluate the relationship itself, just the sponsorship part and the legal formalities to see that it is a complete and qualifying application. The evaluation of the relationship itself, and the merits of the application, is done at the diplomatic post.

 

[Karlshammar]

No, conjugal relationships require a 1 year period. Where did you get that idea from?