+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
sazzadkw said:
Hello Razz23..


DO u have his contact details? So we might text / call him.

Its better to ask for TCS tracking number if its delivered by TCS as no one will want to be flooded with calls/SMS specially when he/she is preparing for updated docs etc. :) my opinion.....
 
Arsh Ali said:
Wow the waiters are coming back from hibernation mode :) ..... one line update and the thread is showing signs of life :) .... Please God keep us blessing with such updates ....

special thanks to you for keeping the thread alive when everyone else was in hibernation.
 
Arsh Ali said:
Its better to ask for TCS tracking number if its delivered by TCS as no one will want to be flooded with calls/SMS specially when he/she is preparing for updated docs etc. :) my opinion.....

Such a great news...
 
mech said:
special thanks to you for keeping the thread alive when everyone else was in hibernation.

Every one kept it alive yar, specially those who sometimes messaged 'just to keep it up' only :)
 
Thats Good news.. :)

I hav applied for CAIPS just few days back n it will take around 30 to 40 days...I dont hav my file number as my consultant refused to provide me this information. Can anyone please tell me if i can see my file number once i recieve my caips, is it mentioned in caips?
 
Cyra said:
Thats Good news.. :)

I hav applied for CAIPS just few days back n it will take around 30 to 40 days...I dont hav my file number as my consultant refused to provide me this information. Can anyone please tell me if i can see my file number once i recieve my caips, is it mentioned in caips?

If you dont have file number, how you applied CAIPS.. If your consultant did it for you, he may map/hide it when he will share details with you....
 
eemmoo1 said:
I think these instructions are specific to "Investor Class"?


I don't think so as it's part of "RECENT INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS APPLICATION BACKLOGS".

This is no any link that reflect the "Investor Class" applicants...
 
zeshananis said:
I don't think so as it's part of "RECENT INITIATIVES TO ADDRESS APPLICATION BACKLOGS".

This is no any link that reflect the "Investor Class" applicants...

The complete sentence is read as:

For instance, with regard to investor class immigrants, immigration officers have been instructed, as a
general rule, to process applications in a two-to-one ratio; two older cases from the
backlog submitted before June 26, 2010 to one case submitted on or after
December 1, 2010


Please check again :)
 
jimmy page said:
Hmmm...he got wait letter in June, and medicals in September...just in 3 months of receiving the '6-12 month letter' ??....well, have to say, he must be one lucky chap...good for him.....
No further comments.
I agree NO COMMENTS!!!!!!!
 
eemmoo1 said:
The complete sentence is read as:

For instance, with regard to investor class immigrants, immigration officers have been instructed, as a
general rule, to process applications in a two-to-one ratio; two older cases from the
backlog submitted before June 26, 2010 to one case submitted on or after
December 1, 2010


Please check again :)

I second that ... My mistake .. Thanks for clarification ... You know This is sort of greediness :P
 
Good one....:).

zeshananis said:
CIC thumb rule to process FSW files:

general rule, to process applications in a two-to-one ratio; two older cases from the
backlog submitted before June 26, 2010 to one case submitted on or after
December 1, 2010


Source: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2012/parl/XC64-1-411-02-eng.pdf

Page Number: 13
Paragraph: 2
 
zeshananis said:
But not related to us :(

But good that added to everyone's knowledge.... Thanks God I never invested :P
 
Yes, Emmoo rightly picked the point..........Indeed it was the Greeeeeeeeeed as you mentioned that we failed to understand the complete sentence........:)

But let's hope for the best.......May be For FSW's its 3 out of 3 for pre-juner's..........Now don't say it greeed Again.........Its being Optimistic.......:)

zeshananis said:
But not related to us :(
 
WAY said:
Yes, Emmoo rightly picked the point..........Indeed it was the Greeeeeeeeeed as you mentioned that we failed to understand the complete sentence........:)

But let's hope for the best.......May be For FSW's its 3 out of 3 for pre-juner's..........Now don't say it greeed Again.........Its being Optimistic.......:)

Hahahahaha ... Lolz funny {greediness }