carl321 said:well if you make his 1st draw the 6th
then spot on
i got an ITA on 453phew
fpnc2983 said:thanks. i am not good with statistics or numbers for that matter ;D
CanadianDreams419 said:8) Hi Sasha, have you updated your simulation based on the 5th Draw ?
carl321 said:brilliant work sasha,
we were just off by 27points![]()
fpnc2983 said:correct me if i am wrong. 6th draw over and its already at 453.
this kills your statistical model that i would take 10 months for the score to drop 400?
shasha1111 said:My model is very close to the real number. The assumption i made is all ppl >600 are gone. 5th draw still have a larger amount of >600 that i did not count into my model at all.
If you see the 6th draw. it is much closer. ^^ i will modify the model again this afternoon and see what i will get.
meanwhile, a bad news. there are more ppl with pnp than i thought. that means it will takes longer to drop under 400.
shasha1111 said:Yes. the total # of ppl in the pool, as i estimated before, is around 75k. My estimation is very close.
May I ask where did you get the 8k ppl in the pool? And article from the CA gov? Would really appreciate it if you can provide some link maybe?rojiv94 said:There is only 8K ppl remaining in the pool.
75K ppl in the pool is may be your guts feeling, but it is not right.
shasha1111 said:May I ask where did you get the 8k ppl in the pool? And article from the CA gov? Would really appreciate it if you can provide some link maybe?
Thanks!
Karolis said:He assumes that excel spreadsheet is 10% of population thats all