@ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

[debonair388]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

@longwaiting... any news on your part?

Also I thing the sheet needs to be updated.

Thanks

 

[freebird3000]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

i got my latest ATIP.

i found out that "decision made " is when file gets granted and transferred to local office ( status : ceremony ready )

after that , it is up to the local office to schedule oath and etc...

ATIP shows that my file was approved on July 9th. ( my ECAS changed to decision made on July 9th)

so anyone with decision made status , just hang in there ....

 

[vinaypuri]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

Does it say, what is your local office?

i got my latest ATIP.

i found out that "decision made " is when file gets granted and transferred to local office ( status : ceremony ready )

after that , it is up to the local office to schedule oath and etc...

ATIP shows that my file was approved on July 9th. ( my ECAS changed to decision made on July 9th)

so anyone with decision made status , just hang in there ....

 

[debonair388]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

I am not sure if that DM statement is accurate...I think DM can be either negative or positive.

i got my latest ATIP.

i found out that "decision made " is when file gets granted and transferred to local office ( status : ceremony ready )

after that , it is up to the local office to schedule oath and etc...

ATIP shows that my file was approved on July 9th. ( my ECAS changed to decision made on July 9th)

so anyone with decision made status , just hang in there ....

 

[freebird3000]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

Does it say, what is your local office?

my local office changed to " Scarborough citizenship operation" on July 9th. ( file granted on the same date)
they sent me an oath letter on Aug 17th. ( almost 5 weeks )

my oath is on Aug 31st.

 

[freebird3000]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

DM is always positive ( approve and granted )

according to CIC website , if file needs any further interview with judge or citizenship officer , it will still show " in process" until the final decision is made .

 

[vinaypuri]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

my local office changed to " Scarborough citizenship operation" on July 9th. ( file granted on the same date)
they sent me an oath letter on Aug 17th. ( almost 5 weeks )

my oath is on Aug 31st.

Nice, congratulations!.

Going by your date, I might get an invite by Mid Sept.. I believe my office is Scarborough too. All the Mississauga applicants were getting invites within a week of a DM.

 

[freebird3000]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

Nice, congratulations!.

Going by your date, I might get an invite by Mid Sept.. I believe my office is Scarborough too. All the Mississauga applicants were getting invites within a week of a DM.

Thanks . since you got DM in August , then i guess you need to wait another 2-3 weeks .

my oath letter came from Scarborough but my ceremony will be taking place in Toronto ( exhibition center)

 

[strawberrylemonade]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

Thanks . since you got DM in August , then i guess you need to wait another 2-3 weeks .

my oath letter came from Scarborough but my ceremony will be taking place in Toronto ( exhibition center)

I don't think the wait time is a linear process, my status has been DM since July 17. There is still no bird shit yet.

 

[vinaypuri]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

I don't think the wait time is a linear process, my status has been DM since July 17. There is still no bird *censored word* yet.

yeah, that's true too. Considering the freebird timeline, I think you should have Oath invite by End of the week. Is your home office Scarborough too?

 

[strawberrylemonade]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

yeah, that's true too. Considering the freebird timeline, I think you should have Oath invite by End of the week. Is your home office Scarborough too?

I took my test at scarborough, so I guess it is.

Speaking of troll... I am thinking about using "aggressive" inquiry to ask for more information:

"I would like to know the current status of my application, because I am expecting an update and the online update is not always up to date. I have consulted my local member of parliament, _________, their office suggested me to call the helpline for this basic inquiry. I am wondering if you can help me. Thank you!"

Remember, always speak slow and polite. If they can't do it, ask the following:

"Considering that I am at my final stage of application, base on your professional judgment and experience, would you say that my application is declined/accepted?"

There, you just asked the helpline professionally with respect about your case. If they can't answer any of the above question, they will be, by your frame, "unable to deliver professional advices".


Hang in there and good luck!

 

[debonair388]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

Here is a link from the CIC website that explicitly states that DM could be either of 2 things. While I am optimistic as you...we need to be careful not to give people the wrong information.

https://services3.cic.gc.ca/ecas/redir.do?redir=app_gra&lang=en&app=ecas

DM is always positive ( approve and granted )

according to CIC website , if file needs any further interview with judge or citizenship officer , it will still show " in process" until the final decision is made .

 

[strawberrylemonade]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

Here is a link from the CIC website that explicitly states that DM could be either of 2 things. While I am optimistic as you...we need to be careful not to give people the wrong information.

https://services3.cic.gc.ca/ecas/redir.do?redir=app_gra&lang=en&app=ecas

In my honest opinion, if the result is negative. It won't take a long time for them to send out the letter of notification. Furthermore, there is a lot of people from this forum are on the same boat (DM and waiting with no updates), it is very unlikely that it is a bad decision, logically.

If you know you meet all the requirements (1095 days), you know you are safe.

 

[vinaypuri]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker

In my honest opinion, if the result is negative. It won't take a long time for them to send out the letter of notification. Furthermore, there is a lot of people from this forum are on the same boat (DM and waiting with no updates), it is very unlikely that it is a bad decision, logically.

If you know you meet all the requirements (1095 days), you know you are safe.

Agreed. Most of us are at ceremony ready status.

 

[vinaypuri]

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision mak

I took my test at scarborough, so I guess it is.

Speaking of troll... I am thinking about using "aggressive" inquiry to ask for more information:

"I would like to know the current status of my application, because I am expecting an update and the online update is not always up to date. I have consulted my local member of parliament, _________, their office suggested me to call the helpline for this basic inquiry. I am wondering if you can help me. Thank you!"

Remember, always speak slow and polite. If they can't do it, ask the following:

"Considering that I am at my final stage of application, base on your professional judgment and experience, would you say that my application is declined/accepted?"

There, you just asked the helpline professionally with respect about your case. If they can't answer any of the above question, they will be, by your frame, "unable to deliver professional advices".


Hang in there and good luck!

lol .. love the idea.