Thank you again for the insightful comments @dpenabill
Edit - in particular when you call out that folks like jurists and aren't necessarily or automatically equipped to better understand the instructions better than the rest of us.
I consider what you wrote here,
I also wrote that there were a couple of points where I respectfully disagreed - but actually they're just different examples of the above point.
In other words, now that it's clear that we both agree on the fact that "More than a few statements in the instructions are outright NOT accurate" then we've come full circle and are in fact in complete agreement.
I don't have anything more to add to your post, aside from reiterating that they're very insightful and that I'm in complete agreement with what you wrote.
Edit - in particular when you call out that folks like jurists and aren't necessarily or automatically equipped to better understand the instructions better than the rest of us.
I consider what you wrote here,
to be equivalent to what I originally wrote earlier,More than a few statements in the instructions are outright NOT accurate.
To be fair the instructions are worded a bit confusingly in some places.
I also wrote that there were a couple of points where I respectfully disagreed - but actually they're just different examples of the above point.
In other words, now that it's clear that we both agree on the fact that "More than a few statements in the instructions are outright NOT accurate" then we've come full circle and are in fact in complete agreement.
I don't have anything more to add to your post, aside from reiterating that they're very insightful and that I'm in complete agreement with what you wrote.
