REFUSED Pre-June 10 Cases (JDs Mismatch) Want to Appeal, Connect Here

[Zee81]

Hi,

Those Pre-June 2010 cases which are Refused due to 'Job Duties Mismatch' please connect here.... We all need to File an appeal in Canadian Court to sue CIC for this unfair behaviour.... The charges will be as low as more applicants are gathered.... You need to have strong and relevant Experience letters matching with Jds of your NOC....

My Time lines are as under:

Applicant Initial Application to CIC Ist AOR Full Documents 2nd AOR Refusal

Zee81 March 25, 2010 May 27, 2010 July 05, 2010 July 27, 2010 May 22, 2012
Rizwan72 June 15, 2010 October 17, 2010 Jan 05, 2011 July 10, 2011 May 5, 2012

 

[rizwan72]

I like the idea of combined appeal.


My Time lines are as under:

Initial Application to CIC Ist AOR Full Documents 2nd AOR Refusal

June 15, 2010 October 17, 2010 Jan 05, 2011 July 10, 2011 May 5, 2012

 

[Zee81]

I like the idea of combined appeal.


My Time lines are as under:

Initial Application to CIC Ist AOR Full Documents 2nd AOR Refusal

June 15, 2010 October 17, 2010 Jan 05, 2011 July 10, 2011 May 5, 2012

Thanks added in the list...

Please send me your email address through personal message and i will share the details of filling an appeal with you..

 

[starme]

there is no such thing exist in canadian laws, its just that if u give bulk cases
to the lawyer, he may reduce his/her fee a little but how he/she would spend
quality time on all the cases.
its a million dollar question, thx.

for ur kind info they jst represent the case in the court, an assistant of them prepares the case.

I like the idea of combined appeal.


My Time lines are as under:

Initial Application to CIC Ist AOR Full Documents 2nd AOR Refusal

June 15, 2010 October 17, 2010 Jan 05, 2011 July 10, 2011 May 5, 2012

 

[Zee81]

there is no such thing exist in canadian laws, its just that if u give bulk cases
to the lawyer, he may reduce his/her fee a little but how he/she would spend
quality time on all the cases.
its a million dollar question, thx.

for ur kind info they jst represent the case in the court, an assistant of them prepares the case.

I do not agree that there is no law in Canada to appeal against such rejected cases due to baseless reasons.... Tim Leahy is a crediable Canadian Lawyer and his efforts partially forced CIC to at least review the MI-1 cases....

Everyone has his own ideas but i strongly believe that if all refused pre-June 10 cases due to baseless reason of JDs mismatch can file a case collectively it can be successful as such a reason to reject bulk of cases had never happened earlier I suppose....

Look at my case I am Civil Engineer with 10 years experience and rejected due to Jds mismatch.... NOC 0711 is for Civil engineers / Construction Managers Who else...... Can anyone answer???? :'( :'( :'(

This is totally unfair on behalf of CIC and a way to reduce the backlog nothing else......

 

[hoquejamal]

I do not agree that there is no law in Canada to appeal against such rejected cases due to baseless reasons.... Tim Leahy is a crediable Canadian Lawyer and his efforts partially forced CIC to at least review the MI-1 cases....

Everyone has his own ideas but i strongly believe that if all refused pre-June 10 cases due to baseless reason of JDs mismatch can file a case collectively it can be successful as such a reason to reject bulk of cases had never happened earlier I suppose....

Look at my case I am Civil Engineer with 10 years experience and rejected due to Jds mismatch.... NOC 0711 is for Civil engineers / Construction Managers Who else...... Can anyone answer???? :'( :'( :'(

This is totally unfair on behalf of CIC and a way to reduce the backlog nothing else......

Dear friend,
I am very sorry to learn about the refusal.
Did you ever get in-process in your e-case??? What does your e-case show? How did you get the refusal letter?

May god be by your side.

 

[Zee81]

Dear friend,
I am very sorry to learn about the refusal.
Did you ever get in-process in your e-case??? What does your e-case show? How did you get the refusal letter?

May god be by your side.

Got In Process with same RBVO details since Jan. 2011, my e-case suddenly showed 'Decision made' few days back.... letter through normal post..

 

[hoquejamal]

Got In Process with same RBVO details since Jan. 2011, my e-case suddenly showed 'Decision made' few days back.... letter through normal post..

Thanks for your kind reply.

 

[azfarbaig]

Dear Sir,

Please find below my information.

Applicant Initial Application to CIC Ist AOR Full Documents 2nd AOR Refusal

azfarbaig April 28, 2010 Oct 08, 2010 Feb 01, 2011 Jun 27, 2011 May 10, 2012


BR//

AZFAR

 

[Zee81]

Dear Sir,

Please find below my information.

Applicant Initial Application to CIC Ist AOR Full Documents 2nd AOR Refusal

azfarbaig April 28, 2010 Oct 08, 2010 Feb 01, 2011 Jun 27, 2011 May 10, 2012


BR//

AZFAR

Thanks added in the list...

Please send me your email address through personal message and i will share the details of filling an appeal with you..

 

[Zee81]

Updated list;



S.NO NOC Name INITIAL APPLICATION TO CIC Ist AOR FULL DOCUMENTS 2ND AOR REFUSAL
1 0711 Zee81 25/03/10 27/05/10 5/7/2010 27/07/10 22/05/12
2 0213 Rizwan72 15/06/10 17/10/10 5/1/2011 10/7/2011 5/5/2012
3 0213 Azfarbaig 28/04/10 8/10/2010 1/2/2011 27/6/2011 10/5/2012

 

[starme]

u misinterpreted me,


1. If you go for judicial review collectively, who would assure that cases wud be taken seriously.
2. generally, Judges dont interfere in such decisions based on Job Duties because Canadian law suggests
that the VO is expert in this field, hence, judges give very high deference to his decision.

here, Im not sayin that JD cases cant be challenged, u can challenge that but u sud have solid proof
to show that ur JDs are very similar as laid out by hrsdc.

tc

Updated list;



S.NO NOC Name INITIAL APPLICATION TO CIC Ist AOR FULL DOCUMENTS 2ND AOR REFUSAL
1 0711 Zee81 25/03/10 27/05/10 5/7/2010 27/07/10 22/05/12
2 0213 Rizwan72 15/06/10 17/10/10 5/1/2011 10/7/2011 5/5/2012
3 0213 Azfarbaig 28/04/10 8/10/2010 1/2/2011 27/6/2011 10/5/2012

 

[Zee81]

u misinterpreted me,


1. If you go for judicial review collectively, who would assure that cases wud be taken seriously.
2. generally, Judges dont interfere in such decisions based on Job Duties because Canadian law suggests
that the VO is expert in this field, hence, judges give very high deference to his decision.

here, Im not sayin that JD cases cant be challenged, u can challenge that but u sud have solid proof
to show that ur JDs are very similar as laid out by hrsdc.

tc

Sure we need to produce Jds similar and making a Logical link with HRSDC's Job duties... but the question is how we can produce 'Word to Word' match unless we make a fake letter??


Actually they are refusing the cases mostly because they are not satisfied with the JDs matching to HRSDC and on the other hand also turning those cases down whose JDs EXACTLY match with their's.... What does it mean..... Only that they want to finish the MI-1 backlog by hook or by crock.... and this we can challenge i suppose.....

 

[starme]

@zee81

I make u understand in hindi wat I meant.

JR ek achi option hein, agar aap fight karna chahte hein toh.
point ye thaa, kee joh lawyer bulk cases lega, is baat kee kya gurantee kee woh inko ache se handle karega,
recently, ek lawyer ne, 9 cases lodge kiye, ek hee ground this sabki, court ne sabhi ko dismiss kar diya.

meri baat kee bareeki ko samaghiye.

thx.

Sure we need to produce Jds similar and making a Logical link with HRSDC's Job duties... but the question is how we can produce 'Word to Word' match unless we make a fake letter??


Actually they are refusing the cases mostly because they are not satisfied with the JDs matching to HRSDC and on the other hand also turning those cases down whose JDs EXACTLY match with their's.... What does it mean..... Only that they want to finish the MI-1 backlog by hook or by crock.... and this we can challenge i suppose.....

 

[zakout76]

question/
before u recived refuse letter did u send case inqury? if yes what they reply?

pls advice
thanks