>>>>>>>OCTOBER 2020 AOR<<<<<<< Join here
- Thread starter legalfalcon
- Start date
Got my GCMS notes yesterday.
@legalfalcon seeking your valuable comments.
Based on the data do you think my eligibility is conclusively passed?
so far we know FCC countries are UK, Aus, NZ,USA, Canada in my GCMS- information sharing section I haven't found any data on UK is it okay or not?
TIA
AOR: 28.10.2020
Eligibility: Passed
Security: Not Started
HRIV:
Criminality: Passed
Org. Crime:
Medical Passed: Passed
Misresentation:
Info Sharing: Complete (FCC- NZL, AUS, USA) NRT
Other Reqs:
Final:
NOTES: 5
Created Date: 2021/01/14 07:27:42
Created By:
Updated Date: 2021/01/14 07:27:57
Updated By:
Restricted: No
Label: EE Eligibility
Office: Centralized Intake Office
Text:
A11.2 - CASE PROCESSING AGENT: Lock-in Date: 2020-10-28 _ PA: - EE FSW Having analyzed this application based on the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file, make the following recommendation.
A11.2: Met R75: FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS - Met R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FSW POINTS: APPEARS TO MEET R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FUNDS: APPEARS TO MEET FSW points total: 70 Ready to Finalize RPRF: Complete. Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) CRS Score at invitation to apply (ITA) 471 CRS points minimum score for round: 471 CRS score at application (APR): 471 Total CRS Points Assessed: 471 I have reviewed the following for CRS points: PA gained points as MARRIED at ITA and APR PA gained points for 3+ year(s) Foreign
Work Experience with "…….."
INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): No trace for all other than present application
NOTES: 6
Created Date: 2020/12/04 08:04:12
Created By:
Updated Date: 2020/12/04 08:04:18
Updated By:
Restricted: No
Label: EE Eligibility
Office: Centralized Intake Office
Text:
REVIEW TYPE: Program Assistant APPLICATION #: REGULATION: FSW I have reviewed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. MIN.SCORE: 471 CRS SCORE: 471 Principal Applicant Application Promoted: New UCI Spouse Application Promoted: New UCI Dep 1 Application Promoted: New UCI Primary Applicant Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Spouse Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Dep 1 Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Client Fees: Verified ----- LANGUAGES----- Principal Applicant 1 -English- IELTS and Met Threshold & Verified Spouse 1 - English- IELTS and Verified ----- EDUCATION----- Primary Applicant 1-ECA report Verified on issuing agency
Website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as Master's degree Foreign credential provided Spouse 1-ECA report Verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as Master's degree Foreign credential provided ----- POLICE CERTIFICATE----- Primary Applicant 1-
____ police certificate: Provided-NRT R10 OK Recommendation: Pass Criminality Spouse 1- police certificate: Provided-NRT R10 OK Recommendation: Pass Criminality ----- AGE----- Applicant's age reviewed and Changed from ITA to e-APR DOCUMENTS SET FOR REVIEW: Client Information
@legalfalcon seeking your valuable comments.
Based on the data do you think my eligibility is conclusively passed?
so far we know FCC countries are UK, Aus, NZ,USA, Canada in my GCMS- information sharing section I haven't found any data on UK is it okay or not?
TIA
AOR: 28.10.2020
Eligibility: Passed
Security: Not Started
HRIV:
Criminality: Passed
Org. Crime:
Medical Passed: Passed
Misresentation:
Info Sharing: Complete (FCC- NZL, AUS, USA) NRT
Other Reqs:
Final:
NOTES: 5
Created Date: 2021/01/14 07:27:42
Created By:
Updated Date: 2021/01/14 07:27:57
Updated By:
Restricted: No
Label: EE Eligibility
Office: Centralized Intake Office
Text:
A11.2 - CASE PROCESSING AGENT: Lock-in Date: 2020-10-28 _ PA: - EE FSW Having analyzed this application based on the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file, make the following recommendation.
A11.2: Met R75: FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS - Met R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FSW POINTS: APPEARS TO MEET R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FUNDS: APPEARS TO MEET FSW points total: 70 Ready to Finalize RPRF: Complete. Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) CRS Score at invitation to apply (ITA) 471 CRS points minimum score for round: 471 CRS score at application (APR): 471 Total CRS Points Assessed: 471 I have reviewed the following for CRS points: PA gained points as MARRIED at ITA and APR PA gained points for 3+ year(s) Foreign
Work Experience with "…….."
INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): No trace for all other than present application
NOTES: 6
Created Date: 2020/12/04 08:04:12
Created By:
Updated Date: 2020/12/04 08:04:18
Updated By:
Restricted: No
Label: EE Eligibility
Office: Centralized Intake Office
Text:
REVIEW TYPE: Program Assistant APPLICATION #: REGULATION: FSW I have reviewed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. MIN.SCORE: 471 CRS SCORE: 471 Principal Applicant Application Promoted: New UCI Spouse Application Promoted: New UCI Dep 1 Application Promoted: New UCI Primary Applicant Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Spouse Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Dep 1 Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Client Fees: Verified ----- LANGUAGES----- Principal Applicant 1 -English- IELTS and Met Threshold & Verified Spouse 1 - English- IELTS and Verified ----- EDUCATION----- Primary Applicant 1-ECA report Verified on issuing agency
Website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as Master's degree Foreign credential provided Spouse 1-ECA report Verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as Master's degree Foreign credential provided ----- POLICE CERTIFICATE----- Primary Applicant 1-
____ police certificate: Provided-NRT R10 OK Recommendation: Pass Criminality Spouse 1- police certificate: Provided-NRT R10 OK Recommendation: Pass Criminality ----- AGE----- Applicant's age reviewed and Changed from ITA to e-APR DOCUMENTS SET FOR REVIEW: Client Information
D
Deleted member 994371
Guest
Your eligibilty has not been reviewed by an officer yet. It is still recommended pass.
BUT IT WAS WRITTEN AS PASSED. WILL PLEASE CLARIFY WHY DO YOU THINK ITS RECOMMENDED PASSED.
D
Deleted member 994371
Guest
Straight from legalfalcon's mouth:
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/january-2020-aor.671226/page-267#post-8817134
Most FSW people have their eligibility as recommended pass right now as our applications aren't being processed any further due to the virus.
The officer will most likely go with the agent's recommendation and mark your eligibility as conclusively passed when the time comes to review the application. Or so everyone keeps saying. You are almost there.
- Sep 21, 2015
- 9,896
- Category........
- FSW
- Visa Office......
- Ottawa
- NOC Code......
- 4112
- App. Filed.......
- 03-09-2015
- Doc's Request.
- 01-10-2015
- AOR Received.
- 03-09-2015
- Med's Done....
- 17-08-2015
- Passport Req..
- 05-04-2016
- VISA ISSUED...
- 12-04-2016
- LANDED..........
- 05-05-2016
Based on the notes you have shared, your eligibility is not yet conclusively passed. Once it is conclusively passed, you will see a note from an officer. and it will look like this: #4,004
Another indicator is that your security will show up as blank, which indicates that it is either in progress or passed. To read on security, see
https://bit.ly/3apWglN
No need to be concerned about info sharing, it will be done is not so already. Check the activities section in the GCMS.
How did u come to know about this current update regarding ur application ?
D
Deleted member 994371
Guest
D
Deleted member 994371
Guest
Do you not have a master's degree? It says you have a bachelor's and one-year college level certificate. Are you sure that's all you included in your ECA report?
- Sep 21, 2015
- 9,896
- Category........
- FSW
- Visa Office......
- Ottawa
- NOC Code......
- 4112
- App. Filed.......
- 03-09-2015
- Doc's Request.
- 01-10-2015
- AOR Received.
- 03-09-2015
- Med's Done....
- 17-08-2015
- Passport Req..
- 05-04-2016
- VISA ISSUED...
- 12-04-2016
- LANDED..........
- 05-05-2016
The notes https://ibb.co/F4rY05P is your R10 note, or the completeness check note.
The https://ibb.co/2ZMdzr7 is your eligibility note and as per this you have review required for the following:
A11.2 is eligibility which is your CRS,
R75 is MEC - all applicants need 67 out of max 100 to meet MEC.
R76 refers to MEC, i.e. 76 points
R75 is the eligibly for FSW.
Based on the note, the only 421 points could be verified.
Here is my old post on RR:
Understanding “Review Required”
A lot of applicants see “review required” in their GCMS notes for eligibility. There are many theories floating around with regard to what “review required” means and if it is alarming.
Before I venture into explaining the significance, it is important to understand that each application goes through the following stages as per the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and the regulations (Canadian Immigration Law):
R10 – Completeness Check
Criminality
Medicals
A11.2 – eligibility
Security
Out of the above, the most important stage is eligibility. This is also the most time-consuming stage because your documents have to be verified, evaluated and assessed to ascertain that you meet the eligibility criteria for the program you have applied (FSW / CEC / FTW). To stream line this process and make it easier for an immigration officer (decision making authority), all applications are first evaluated by case analysts or program assistants. They review the documents and summarize it in the GCMS. If they have any concerns with any document or want the immigration officer to carefully look into a specific document, they will flag it as “review required.” It is the content of the note that is important here. If the review required is for a specific document, while the summary of the note says that an applicant has met the eligibility, or “ready to finalize” it simply means that while the applicant has met the eligibility criteria, but the specific document needs a careful examination form the officer before promoting (eligibility pass) by the officer.
However, if there are concerns, there will be a review required for the eligibility, and there will be no text to the effect “ready to finalize” or pass. The note will specifically state job duties do not match, or the employment cannot be verified, or the number of years of work experience claimed cannot be verified. This is where an application can land in muddy waters. But the final decision rests on the immigration officer. He may override the decision of the analyst / assistant or go with the analysis of the analyst / assistant.
Even in cases where the analyst / assistant is of the opinion that the applicant has met the eligibility, and there is no “review required,” the officer can replace it with his own opinion. Though rare, but it does happen. This is why the eligibility is only passed when an officer conclusively marks the eligibility as passed.
Finally, there is “review required” for PoF. This is the most common in many applications. This is because, the financial and banking practices of each country are different. Eg. Fixed deposits are know as Certificate of Deposit (CD) in the US. Similarly, treasury bonds, mutual funds, stocks, and many other investment vehicles are there. If your PoF anything other than a bank deposit, it is more likely that it will be marked as “review required.” Also, IRCC does not go by day to day fluctuations in FOREX. Instead, the Canadian federal government issued a quarterly conversion rate for all FOREX vis-a-via CAD. If your PoF is in a foreign currency, then you may have “review required” for the officer to make a determination.
Just because you have “review required” does not mean that you hit the panic mode. Instead, read the context in which it is there. If there is a concern regarding a document, you can send a replacement document via CSE. The most common reasons for RR are:
1. Work reference letter without job duties
2. Work reference letters missing all the details requested by IRCC
3. If you submitted a letter from a colleague because you were unable to get one from your employer, but did not have a LoE on file, this too will lead to RR.
4. Not sufficient work experience in the primary NOC.
5. Inability to verify your employment as your employer details are missing.
There are just some of the scenarios.
D
Deleted member 994371
Guest
Wouldn't you agree that his education qualification is holding him back 50 points? He only has a bachelor degree and one year advance degree. He must have assumed his one year degree as a master's and hence the gap in points.
- Sep 21, 2015
- 9,896
- Category........
- FSW
- Visa Office......
- Ottawa
- NOC Code......
- 4112
- App. Filed.......
- 03-09-2015
- Doc's Request.
- 01-10-2015
- AOR Received.
- 03-09-2015
- Med's Done....
- 17-08-2015
- Passport Req..
- 05-04-2016
- VISA ISSUED...
- 12-04-2016
- LANDED..........
- 05-05-2016
That would depend on what he entered in the application, his ECA assessment and the points allocated, also available the profile.
Merely based on the note, we cannot assume, unless these details are provided.