There is no cause for concern in your situation. You did the correct thing by including your spouse’s master’s program in her personal history section, even though she did not complete the course. The personal history section of the IMM 5669 form is meant to account for every activity and time period, whether completed or not, so indicating that she studied at a university for her master’s degree during that time is exactly right. The education section, on the other hand, is generally meant for completed formal education — programs for which a degree, diploma, or certificate was awarded. Since your spouse did not finish her master’s program, it is acceptable that you did not list it there. IRCC officers are mainly looking for consistency between sections and no unexplained gaps in the timeline. The fact that the studies are shown in the personal history means you have been transparent, and that’s what matters most. If you want to be extra cautious, you could include a brief Letter of Explanation clarifying that the master’s program was not completed, which is why it does not appear under education, but this is not required. Overall, your approach is accurate and should not create any issue in your application.Hi, @Miss bee I also have another question concerning the Imm 5669, my spouse didn’t complete her university masters course and I indicated that in her personal history section, however I didn’t mention that in her educational section because she didn’t complete the course. Is there a cause for concern here? Thank you
	