+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
spicey said:
@ Ladapo4luv ,

Kindly add Dr.Ezinne to In process group.

Thank you

Also add Kanadamine to In Proccess Group too pls.
 
IN PROCESS GROUP

1. Madam Tinu - Feb. 3rd
2. ladapo4luv - Feb. 2nd
3. Kscider - feb. 1st
4. Tokzeees -
5. Dr. Ezinne -
6. Kanadamine -
7.

MR/RPRF
1. **
2.

PPR.

1. **
2.
 
Below are updates with respect to those pursuing legal proceedings against the CIC for warehousing applications.

FWS Processing
8 February 2012


June 5th has been provisionally set for the Court to hear opposing arguments. The Court will likely defer rending its decision until a later date. The decision will only apply to those who have joined the litigation before June 5th.



7 February 2012


Total litigants: 655. Others may join the litigation.

The Court ratified the written agreement between the parties that (a) we would argue one case per class while the other cases are deferred and, if we succeed, (b) CIC "will be guided by the decisions in the representative cases" in handling the other litigant's FSW applications. Although CIC's phrasing gives it some wiggle room, the judge deciding the representative cases will be empowered to require CIC to process the other 653 cases on the same terms as is ordered for the representative cases (and will be aware that CIC has provisionally agreed to do so). The Court's orders will apply only to the (655) applicants who are participating in the litigation.

Class I; i.e., those who applied before 27 February 2008; comprises roughly 75% of the litigants. The representative cases arises out of Beijing and concerns an IT manager whom a visa officer found in March 2010 meets selection criteria and who received maximum points for English.

Class II; i.e., those who applied between 27 February 2008 and 25 June 2010; is represented by a case lodged in New Delhi. The litigant is a nurse, whose IELTS results were 6.5., 7.5, 8.5 and 8.5; her husband holds a B.Com. and is a bookkeeper.
 
spicey said:
Dear Comrades,

Please,does anyone know about the Status of Omoge and Cerrutti's Permanent Residence Submissions after their Re-MEDICALS?

Am just praying to God for Perfection of their PR Visas.

Thank you Spicey for your concern and prayers, I actually went through a second re-medicals, my file was furthered twice. I have since last year(Dec) passed all the tests they asked for, still waiting to hear from them. ECAS still shows ''In process''.
I haven't heard from CERRUTTI, I guess he is making progress too.
I wish you all the best, ''sweetner sister'' :-*

Congrats to ALL who have gone ''IN PROCESS, Happy PR year!
 
ofonzo said:
Below are updates with respect to those pursuing legal proceedings against the CIC for warehousing applications.

FWS Processing
8 February 2012


June 5th has been provisionally set for the Court to hear opposing arguments. The Court will likely defer rending its decision until a later date. The decision will only apply to those who have joined the litigation before June 5th.



7 February 2012


Total litigants: 655. Others may join the litigation.

The Court ratified the written agreement between the parties that (a) we would argue one case per class while the other cases are deferred and, if we succeed, (b) CIC "will be guided by the decisions in the representative cases" in handling the other litigant's FSW applications. Although CIC's phrasing gives it some wiggle room, the judge deciding the representative cases will be empowered to require CIC to process the other 653 cases on the same terms as is ordered for the representative cases (and will be aware that CIC has provisionally agreed to do so). The Court's orders will apply only to the (655) applicants who are participating in the litigation.

Class I; i.e., those who applied before 27 February 2008; comprises roughly 75% of the litigants. The representative cases arises out of Beijing and concerns an IT manager whom a visa officer found in March 2010 meets selection criteria and who received maximum points for English.

Class II; i.e., those who applied between 27 February 2008 and 25 June 2010; is represented by a case lodged in New Delhi. The litigant is a nurse, whose IELTS results were 6.5., 7.5, 8.5 and 8.5; her husband holds a B.Com. and is a bookkeeper.

As far as I can see its a welcome development. I have a feeling they will succeed. Something has to happen to put these folks on their toes.

They are simply collecting people's money to run their inefficient department and the rest of the world to look stupid. after these set of litigants succeed, there will be more boldness from the teeming thousand waiting and waiting.

And I can predict that they will coin up phrase in their form to be signed by all applicant, in a manner that will make it difficult for others to challenge them in the court.

Our brethren in the forum here had since sued them, by laying the matter before the God of all flesh. And prayer are still been organised to let loose the rain of MR's and PPR's.

As for me. I pray that I will be recruited as their contractor for processing, while they will just be doing the pasting of the visas for all names forwarded from my office.

Guess whose Passport I will request first and foremost???? I wont tell if you don't ask.
 
OMOGE said:
Thank you Spicey for your concern and prayers, I actually went through a second re-medicals, my file was furthered twice. I have since last year(Dec) passed all the tests they asked for, still waiting to hear from them. ECAS still shows ''In process''.
I haven't heard from CERRUTTI, I guess he is making progress too.
I wish you all the best, ''sweetner sister'' :-*

Congrats to ALL who have gone ''IN PROCESS, Happy PR year!

Start packing your bags for the remainder of the winter. your PPR is on the way. I was actually mistaking you for omoelle.
 
EMO said:
Start packing your bags for the remainder of the winter. your PPR is on the way. I was actually mistaking you for omoelle.

Thanks EMO, I pray it turns out as you have predicted.

No wahala about the mistaken identity, OMOGE or OMOELLE, na same, same we are both chikitos, lol :D
 
ladapo4luv said:
IN PROCESS GROUP

1. Madam Tinu - Feb. 3rd
2. ladapo4luv - Feb. 2nd
3. Kscider - feb. 1st
4. Tokzeees -
5. Dr. Ezinne -
6. Kanadamine -
7.

MR/RPRF
1. **
2.

PPR.

1. **
2.
Good work Ladapo, is there anyone in the 'in process' group who applied after June 2010? Or Accra is currently focusing on pre-juners?
Mandie
 
ladapo4luv said:
IN PROCESS GROUP

1. Madam Tinu - Feb. 3rd
2. ladapo4luv - Feb. 2nd
3. Kscider - feb. 1st
4. Tokzeees -
5. Dr. Ezinne -
6. Kanadamine -
7.

MR/RPRF
1. **
2.

PPR.

1. **
2.

Congratulations to you guys and may these lists grow longer for all categories IJN. Amen :P


EMO said:
As far as I can see its a welcome development. I have a feeling they will succeed. Something has to happen to put these folks on their toes.

They are simply collecting people's money to run their inefficient department and the rest of the world to look stupid. after these set of litigants succeed, there will be more boldness from the teeming thousand waiting and waiting.

And I can predict that they will coin up phrase in their form to be signed by all applicant, in a manner that will make it difficult for others to challenge them in the court.

Our brethren in the forum here had since sued them, by laying the matter before the God of all flesh. And prayer are still been organised to let loose the rain of MR's and PPR's.

As for me. I pray that I will be recruited as their contractor for processing, while they will just be doing the pasting of the visas for all names forwarded from my office.

Guess whose Passport I will request first and foremost???? I wont tell if you don't ask.

@ EMO, I am dying to know ???

OMOGE said:
Thank you Spicey for your concern and prayers, I actually went through a second re-medicals, my file was furthered twice. I have since last year(Dec) passed all the tests they asked for, still waiting to hear from them. ECAS still shows ''In process''.
I haven't heard from CERRUTTI, I guess he is making progress too.
I wish you all the best, ''sweetner sister'' :-*

Congrats to ALL who have gone ''IN PROCESS, Happy PR year!

@ OMOGE, hang in there; God will perfect it, IJN :)
 
EMO,

I agree with your thinking but there is a likelihood that immigration policy may shift towards Pre-2008 applications. House of Commons report on the backlog is due any minute now.
 
spokes said:
@ OMOGE, hang in there; God will perfect it, IJN :)

Amen!!!. Thanks sis :-*. Yours has been signed and ready for delivery.
 
OMOGE said:
Amen!!!. Thanks sis :-*. Yours has been signed and ready for delivery.

Amen :)
 
ofonzo said:
EMO,

I agree with your thinking but there is a likelihood that immigration policy may shift towards Pre-2008 applications. House of Commons report on the backlog is due any minute now.

What I think will work is to halt the in-take of new applications for the next 4 years. This will allow for time and space to clear the backlogs. This will also portray them to be fair and having level of integrity.
If there policy allows for 0.25millions intake annually, then in the suggested 4 years all backlogs will have been cleared. I heard that they do send mails to some applicants asking them if they are still interested? which means they are actually expecting some folks to grow weary of waiting, and as a result fall out of the backlogs. Having their money for years without any returns. Oyinbos are the meanest crook on earth.
 
Dear comrade

URGENT ANSWER IS REQUIRED----


I want to add my sister -in-law to my application as Dependant.
She is 30 years old , and posses a Bsc. degree
How can I proceed with this case
What document can I , or and She provide
Other what title do I call this--- as Dependant or what?

I submitted my full doc on Nov 2010 and I am yet to hear from Accra

Thank you all
 
thejackson said:
Dear comrade

URGENT ANSWER IS REQUIRED----


I want to add my sister -in-law to my application as Dependant.
She is 30 years old , and posses a Bsc. degree
How can I proceed with this case
What document can I , or and She provide
Other what title do I call this--- as Dependant or what?

I submitted my full doc on Nov 2010 and I am yet to hear from Accra

Thank you all
I am doubtful you can add someone above 22 (without a medical condition) as a dependent. In the guide this is the only reference to someone above 22:
"The child is 22 years of age or older, has depended substantially on the financial support of a parent since before the age of 22, and is unable to provide for himself or herself because of a medical condition". Maybe someone has a better interpretation

Mandie