NEW DELHI - 2013 APPLICANTS.

[aroundwrd99]

Ok..
Rksandhu no its not true if u see in Bombay pune banglore its very common for people to stay together.

Agreed.

But according to him nobody stays in India together without marriage.

 

[Vijender_Rana]

He rejected files before?

We had any documents together... joint account in India and Canada. I used to live in Canada before. I had a car together with my spouse. We were very strong on documentary proof. We had total 14 trips together since we met.

Still he felt it was entered in bath faith...He feels I have created all these proof since 2011.

How I can create proof for 3 years? that's funny...

you guys are married now, right ?

 

[aroundwrd99]

sorry about interviewers bad behavior. ..so u guys not married. it is ok in foreign countries...but in India people not totally approved it...hope for d best he will approved ur case...
ur interview was in new delhi or Chandigarh. .?

We are married for the last 18 months... we lived together before without marriage in India as well.

 

[waiting 2 exhale]

True....
They hv problems if we live together , they have problems if we dont live together.
Do they have some criteria or not...

nope...it is upto the visa officer and too bad it was an indian guy with old fashioned views interviewed him...canadians are cool with any kind of relationship (other than involving minor of course)...they have problems if a man married a woman and goes back to canada; if a man stays with his wife in india for more than a year; if a woman is older than a man; if they were divorced before; alternate lifestyle ...and the list is endless..i guess rama and sita won't be able to get visa since sita did not live with rama....

 

[fakename]

guysss i assumes dat mostly people got visa in average 8-9 mnths time................. we are jst few applicants of each mnth on dis forum .......

Hello Avneet,
The time quoted by NDVO is not the average time, but as their site states It's the time "it took to process 80 percent of all cases between January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013."

So 20% of the applicants experienced longer time.

 

[Vijender_Rana]

We are married for the last 18 months... we lived together before without marriage in India as well.

then what is the issue........ don't know..... how NDVOs work..no body can predict....

 

[rash04]

nope...it is upto the visa officer and too bad it was an indian guy with old fashioned views interviewed him...canadians are cool with any kind of relationship (other than involving minor of course)...they have problems if a man married a woman and goes back to canada; if a man stays with his wife in india for more than a year; if a woman is older than a man; if they were divorced before; alternate lifestyle ...and the list is endless..i guess rama and sita won't be able to get visa since sita did not live with rama....

Hope for best...

 

[rksandhu]

Ok..
Rksandhu no its not true if u see in Bombay pune banglore its very common for people to stay together.

I m not saying it is not true. ..I m just say dat we live in Indian society now every family is educated dese days but still is taboo about it...society still comment on dese type of relations..as well as dis sikh guy commented...if dis is an foreign land then interviewer see d proofs and issue his visa..

 

[waiting 2 exhale]

He rejected files before?

We had any documents together... joint account in India and Canada. I used to live in Canada before. I had a car together with my spouse. We were very strong on documentary proof. We had total 14 trips together since we met.

Still he felt it was entered in bath faith...He feels I have created all these proof since 2011.

How I can create proof for 3 years? that's funny...

there were two cases that he had rejected applicants after interview because they don't fit in with the conventional family style of marriage; 3 children; 2.5 mother in laws; cats and dogs; 1.3 house and 2.5 cars...idiots...yeah right!!since 2011 you carefully created an application with full proof measures like renting a house together; taking trips together; buying a car together; only thing you didn't do is get married then but married now...so if a person does not believe in marriage but does everything a married couple does and they live together for 14 years, this moron would think never mind you lived for 14 years but you are not married yet...if a person wants to cheat he/she can do it perfectly without raising any suspicions...morons...i am baffled you are married now so however you lived before the marriage how is it relevant to the case?

 

[waiting 2 exhale]

Yea he came back and we were together for 52 days again because during wedding due to job commitment he has to fly back in 10 days.

Yes our family were part of our wedding
Yea v both talkk everyday on tango, watsapp, phone call i hv all in email.
I'm 2014 applivant so finger crossed...amen...

nothing to worry about..first of all you won't get interview anyway...

 

[aroundwrd99]

I m not saying it is not true. ..I m just say dat we live in Indian society now every family is educated dese days but still is taboo about it...society still comment on dese type of relations..as well as dis sikh guy commented...if dis is an foreign land then interviewer see d proofs and issue his visa..

Let see...

 

[rksandhu]

nope...it is upto the visa officer and too bad it was an indian guy with old fashioned views interviewed him...canadians are cool with any kind of relationship (other than involving minor of course)...they have problems if a man married a woman and goes back to canada; if a man stays with his wife in india for more than a year; if a woman is older than a man; if they were divorced before; alternate lifestyle ...and the list is endless..i guess rama and sita won't be able to get visa since sita did not live with rama....

totally agreed. ..these morons just ordered GCMS notes whether they have brains or not...

 

[aroundwrd99]

there were two cases that he had rejected applicants after interview because they don't fit in with the conventional family style of marriage; 3 children; 2.5 mother in laws; cats and dogs; 1.3 house and 2.5 cars...idiots...yeah right!!since 2011 you carefully created an application with full proof measures like renting a house together; taking trips together; buying a car together; only thing you didn't do is get married then but married now...so if a person does not believe in marriage but does everything a married couple does and they live together for 14 years, this moron would think never mind you lived for 14 years but you are not married yet...if a person wants to cheat he/she can do it perfectly without raising any suspicions...morons...i am baffled you are married now so however you lived before the marriage how is it relevant to the case?

He was a visa officer... but at last he was a Sikh Person from the Indian origin... My preference was white person not an Indian origin person for the interview. They are smart on right side.

Indian officer are smart on wrong side..

Everybody knows; Indian origin persons are very rude. They feel they are the best immigration officer and smart officers.

 

[CANVISA770]

Let see...

Sorry to ask was marriage attended by your close families ? Many things matter....how did interview go ? Did you answer all questions ? Did you provide photographs ?

 

[aroundwrd99]

there were two cases that he had rejected applicants after interview because they don't fit in with the conventional family style of marriage; 3 children; 2.5 mother in laws; cats and dogs; 1.3 house and 2.5 cars...idiots...yeah right!!since 2011 you carefully created an application with full proof measures like renting a house together; taking trips together; buying a car together; only thing you didn't do is get married then but married now...so if a person does not believe in marriage but does everything a married couple does and they live together for 14 years, this moron would think never mind you lived for 14 years but you are not married yet...if a person wants to cheat he/she can do it perfectly without raising any suspicions...morons...i am baffled you are married now so however you lived before the marriage how is it relevant to the case?

In starting he said that he don;t want people like me in Canada....

I said OK... but I still don't why he said... I don;t even have a criminal record.