Hi,
I have previously posted on here but now have an update. In short, I am applying for the IEC work visa for Canada. In 2012 I received two infractions for disturbing the peace; public intoxication, in California. When I was arrested I was initially given two misdemenours, I went to court, paid a fine and plead no contest to two infractions for disturbing the peace; public intox. Upon getting this the attorney advised me it was akin to a parking ticket and going forward it would not effect my future; and to answer no to any questions re: criminal offences.
I did this for my eTA , re the following question: Have you ever committed, been arrested for, been charged with or convicted of any criminal offence in any country/ territory? .... i said No ! since infractions are public offences and not criminal. Now I am tripping myself up over the semantics because I initially was infact arrested?? My FBI background report came back showing the two arrests and now I feel like I am looking MISREPRESENTATION in the face. Whilst I understand public intoxication would never have made me inadmissible and that it wouldn't of posed an issue, I am scared I'll now be banned. I have read online that 'misunderstanding' such questions isn't valid for innocent misrepresentation.
Do I need a lawyer or shall I just give up on this all together?
thanks
I have previously posted on here but now have an update. In short, I am applying for the IEC work visa for Canada. In 2012 I received two infractions for disturbing the peace; public intoxication, in California. When I was arrested I was initially given two misdemenours, I went to court, paid a fine and plead no contest to two infractions for disturbing the peace; public intox. Upon getting this the attorney advised me it was akin to a parking ticket and going forward it would not effect my future; and to answer no to any questions re: criminal offences.
I did this for my eTA , re the following question: Have you ever committed, been arrested for, been charged with or convicted of any criminal offence in any country/ territory? .... i said No ! since infractions are public offences and not criminal. Now I am tripping myself up over the semantics because I initially was infact arrested?? My FBI background report came back showing the two arrests and now I feel like I am looking MISREPRESENTATION in the face. Whilst I understand public intoxication would never have made me inadmissible and that it wouldn't of posed an issue, I am scared I'll now be banned. I have read online that 'misunderstanding' such questions isn't valid for innocent misrepresentation.
Do I need a lawyer or shall I just give up on this all together?
thanks