Canadian12 said:
Thanks for your reply. Actually everything is so good about him that I don't wanna lose him
. He has been living here for 3 years, making good money and we have checked his references. The only thing as I said is his temporary status in Canada. I have seen people ditching others just for PR. I am not saying he would ditch me for sure, he may be sincere with me but I am just looking for security so that I could feel satisfied with my decision.
would I be responsible to support him financially even if he is here and earning good money? I thought it's only for those who sponsor somebody from other country?
Being responsible for him financially means only that if he goes on welfare, or makes any other "withdrawal" from government social programs, you would have to pay that money back to the government. It doesn't mean that you must support his Ferrari habit.
Baloo said he would not marry someone about whom he was not 100% sure. I am less idealistic: there is no way one can be 100% certain about another, or else divorce rates would not be so high. Almost everyone starts a relationship with high hopes, hopes that they think are well founded at the beginning. More than 60% are wrong in the end, and divorce.
Unless two people are equally matched in every way in a beginning relationship (which is almost impossible), inevitably one partner stands to benefit more than the other from the union. Does that mean that the beneficiary is out for profit and not for love? It does not.
But how to know with as much certainty as possible? Put him to a test. One option: Ask him if he would be willing to spend the first five years in his country, instead of Canada. If he is simply hunting for a visa, he will refuse.
Of course, he has a job in Canada and so moving to his country for five years might not be practical. So ask him to put up a bond equal to your potential financial liability for the three years following receipt of permanent residence. That at least protects you if you should separate.
Does this sound suspicious and unromantic? You bet, and that's why so few marriages have prenuptial agreements -- to the dismay of the 60% that end in divorce. But perhaps there are women's groups that could suggest a more subtle way to get this done. Subtlety is not one of my strong points.