swestenzweig said:
Sorry for the thread hijack, but I am in a very similar situation. I am an IT professional working remotely in the US for a US company. Although I am married to a Canadian citizen and I am about to submit my application for PR, I was under the impression that I was not permitted to work remotely while in Canada as a visitor. I thought a work permit was still required in this instance. Can you clarify?
The response by
Rob_TO is technically correct, although there is more to the analysis than whether the activity is taking away or competing against any work from the Canadian labour market.
But don't try explaining that to a CBSA officer at a POE. They tend to see work as work and that means prohibited.
In any event, there are many nuances to this. And there can be a big difference depending on whether anyone cares, who cares. Factors can include whether the work is being done as an employee or on contract, what is the person working's primary place for doing the work.
There are, after all, many Canadian businesses providing IT products and services for the U.S. market, so just because the company itself is located in the U.S. does not mean the activity is not competing with the Canadian labour market.
This exception, by the way, is mostly to protect travelers who are doing work for their foreign employer while they are traveling. Otherwise, for example, just answering work related email while on a holiday in Canada could get a person banned from Canada. It is not intended to allow an American to set up a home office in Toronto to do contract work for a U.S. company.
In practice this is very, very flexible and lenient,
so long as CBSA is not the one asking questions. (That said, must admit I saw one show of
Border Security in which the examining officer did clearly understand the difference between prohibited work versus helping a friend do some household repairs, typically done by the homeowner (rather than by a hired professional), for no pay . . . but my impression is that the officers seen on that program are better informed than many of the ones usually encountered at the border.)