+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Help, how to stop my wife to come back

rhcohen2014

VIP Member
Apr 6, 2014
4,935
185
Category........
Visa Office......
Ottawa
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
March 17, 2014
Doc's Request.
April 11, 2014
AOR Received.
May 8, 2014
File Transfer...
May 9, 2014
Med's Request
upfront
Med's Done....
Nov 15, 2013
Interview........
waived
Passport Req..
July 15, 2014
VISA ISSUED...
July 25, 2014/ received August 1, 2014
LANDED..........
August 29, 2014
Edgehead78 said:
Looks like Harmin knows more about the case than we do. Can he/she be the other party?
not likely if you read his other posts.

quite honestly, i'd suggest people stop trying to prove Harmin wrong as it seems to be inciting his need to argue his misguided points even more. We all know the truth about the laws, the OP is the only one to know the truth about his situation, and the best we can do is continue to answer the OPs questions as they come, not keep trying to prove Harmin wrong. Harmin is obviously enjoying trying to prove himself right, and it's clogging up this forum from legitimate needs.
 

truesmile

Champion Member
Jun 7, 2012
2,622
94
Category........
Visa Office......
MNL
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
25-05-2012
AOR Received.
18-07-2012
File Transfer...
24-07-2012
Med's Done....
18-05-2012
Interview........
WAIVED
Passport Req..
05-12-2012
VISA ISSUED...
08-01-2013
LANDED..........
02-02-2013
Now that the dust has settled, I'd just like to throw out there, that even the posts from the forum members very knowledgeable and well-versed on Condition 51 have used operative words or phrases such as "could be revoked", "can be revoked", "might be revoked", and so on. What nobody has stated, and what the OP in this case wants that phrase to be is "WILL be revoked". As I stated earlier on, that's NOT his call, that's up to CIC, and I doubt the CBSA are going to make that unilateral call either. Likely they haven't even broken out into groups yet to discuss how to deal with this relatively "new" issue. We'll see if they have the time to track all those 51'ers down.
 

Rob_TO

VIP Member
Nov 7, 2012
11,427
1,551
Toronto
Category........
FAM
Visa Office......
Seoul, Korea
App. Filed.......
13-07-2012
AOR Received.
18-08-2012
File Transfer...
21-08-2012
Med's Done....
Sent with App
Passport Req..
N/R - Exempt
VISA ISSUED...
30-10-2012
LANDED..........
16-11-2012
HARMIN said:
u Sure OP is very good man and in His marriage failure not OP fault , all his wife fault ??that's only i wanna say in my first post
It doesn't matter who was at fault or what the reason was they separated. Condition 51 does not care if it was the sponsor or applicant that initiated the separation, and they don't care what the reasons were. CIC ONLY cares if there was any abuse of the sponsor towards applicant.

If no abuse involved, then condition 51 simply states if the couple separates before 2 years, PR will most likely be revoked. She will not be banned from entering Canada, but she will have a hearing once in Canada where CIC can then revoke it.

If OP doesn't want his wife to come back to Canada, he should inform her that she has been reported for violating condition 51 rule and that he has notified CIC of the breakdown in relationship and non-cohabitation. He should make sure she is aware that if she returns to Canada, she will face a hearing with CIC and will most likely have her PR revoked after which she would need to return home. So she would really just be wasting the cost of an airplane ticket, so she may decide on her own not to even bother.