May
May I also ask you when, when you moved from Quebec and if you informed MIFI about it ?
H&C Humanitarian Ground with/or Without Failed refugee claim
- Thread starter TheWaitingGamer
- Start date
My friend received AIP in June 2025. Got CSQ already (I believe in couple of months). She got lucky in CSQ. However her AIP took long (more than 4.5 years)
Last edited:
I moved out of Quebec in Sep 2025. Didn't inform MIFI. However while sending the additional documents after AIP, I informed IRCC, not to send my application to QC as I will be moving out. After I came to BC, I did send a web form and got my province changed.
Was he an asylum seeker, or did he have a pending PRRA or security issues that could explain such a delay ?
The system is incredibly backlogged, there was a large volume of H&C applications and Quebec reduced immigration volume before the rest of Canada. As I have mentioned before the H&C system is no longer functional which is why there has to be some major reforms.
Yes, I’m well aware of that it’s actually quite hard to miss, even legal experts are talking about it and already discussing different ways to resolve the issue.
I also noticed your tweets addressed to the Minister of Immigration, IRCC, and that whole group, asking them to delete and cancel applications… I’m sure that’s incredibly helpful !
And rest assured, your messages have most certainly been read with the utmost attention by MPs and the various bureaucrats at IRCC and the Department of Public security etc...probably in between two important decisions, just before solving everything thanks to you !
Me and my occasional tweet over the years have sometimes focused on H&C. Calling for a full and stretch from scratch is not an uncommon opinion since most consultant & immigration lawyers. Also have issues with supervisa visit length given pressure it puts on healthcare and misleads people many who have no intention of ever returning full-time. Also PGP when we can’t secure healthcare for current population of seniors. I have also commented on lax approvals of TRVs for a few years even while asylum cases rocketed and people slept on the sleep. Assume you’ve looked back on all my posts and replies and you’ll find some basic problem solving. Most tweets are a criticism of the bureaucrats and MPs and the incompetence of the system.
Just a a quick reminder that doxxing can be a criminal offence
As someone with some knowledge in law, I can tell you that doxxing involves the disclosure of personal information online, along with harassment and threats these are the basic elements of the offense you are referring to....
As for my actions, I simply read what you publicly post on Twitter, where you are very active and frequently comment on immigration-related pages. You even use examples from our posts on this forum to discuss immigration issues. Despite the fact that your account, name, and photo are public, I would never share that information with others, as I understand that even if an account is public it may still go against your wishes to have it shared in this forum !
I am not engaging in doxxing, but what you have just done constitutes a form of public wrongdoing against me, which is clearly completely unfounded. Not to mention that you have shared a significant amount of false information about immigration law, even though you are not supposed to provide legal advice. This raises serious ethical concerns and contributes to the spread of misinformation.
I would also like to point out that, although you seem generally interested in immigration, your focus appears to be on humanitarian and compassionate considerations, which represent only a very small portion of the applications received each year. I fail to see how this directly impacts you.
I have often wondered why you pay such particular attention to these types of applications, which are frequently used by very vulnerable individuals. Over the years, I have tried to explain to you that, while some people may abuse the system, there remains a significant number of honest applicants. Unfortunately, you continue to harass us repeatedly...
I would also like to emphasize that while freedom of expression is protected under the Charter, it is not absolute. Article 1 of the Charter specifies that it may be limited in certain cases, particularly when it causes harm to others. Unfortunately, your actions are causing harm based on concerns that dont appear to be well-founded.
I understand that one can care deeply about this country and want to protect it from being exploited and in that, you are right ! However, it is important not to generalize or oversimplify issues that are, in reality highly complex...
This phrase must be bloody ridiculous! Actually just by been active in this forum itself, and threatening people by telling them “ doxxing “ a criminal despite your silly comments and posts
That’s interesting cause I wondered how ircc increased the processing times to 10+ years after Canuck78 made the prediction. Seems like they do listen to our opinions
It is truly unfortunate that applicants for humanitarian considerations are seen as a bunch of fraudsters who only seek to take advantage of this country, bypass the law, and exploit the system!
Yes, a significant portion of immigrants, not just those applying on humanitarian grounds, but across all categories, do not view this country as their own, but rather as a source of income or perhaps prestige, etc. However, that is not the case for all of us!
Humanitarian applications represent only a very small portion of the requests submitted to IRCC. These include people who are not eligible for asylum or PRRA, but who genuinely suffer in their home countries, victims of crime, war, corruption, threats, very hard life conditions and more.... These are people whose children are seriously ill , or applicants themselves who are sick, people who have built a life here, who pay astronomical amounts for housing, for education, who struggle to work and to access healthcare, etc. These are people who pay taxes, who are serious, who speak French and English, and so on.
This is the thousandth time I’ve said this here, and I will repeat it again , just because we are applying for permanent residence does not mean we are losers, lazy, or opportunistic. And I would like to point out that Canada is not the only country in the world that offers permanent residence on humanitarian grounds, it is not an exception, unless we compare it to Uncle Sam, or rather Uncle Trump, just below us, who does not care about people. In Europe, several countries recognize humanitarian considerations as a basis for regularization.
It is time to put an end to this stigmatization and these populist narratives!
Yes, a significant portion of immigrants, not just those applying on humanitarian grounds, but across all categories, do not view this country as their own, but rather as a source of income or perhaps prestige, etc. However, that is not the case for all of us!
Humanitarian applications represent only a very small portion of the requests submitted to IRCC. These include people who are not eligible for asylum or PRRA, but who genuinely suffer in their home countries, victims of crime, war, corruption, threats, very hard life conditions and more.... These are people whose children are seriously ill , or applicants themselves who are sick, people who have built a life here, who pay astronomical amounts for housing, for education, who struggle to work and to access healthcare, etc. These are people who pay taxes, who are serious, who speak French and English, and so on.
This is the thousandth time I’ve said this here, and I will repeat it again , just because we are applying for permanent residence does not mean we are losers, lazy, or opportunistic. And I would like to point out that Canada is not the only country in the world that offers permanent residence on humanitarian grounds, it is not an exception, unless we compare it to Uncle Sam, or rather Uncle Trump, just below us, who does not care about people. In Europe, several countries recognize humanitarian considerations as a basis for regularization.
It is time to put an end to this stigmatization and these populist narratives!
Each person reflects, in one way or another, their personal experiences, their way of seeing things, their values, their fears, etc. A white Canadian born in Canada to parents who are also Canadianlike this Québécois, for example ( probably who truly wants an intercultural Quebec society not like PQ ou CAQ etc.. and who mayne want to the French language, French-Canadian culture, etc.,) without falling into nationalism, and therefore has a different perspective from a nationalist and chauvinistic Québécois who, for instance, believes that Quebec and its culture are under threat and that immigration should be restricted.
A Canadian from a recent immigrant background may have more compassion for you because they have also struggled with this flawed system and understand the stress associated with it. On the other hand, someone else who wants to elevate themselves and perhaps seek exclusivity might hope to see you fail, to suffer as much as possible, because they suffered too so in their view, you should have to go through the same.
A Canadian from a recent immigrant background may have more compassion for you because they have also struggled with this flawed system and understand the stress associated with it. On the other hand, someone else who wants to elevate themselves and perhaps seek exclusivity might hope to see you fail, to suffer as much as possible, because they suffered too so in their view, you should have to go through the same.
Similar threads
