He /she doesn’t have Application numberYou dont even need to give your UCI. Just your application number and DOB.
He /she doesn’t have Application numberYou dont even need to give your UCI. Just your application number and DOB.
ThanksYes , get from work permit, UCI will stay same for all applications with iRCc.
ThanksYou dont even need to give your UCI. Just your application number and DOB.
Parliament does not work during summer, last day of work was June 20, it will re-open on September 15, 2025.This bill has privacy issues that would impact Canadians, I do not think it will pass in its current form. It has not progressed since June 18, 2025.
Then you cant use the phone system… You need to get your AOR firstHe /she doesn’t have Application number
Well, I am also reading Federal court decisions, and I did not find evidence for what you stated. Majority of JR cases involving H and C applications where there is hardship and the best interest of children were granted. The question here is do you think Canada will deport more than 70,000 people with pending H and C, many of whom have Canadian children. The answer is obviously no.
That is another issue that H&C doesn’t give you implied status but the problem is that removing these people while application is processed can be seen as contributing to the hardship that they are claiming will be caused if they are removed. Also, criteria to apply for this is that you must be in Canada and hence officers a lot of the time are obligated to grant status.
Again this is whole another issue they need to deal with. I think applicants that apply again with same info should be eliminated and sent back immediately and their applications should definitely not be prioritized over someone who may genuinely need it and applied for the first time. This is just talks honestly and I can imagine this is not something that can be implemented so easily. IRCC need to factor in consequences of these measures because while it may get rid of bad apples; it may also affect a lot of people who genuinely needs it.
I am sure forums like this should encourage it too when someone comes for advice just because their parents are here from last 2yrs on super-visa and now they feel entitled to apply for H&C coz they don't wanna go back like seriously? It is never a win for people who genuinely try to follow law by the book.
Only person who benefits from all this BS is lawyers and consultants. Making big bucks.
Hello Everyone, I already passed my eligibility, Medical & Security except criminality in process of my PR application under H & C program. Currently waiting for FD since June 2024.
Can I apply BOWP for me and my spouse & study permit for my kids within Canada ?? Is H & C category eligible for BOWP ??because my family status ( adult work permit/ kids study permit) expiring on OCt 15,2025 . Currently I have closed work permit , spouse have open work permits & kids have study. Please advise if someone have information about this category.
Thank you very much!!
A quote from the federal court decision from literally last week to uphold deportation of someone with 2 Canadian children:Well, I am also reading Federal court decisions, and I did not find evidence for what you stated. Majority of JR cases involving H and C applications where there is hardship and the best interest of children were granted. The question here is do you think Canada will deport more than 70,000 people with pending H and C, many of whom have Canadian children. The answer is obviously no.
The case you are talking about has identity and misrepresentation issues. This can not be generalized to all other cases. Here is recent JR for H and C.A quote from the federal court decision from literally last week to uphold deportation of someone with 2 Canadian children:
“I am not satisfied that he has presented clear, convincing evidence that irreparable harm will be caused to his two Canadian-born children upon his removal. Also, however unfortunate and painful family separation may be, the jurisprudence of this Court and the Federal Court of Appeal is clear that those who are in Canada illegally cannot avoid the execution of a valid removal order simply because they are the parents of Canadian-born children (Crawford v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 743 at para 28).; (Baron v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2009 FCA 81 [Baron] at para 57; Kukoyi v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 CanLII 270 at para 23);”
Plus a court decision from today to uphold refusal in H&C for an applicant with these basis of application:
“ To support the application, Ms. Isaac relied on her establishment in Canada, her relationship with her brother who lives in Canada, the best interests of her children, and the hardships she would face if returned to Nigeria.”
I read court cases every day and see several decisions like these a several times a week lately.
The case you are talking about has identity and misrepresentation issues. This can not be generalized to all other cases. Here is recent JR for H and C.
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/528683/index.do
To sum up, JR are granted for hardship and BIOC under H and C.
I was quoting two different decisions, not one case, and it is just from the last couple of days, but there are more published if you look through each.The case you are talking about has identity and misrepresentation issues. This can not be generalized to all other cases. Here is recent JR for H and C.
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/528683/index.do
To sum up, JR are granted for hardship and BIOC under H and C.