+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
This bill has privacy issues that would impact Canadians, I do not think it will pass in its current form. It has not progressed since June 18, 2025.
Parliament does not work during summer, last day of work was June 20, it will re-open on September 15, 2025.

Overall, parliament works only 73 days in a year.

Also, the bill does give IRCC full powers to cancel applications retroactively even after AOR, even already issued PR cards. They claim they want these powers back to be able to cancel a chuck of applications to in streams with bigger backlogs.
 
Last edited:
Well, I am also reading Federal court decisions, and I did not find evidence for what you stated. Majority of JR cases involving H and C applications where there is hardship and the best interest of children were granted. The question here is do you think Canada will deport more than 70,000 people with pending H and C, many of whom have Canadian children. The answer is obviously no.

Would disagree we are seeing adults even with Canadian children being removed. They may get an extension to finish the school year. There often has to be a special reason for the child to remain in Canada for example if they have a chronic medical condition where care would not be available in their parent’s home country. Time spent in Canada can have an impact as well. I moved and changed schools as a child and even changed language of instruction multiple times. Families do move and children in general are pretty adaptable. Canada doesn’t want to incentivize having Canadian children to guarantee the ability to secure PR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stallion1982
That is another issue that H&C doesn’t give you implied status but the problem is that removing these people while application is processed can be seen as contributing to the hardship that they are claiming will be caused if they are removed. Also, criteria to apply for this is that you must be in Canada and hence officers a lot of the time are obligated to grant status.

Again this is whole another issue they need to deal with. I think applicants that apply again with same info should be eliminated and sent back immediately and their applications should definitely not be prioritized over someone who may genuinely need it and applied for the first time. This is just talks honestly and I can imagine this is not something that can be implemented so easily. IRCC need to factor in consequences of these measures because while it may get rid of bad apples; it may also affect a lot of people who genuinely needs it.

I am sure forums like this should encourage it too when someone comes for advice just because their parents are here from last 2yrs on super-visa and now they feel entitled to apply for H&C coz they don't wanna go back like seriously? It is never a win for people who genuinely try to follow law by the book.

Only person who benefits from all this BS is lawyers and consultants. Making big bucks.

You have to be in Canada to apply for H&C not for it to be processed. Even if removed your H&C will be processed. There are certainly some cases that may be able to remain in Canada while H&C is processed especially when they are well into processing but if there was fear of persecution people should she’s claimed asylum or filed PPRA. Removal of pending H&C claimants have often exhausted those avenues so hardship is not deemed enough to prevent removal. As someone who does monitor JRs, there has been a huge uptick in removals. In the past having filed an H&C would have likely kept someone from the active removal list but that has changed. Many were required to do nothing while out of status and some may have had to check in with CBSA but removals were easily put on hold that point.
 
Hello Everyone, I already passed my eligibility, Medical & Security except criminality in process of my PR application under H & C program. Currently waiting for FD since June 2024.


Can I apply BOWP for me and my spouse & study permit for my kids within Canada ?? Is H & C category eligible for BOWP ??because my family status ( adult work permit/ kids study permit) expiring on OCt 15,2025 . Currently I have closed work permit , spouse have open work permits & kids have study. Please advise if someone have information about this category.


Thank you very much!!

Once you have AIP you can apply for WPs and SPs (assume extensions would be possible) not BOWPs.
 
Well, I am also reading Federal court decisions, and I did not find evidence for what you stated. Majority of JR cases involving H and C applications where there is hardship and the best interest of children were granted. The question here is do you think Canada will deport more than 70,000 people with pending H and C, many of whom have Canadian children. The answer is obviously no.
A quote from the federal court decision from literally last week to uphold deportation of someone with 2 Canadian children:

“I am not satisfied that he has presented clear, convincing evidence that irreparable harm will be caused to his two Canadian-born children upon his removal. Also, however unfortunate and painful family separation may be, the jurisprudence of this Court and the Federal Court of Appeal is clear that those who are in Canada illegally cannot avoid the execution of a valid removal order simply because they are the parents of Canadian-born children (Crawford v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 743 at para 28).; (Baron v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2009 FCA 81 [Baron] at para 57; Kukoyi v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 CanLII 270 at para 23);”

Plus a court decision from today to uphold refusal in H&C for an applicant with these basis of application:
“ To support the application, Ms. Isaac relied on her establishment in Canada, her relationship with her brother who lives in Canada, the best interests of her children, and the hardships she would face if returned to Nigeria.”

I read court cases every day and see several decisions like these a several times a week lately.
 
A quote from the federal court decision from literally last week to uphold deportation of someone with 2 Canadian children:

“I am not satisfied that he has presented clear, convincing evidence that irreparable harm will be caused to his two Canadian-born children upon his removal. Also, however unfortunate and painful family separation may be, the jurisprudence of this Court and the Federal Court of Appeal is clear that those who are in Canada illegally cannot avoid the execution of a valid removal order simply because they are the parents of Canadian-born children (Crawford v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 743 at para 28).; (Baron v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2009 FCA 81 [Baron] at para 57; Kukoyi v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 CanLII 270 at para 23);”

Plus a court decision from today to uphold refusal in H&C for an applicant with these basis of application:
“ To support the application, Ms. Isaac relied on her establishment in Canada, her relationship with her brother who lives in Canada, the best interests of her children, and the hardships she would face if returned to Nigeria.”

I read court cases every day and see several decisions like these a several times a week lately.
The case you are talking about has identity and misrepresentation issues. This can not be generalized to all other cases. Here is recent JR for H and C.
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/528683/index.do
To sum up, JR are granted for hardship and BIOC under H and C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WellWell2021
The case you are talking about has identity and misrepresentation issues. This can not be generalized to all other cases. Here is recent JR for H and C.
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/528683/index.do
To sum up, JR are granted for hardship and BIOC under H and C.

Not quite. Many of the issues in this JR were the result of a very poorly written H&C refusal as was pointed out many times so also not a great example. This case could easily be refused a second time.
 
Last edited:
It’s been such a long, difficult and exhausting journey for our family but my husband has finally received the good news. He has received his COPR!! Just 1 more final step to finalize his PR to get his card.

He had completed his medical end of May and we just received the good news today!!!!