I am a Canadian PR and I’m seeking advice regarding my girlfriend’s visitor visa application from Mongolia, which has now been refused twice. I want to understand if a reconsideration request is advisable or if we should wait for GCMS notes and build a stronger new application.
Financial Support: Provided by both myself and her family (joint support).
Issues mentioned by IRCC:
First Application (Refused)
Purpose: 3-month visit after her graduation, as a celebration trip to travel across Canada with me.Financial Support: Provided by both myself and her family (joint support).
Issues mentioned by IRCC:
- Intended stay was considered too long for a tourist.
- Financial support came from multiple sources.
- Inconsistency in employment letters – she interned between two affiliated family businesses, but we failed to clarify that, and both letters were submitted without explanation that it was a family-owned company and that her brother approved her leave.
Second Application (Refused)
We addressed all previous concerns:- Reduced trip to 3 weeks over Christmas.
- She stated she would self-fund the trip (shorter stay, enough personal funds).
- Provided complete employment documentation with proper explanations.
- She had signed a 6-month commercial merchandise contract in Mongolia after the first application decision, which legally requires her presence in Mongolia, so we thought this demonstrated strong home ties.
- Her family sent travel funds to her bank account, and she included these funds in her proof of financial capacity.
"I note that the applicant submitted a recent contract at the end of August 2025, stating future income potential of 1500 CAD per month. I note that the applicant has demonstrated modest funds and a recent lump sum deposit of no provenance received prior to the application submission."
My Concerns
- It seems the officer may have assumed this new commercial contract was her only source of income, possibly overlooking her stable full-time employment.
- The recent deposit from her family (which we clearly stated was for travel purposes) may have been seen as unexplained or suspicious, even though we disclosed the source.
Additional Context
- I (the inviter) am a PR in Canada with stable employment as a software engineer.
- A proper invitation letter was submitted.
- All details about ties, employment, and purpose of travel were explained clearly in the second application.
Questions for the Community
- Is it worth submitting a reconsideration request based on the possibility that the officer misunderstood or overlooked her full-time employment and the source of funds?
- Should we wait for GCMS notes before deciding next steps, or is it clear a third application would still be risky?
- Would it be more effective to strengthen her financial profile independently and apply after several months, or does her being my girlfriend create a standing presumption of immigrant intent regardless?
- Has anyone had success arguing family-gifted travel funds as legitimate in TRV applications, and how should it be presented?