+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
Client Portal

Federal Skilled Worker Class Action Lawsuit

This is the latest entry that could be found in IMM-7502-11 (MOHAMMAD MEHDI EMAM).

Letter from Tim Leahy, counsel for the applicant dated 14-NOV-2012 now that I know the purpose of the CMC, I have concluded that it would be impolitique for me to be present, thus I don not expect to attend. received on 14-NOV-2012
 
This is the latest entry that could be found in IMM-8669-12 (HABIBOLLAH ABEDI).

Letter from THE APPLICANT dated 13-NOV-2012 REQUESTING THAT THE FOLLOWING FILES BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE CASE MANAGEMENT/ CLASS PROCEEDING: IMM-11528-12, IMM-11526-12, IMM-11525-12, IMM-11527-12 received on 13-NOV-2012
 
Strangely there is no update about the 14th conference,,,,,does anyone know what happened yesterday in the court?
 
If Justice Bernes favours motion, then following are probable possibilities:


1 Cases filed before 14th june may be settled in six months.

2 cases filed after 14th june may be settled in one year time.

3 The judgement all depend upon the attitude of Laywers & Judge.

Let us wait and watch
 
This is the latest entry that could be found in IMM-7502-11 (MOHAMMAD MEHDI EMAM).

Letter from Applicant dated 13-NOV-2012 Requesting the following applications be added to case management: IMM-11541-12; 11542-12; 11543-12; 11546-12; 11545-12; 11544-12; 11570-12; 11569-12; 11568-12 11567-12 received on 15-NOV-2012

Meaning, a number of new cases have been filed by the counsel Tim Leahy and a request has been made to the court to join those to the lead file of MOHAMMAD MEHDI EMAM.
 
This is the latest entry that could be found in IMM-5635-12 (MAE JOY TABINGO).

Letter from Applicant dated 13-NOV-2012 requesting that the listed applicants (applications) be joined to this lead file and brought under case management. received on 13-NOV-2012

Meaning, a number of new cases have been filed by the counsel Mario Bellissimo and a request has been made to the court to join those to the lead file of MAE JOY TABINGO.
 
which is why they indicated 12 Nov as the last day of joining the litigation so the new files can be included in the 14 Nov case mgt conference..

cheers


warmest said:
This is the latest entry that could be found in IMM-5635-12 (MAE JOY TABINGO).

Letter from Applicant dated 13-NOV-2012 requesting that the listed applicants (applications) be joined to this lead file and brought under case management. received on 13-NOV-2012

Meaning, a number of new cases have been filed by the counsel Mario Bellissimo and a request has been made to the court to join those to the lead file of MAE JOY TABINGO.
Click to expand...
 
kiwi1 said:
which is why they indicated 12 Nov as the last day of joining the litigation so the new files can be included in the 14 Nov case mgt conference..

cheers
Click to expand...

I still found application were filed on 15 Nov. so means after deadline ? In my opinion the last day may be 23 Nov. or 30 Nov.
 
Still waiting for what happen on 14 Nov. any one has any news about it. Please do share. Our lawyers usually do not update us or their website regularly. :(
 
what I understand from 14 CMC points to discuess were as follows:

1. Schedule time line for Perfecting Application for leave.

According to IRPR Section 10 read as below

PERFECTING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE

10. (1) The applicant shall perfect an application for leave by complying with subrule (2)

(a) where the application sets out that the applicant has received the tribunal’s written reasons, within 30 days after filing the application; or


(b) where the application sets out that the applicant has not received the tribunal’s written reasons, within 30 days after receiving either the written reasons, or the notice under paragraph 9(2)(b), as the case may be.



(2) The applicant shall serve on every respondent who has filed and served a notice of appearance, a record containing the following, on consecutively numbered pages, and in the following order

(a) the application for leave,


(b) the decision or order, if any, in respect of which the application is made,


(c) the written reasons given by the tribunal, or the notice under paragraph 9(2)(b), as the case may be,


(d) one or more supporting affidavits verifying the facts relied on by the applicant in support of the application, and


(e) a memorandum of argument which shall set out concise written submissions of the facts and law relied upon by the applicant for the relief proposed should leave be granted,


and file it, together with proof of service.

So nothing very important expect the possible dates we may see in this CMC. Well this is my understanding till now on point No. 1
 
FSW: PRE-C50 BACKLOG (APPL. REC'D BEFORE FEBRUARY 27, 2008) AS ON JULY 06, 2012

VISA OFFICE SELECTION DECISION FINAL DECISION TOTAL
ALL OFFICES 96,972 4,566 101,538

ALL OVERSEAS OFFICES 96,954 4,469 101,423

AFRICA--MIDDLE EAST 17,196 246 17,442
Abu Dhabi 0 0 0
Accra - RPC 4,680 23 4,703
Amman 0 0 0
Beirut 1 0 1
Cairo 2,164 16 2,180
Dakar 2 30 32
Damascus 6,438 0 6,438
Nairobi 1,975 73 2,048
Pretoria 910 21 931
Rabat 329 81 410
Tel Aviv 697 2 699

ASIA--PACIFIC 62,019 1,357 63,376
Beijing 388 654 1,042
Colombo 140 50 190
Hong Kong 8,343 396 8,739
Islamabad 30 36 66
Kuala Lumpur 0 0 0
Manila 13,693 87 13,780
New Delhi 33,739 41 33,780
Seoul 610 19 629
Singapore - RPC 4,315 66 4,381
Sydney 507 6 513
Taipei 254 2 256
Tokyo 0 0 0

EUROPE 15,510 2,644 18,154
Ankara 16 31 47
Berlin 0 6 6
Bucharest 0 0 0
Kiev 0 4 4
London - RPC 14,565 1,433 15,998
Moscow 3 23 26
Paris - RPC 6 139 145
Rome 1 0 1
Vienna - RPC 147 190 337
Warsaw 772 818 1,590

AMERICAS 2,229 222 2,451
Bogota 794 61 855
Buenos Aires 0 0 0
Buffalo - RPC 4 46 50
Buffalo 1 28 29
Detroit 0 3 3
Los Angeles 0 6 6
New York 3 1 4
Seattle 0 8 8
Caracas 37 29 66
Guatemala 0 0 0
Havana 1 1 2
Kingston 532 28 560
Lima 0 0 0
Mexico 387 8 395
Port of Spain 472 39 511
Port-au-Prince 2 1 3
Santiago 0 0 0
Santo Domingo 0 1 1
Sao Paulo 0 8 8

OFFICES IN CANADA (GCMS ONLY) 18 97 115
CPC Mississauga 0 0 0
CPP Ottawa 18 97 115
CPC Sydney 0 0 0
CPC Vegreville 0 0 0
Other Inland Offices 0 0 0
[tr][td]
 
wounderful said:
(b) the decision or order, if any, in respect of which the application is made,
(c) the written reasons given by the tribunal, or the notice under paragraph 9(2)(b), as the case may be,
Click to expand...

I know our cases are way past the initial stage, but I hope people now understand why the registry entry states "no decision has been made, therefore no reasons exist...".
 
It would have been true justice to litigants, if court had ordered to process the files of litigants immidiatly on priority basis and the matter of compensation decided later on. But shockingly court has kept the justice denied to longest waiting aspirants. I AM VERY FRUSTRATED ON THE ATTITUDE OF DOJ.
 
These are the only visa offices that have atleast 1,000 pre-C50 backlog applications with them (arranged in descending order):

Visa Office Selection decision Final decision Total
New Delhi 33,739 41 33,780
London-RPC 14,565 1,433 15,998
Manila 13,693 87 13,780
Hong Kong 8,343 396 8,739
Damascus 6,438 0 6,438
Accra-RPC 4,680 23 4,703
Singapore-RPC 4,315 66 4,381
Cairo 2,164 16 2,180
Nairobi 1,975 73 2,048
Warsaw 772 818 1,590
Beijing 388 654 1,042
 
Just-in-time immigration system imminent: lawyer

http://www.vancouversun.com/touch/story.html?id=7555567

http://o.canada.com/2012/11/15/1116-immigration-backlog/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.