Effective date of Bill C24

[MUFC]

All these clauses have just a moral value.
Nobody will get denied only because he left Canada after the application is in process.

The danger is when the applicant loses his residency which is a different issue.

 

[torontosm]

All these clauses have just a moral value.
Nobody will get denied only because he left Canada after the application is in process.

And you know this how? Do you have anything to backup your views, because the law clearly states otherwise.

 

[MUFC]

All these intention clauses do not poses anything obligatory in practice.
They are intentions.

That's why it starts with "If granted citizenship..." which doesn't mean that the citizen has to continue residing here, nevertheless that it says directly this. It is a moral.

IT is not possible somebody to get a denial based just and only on clause with intention character.

People will get rejection only on the requirements based with clear requirements, like number of days short before the submission.

There is no case in the western world where somebody gets a denial of his citizenship just based on intention clause.... these clauses have different characteristic

 

[screech339]

MUFC,

Are you planning on leaving Canada after you submit your canadian citizenship application and returning long enough to write test and oath?

Screech339

 

[MUFC]

In my case I don't really need a Canadian passport, because I already poses a passport which is giving me the same perks.

I am not keen to duplicate something I already have, that's why I don't have a fixed plan when to apply and what I am going to do after that for sure... we are living in a dynamic world and everyday there are new opportunities... that's why making fixed plans for future is a difficult task.

 

[torontosm]

All these intention clauses do not poses anything obligatory in practice.
They are intentions.
That's why it starts with "If granted citizenship..." which doesn't mean that the citizen has to continue residing here, nevertheless that it says directly this. It is a moral.
IT is not possible somebody to get a denial based just and only on clause with intention character.
People will get rejection only on the requirements based with clear requirements, like number of days short before the submission.
There is no case in the western world where somebody gets a denial of his citizenship just based on intention clause.... these clauses have different characteristic

so your opinions are based on nothing but your flawed interpretation of the language, and your blind belief that you are always right?

 

[MUFC]

Based on the fact that there is no case in the western countries world with same moral value clause, somebody to get rejection based solely and only such a clause.

Practically no direct implementation in order to reject... same case here

 

[screech339]

So Canada laws depends on other country's law on how CIC does its job? Are you saying Canada does not have a say on how citizenship are acquired.

 

[MUFC]

Moral value clause can't be a direct reason for rejection.

Canada has it's own direct impact requirements like number of days of physical residence before the application.

 

[ASTROO]

Hi.. it might sound a bit a silly question but iam trying to comprehend that whether the new rule would be applicable to the people who would apply for citizenship after july or june 2015 or who would get their PR post the mentioned dates.... thanks.. in advance...

 

[screech339]

Moral value clause can't be a direct reason for rejection.

Canada has it's own direct impact requirements like number of days of physical residence before the application.

You seems to ignore that under the new law, an additional requirement has been added along with the physical presence requirement. Not only you must past the physical presence, you must maintain residency in Canada after you submit application until oath. That is clearly spelled out which you seems to keep ignoring.

 

[screech339]

Hi.. it might sound a bit a silly question but iam trying to comprehend that whether the new rule would be applicable to the people who would apply for citizenship after july or june 2015 or who would get their PR post the mentioned dates.... thanks.. in advance...

The new rule will apply to every PR who applies, regardless of when they landed as PR in the past.

 

[MUFC]

You seems to ignore that under the new law, an additional requirement has been added along with the physical presence requirement. Not only you must past the physical presence, you must maintain residency in Canada after you submit application until oath. That is clearly spelled out which you seems to keep ignoring.

if you read my last posts from the previous page, you will see if I ignore it or not

 

[screech339]

if you read my last posts from the previous page, you will see if I ignore it or not

You seem to be the kind that despite all the evidence and words written in law and new regulations presented to you, you still think the sky is purple.

Screech339

 

[ASTROO]

The new rule will apply to every PR who applies, regardless of when they landed as PR in the past.

thanks very much for the clarification.. I guess i was having a overoptimistic thought..anyways... take care...