- May 30, 2013
- 728
- 20
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Vegreville (now sent to CPC-M)
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 14-08-2013
- Doc's Request.
- SA 06-11-2014/AIP 17-11-2014
- AOR Received.
- 26-09-2013 (didn't get email-called CIC)
- Med's Request
- Sent With
- Med's Done....
- 03-06-2013
- Interview........
- DM 02-02-2014
My husband came to Canada on a Visitor Visa. We had intended to stay only for summer holidays, but our families convinced us to stay here for the birth of our son.
On the Visitor Visa (for which he was approved and came here) on the question about criminal record we put no, since my husband was advised by the officers at the time of the incident that it would only stay on his record for 5 years. When we did the FBI check it still shows up, so we explained about his record on the PR papers.
It is not a serious criminal offence which affected anyone but him and his family. He illegally crossed the border from Canada to the USA back in 2005 so that he could see his mother who was in a bad situation. He did 3 months jail time, and was given voluntary departure – so not even actually deported.
Is the fact that there is then a discrepancy between the Visitor Visa Application and the PR Application, on the question about having a record, grounds for a refusal of PR?
There should not be any other red flags on our application besides this. I doubt the genuineness of our relationship will come into question whatsoever. If they can see we are a genuine family, with me and our son born here in Canada, do they show understanding and overlook those sort of errors? Or are they strictly by the book? Or does it just depends on the officer and their mood?!?
On the Visitor Visa (for which he was approved and came here) on the question about criminal record we put no, since my husband was advised by the officers at the time of the incident that it would only stay on his record for 5 years. When we did the FBI check it still shows up, so we explained about his record on the PR papers.
It is not a serious criminal offence which affected anyone but him and his family. He illegally crossed the border from Canada to the USA back in 2005 so that he could see his mother who was in a bad situation. He did 3 months jail time, and was given voluntary departure – so not even actually deported.
Is the fact that there is then a discrepancy between the Visitor Visa Application and the PR Application, on the question about having a record, grounds for a refusal of PR?
There should not be any other red flags on our application besides this. I doubt the genuineness of our relationship will come into question whatsoever. If they can see we are a genuine family, with me and our son born here in Canada, do they show understanding and overlook those sort of errors? Or are they strictly by the book? Or does it just depends on the officer and their mood?!?