Hello people,
I was reviewing my EE profile and I noticed that the CIC awarded me CRS points based on the 2 years worth of working experience while I should only 23.25 months qualifying working experience. Should I be worried that I am given points even though I am 0.75 month short of the 2 years working experience? (I think it's an error by the express entry system because it only asks for the starting and ending month of an experience..... so it might have gotten inflated there....)
The work experience is calculated below:
1. Non-Student Teaching Assistant - September 2012 ~ December 2012 for 100 hours (equivalent 0.75 month worth of experience)
2. Tax Associate - February 19, 2013 ~ June 30, 2013 - full time (roughly 4.5 month worth of experience)
3. Tax Associate - February 4, 2014 ~ August 15, 2014 - full time (roughly 7.5 month worth of experience)
4. Tax Associate/Senior Tax Associate - September 21, 2014 ~August 30, 2015 - full time (roughly 11.5 month worth of experience)
I also have a foreign working experience of 2 months for a summer internship qualifying for NOC 1111, I am assuming I can't use that experience to cover the 0.75 month shortfall, right?
Also, because I was in a junior/contract position, my HR is only willing to list the following as my duties for point 2 and 3:
1. Preparation of US and Canadian income tax return
2. Correspondence with US and Canadian tax authorities on client's tax return issues
3. Participation in the project to design and develop an internal technology tool for the preparation of income tax return
The NOC code I am using is 1111, do you guys think it will be challenged by the CIC since the duties above doesn't really match the 1111 description?
Because I became a permanent staff for experience 4, so my HR is willing to list all the duties I performed on my employer letter which is more in line with the 1111 description.
Considering 2, 3 and 4 are all listed on the same employer letter (they were all done with the same employer), would that help me justifying that 2 and 3 qualify for a NOC 1111 NOC code?
Lastly, my HR is listing my experience from 2, 3 and 4 as continuous, the exact wording on the employer letter is as follows:
"XXX joined the firm on February 19, 2013 and currently holds the position of Senior Associate (NOC Code 1111) in the Tax practice in our Calgary office."
I am thinking this might be misleading to the IRCC.... should I ask the HR to re-write the letter and break it down for each experience?
Thanks for the help in advance guys!
I was reviewing my EE profile and I noticed that the CIC awarded me CRS points based on the 2 years worth of working experience while I should only 23.25 months qualifying working experience. Should I be worried that I am given points even though I am 0.75 month short of the 2 years working experience? (I think it's an error by the express entry system because it only asks for the starting and ending month of an experience..... so it might have gotten inflated there....)
The work experience is calculated below:
1. Non-Student Teaching Assistant - September 2012 ~ December 2012 for 100 hours (equivalent 0.75 month worth of experience)
2. Tax Associate - February 19, 2013 ~ June 30, 2013 - full time (roughly 4.5 month worth of experience)
3. Tax Associate - February 4, 2014 ~ August 15, 2014 - full time (roughly 7.5 month worth of experience)
4. Tax Associate/Senior Tax Associate - September 21, 2014 ~August 30, 2015 - full time (roughly 11.5 month worth of experience)
I also have a foreign working experience of 2 months for a summer internship qualifying for NOC 1111, I am assuming I can't use that experience to cover the 0.75 month shortfall, right?
Also, because I was in a junior/contract position, my HR is only willing to list the following as my duties for point 2 and 3:
1. Preparation of US and Canadian income tax return
2. Correspondence with US and Canadian tax authorities on client's tax return issues
3. Participation in the project to design and develop an internal technology tool for the preparation of income tax return
The NOC code I am using is 1111, do you guys think it will be challenged by the CIC since the duties above doesn't really match the 1111 description?
Because I became a permanent staff for experience 4, so my HR is willing to list all the duties I performed on my employer letter which is more in line with the 1111 description.
Considering 2, 3 and 4 are all listed on the same employer letter (they were all done with the same employer), would that help me justifying that 2 and 3 qualify for a NOC 1111 NOC code?
Lastly, my HR is listing my experience from 2, 3 and 4 as continuous, the exact wording on the employer letter is as follows:
"XXX joined the firm on February 19, 2013 and currently holds the position of Senior Associate (NOC Code 1111) in the Tax practice in our Calgary office."
I am thinking this might be misleading to the IRCC.... should I ask the HR to re-write the letter and break it down for each experience?
Thanks for the help in advance guys!