Condition 51 missing from COPR

[ImABule]

Hello,

My wife and I collected her passport and COPR from the VFS here in Jakarta this morning. The accompanying letter from SVO stating that they are pleased to issue a PR visa etc states that if any of the information on the COPR is incorrect that the border agent at the time of landing may refuse entry to Canada. Now all of the information is correct, but under conditions it says none when my wife very clearly fits the criteria of having Condition 51 attached to her COPR as we were not married anywhere close to 2 years nor share any children in common at the time we applied. The actual condition being on my wife's COPR or not means nothing to me but my question is will this missing condition cause an issue when landing? After all it is an error in the document..

 

[canuck_in_uk]

Hi

No issue. Condition 51 is being repealed anyways.

 

[profiler]

That was part of McCallum's gifts to us on Dec 7.

 

[CDNPR2014]

The actual condition being on my wife's COPR or not means nothing to me but my question is will this missing condition cause an issue when landing? After all it is an error in the document..

no, don't sweat it. based on recent events, it's doubtful anyone's going to be seeing that condition on COPRs anymore. Enjoy the approval!

 

[ImABule]

Hi

No issue. Condition 51 is being repealed anyways.

Thank you for the reply. Yeah, I knew it was being scrapped but hadn't been when my wife's visa was issued so I was wondering if it would have any effect.

That was part of McCallum's gifts to us on Dec 7.

Yeah, but the visa was issued Nov 29, and another member I talk to regularly had his wife's visa issued on the same day and they had Condition 51 on theirs so I was a bit confused when we picked it up and saw none for conditions.

no, don't sweat it. based on recent events, it's doubtful anyone's going to be seeing that condition on COPRs anymore. Enjoy the approval!

Thank you!

 

[ski]

That's great news. I was getting worried about condition 51 too. I hope my wife gets her visa/COPR without it too.

Congrats!

 

[canuck_in_uk]

That was part of McCallum's gifts to us on Dec 7.

Not really a gift. Condition 51 served a purpose.

 

[profiler]

Not really a gift. Condition 51 served a purpose.

I guess text doesn't convey the irony.

 

[UA2014]

I have to offer congratulations to you.

 

[ImABule]

I have to offer congratulations to you.

Thank you!!!

 

[Maggie03]

That was part of McCallum's gifts to us on Dec 7.

Repealed? its still in effect no?

 

[Aquakitty]

Well they put the condition on my husband's and he shouldn't have it, so maybe IRCC likes to balance out their mistakes.

 

[Maggie03]

It heard it might take effect in Spring 2017 doesn't mean it has been repealed as of yet

 

[jr4210]

Hello,

My wife and I collected her passport and COPR from the VFS here in Jakarta this morning. The accompanying letter from SVO stating that they are pleased to issue a PR visa etc states that if any of the information on the COPR is incorrect that the border agent at the time of landing may refuse entry to Canada. Now all of the information is correct, but under conditions it says none when my wife very clearly fits the criteria of having Condition 51 attached to her COPR as we were not married anywhere close to 2 years nor share any children in common at the time we applied. The actual condition being on my wife's COPR or not means nothing to me but my question is will this missing condition cause an issue when landing? After all it is an error in the document..

I've been very inconsistent on the forums lately - last I remember you were still waiting to hear back for an approval, so I'm very happy that your wife received her PR! Congrats!

As for the Condition 51 thing, we got it, not that it matters to us at all, we live together whether it's written there or not, but yes it's still being given out.

If it's not on your wife's COPR, I wouldn't take it as an error. Them not putting it is an arguable point that it doesn't apply to your situation IMO.

 

[ImABule]

Well they put the condition on my husband's and he shouldn't have it, so maybe IRCC likes to balance out their mistakes.

LOL