+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
sgtrigger said:
Okie thanks...I'll bring it to their attention....

By the way, I was really surprised when I knew that the COPR is just that ordinary white paper, printed in black, that we received by mail today. I thought they are going to issue a study permit-like document at landing, I mean something that looks more original :)
 
sgtrigger said:
Damn....they put my wife's photo on my COPR...now I'll have to resend the COPR to them...

I would advise you to call the CIC regarding this issue, it might not be necessary to resend ur CoPR to Ottawa. I am not sure, but it might be possible to make corrections during landing. Check this link:

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/bulletins/2011/ob358.asp
 
mike5182 said:
Landing inside Canada:
call 18882422100,select 1 (language),select 1 (immigration),select 2(Permanent Resident),select 0(Urgent Number, talk to people) to make an appointment. It looks like taking longer than going directly to the boarder.

Do we need to make appointment for landing? we just got the visa and prepare for landing some day soon. I heard from other friends that we just need to
go to one border to do the landing.
 
The_Prince said:
Finally got my visa today :D I just landed with my wife 1 hour ago through the borders with US :D

Hi, for landing, do we need to make appointment? We just need to bring the landing paper with passport? right.Thanks.
 
neuron said:
Hi, for landing, do we need to make appointment? We just need to bring the landing paper with passport? right.Thanks.

Just passport, study/work permit, COPR, and u may also bring a proof of fund showing ur current balance (just in case). Good luck :)
 
Dear all, I'm reading some of the posts here about the reference letters, and I have one questions: If the RA letter says I am a "full time" PhD student, does that mean I cannot work "full time" for my RA, because one cannot study 40 hours a week and work another 40 hours a week? However, many of the successful reference letters on this forum say so. I'm confused...
 
neuron said:
Hi, for landing, do we need to make appointment? We just need to bring the landing paper with passport? right.Thanks.

Also, if you're importing a vehicle, this is the time to declare it because you avoid paying the importation taxes on the vehicle when the proper vehicle form is presented at landing.
 
The_Prince said:
I would advise you to call the CIC regarding this issue, it might not be necessary to resend ur CoPR to Ottawa. I am not sure, but it might be possible to make corrections during landing. Check this link:

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/bulletins/2011/ob358.asp

Thanks...I'll be calling them today to find out what to do...
 
Hi,
I applied for PhD steam in Feb 22, 2013. I got rejection letter on April 29, 2014. I had 18 months of work experience in my home country, described under NOC code 2121. I provide a letter of reference explaining main duties, salary etc. At the moment I received the rejection email, I sent them an email and provided a new reference letter I got from my professor here. In their reply they offered me to submit the application again however they did not guaranteed acceptance of that letter. I quote the letter of reference I initially submitted below:

[To whom it may concern,
This is written to Certify that MR. XXX XXXX has worked full time as a research technician in the XXXX lab of XXXX assisting to conduct two prominent research projects
1- Title of project 1
2- Title of project 2
His duties include writting research proposal, taking samples from the field, application of biotechnological techniques for population genetic studies. He was paid a salary of for 18 month period of contract starting from Oct 23, 2008 to May 23, 2010. In case further information required, please do not hesitate to contact XXX phone XXXX email XXXXX.]

Here is also a letter I provided on April 29th, 2014;

[Case Processing Pilot - Ottawa
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
219 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa ON K1A 1L1
7th Floor, Section B

To whom it may concern,
This reference letter is in support of XXX application for Permanent Resident status of Canada through the Skilled Worker and Professionals Class. XXXXX has been working as a research assistant at the Department of XXX. he joined us in September 2010 as a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) student.
As a student research assistant, he assists me in research activities in the area of genetics, plant pathology and genomics.

His main duties include:

• Conducting greenhouse experiment for screening resistant lines to fungal pathogens (2010-2012)
Duties: growing plants in greenhouse and inoculation of them by pathogen and scoring disease symptoms on plants.
• Genetic analysis of resistance genes (2011-2012)
His duties included characterization of resistance genes through quantitative trait loci analysis and using molecular markers.

• Understanding the molecular components of defense responses in resistance plants (2012-2014)
Duties: microscoy of plant-pathogen interaction and gene expression analysis of candidate resistance genes. Her works included growing plants, inoculation with fungal pathogen and extraction of RNA followed by analyzing the expression of defense genes using PCR and sequencing technology.

XXXX has prepared one manuscript for publication and has attended one international conference in Cordoba, Spain. He won the second student presentation in that conference.

Since he joined University of Saskatchewan, he has been receiving $21,000 for the first year, and $24,600 since after. As a research assistant, he has worked 40 hours a week in the different labs at the Department of Plant Sciences. Since September2011, XXX stipend is supplied simultaneously from my funding and a scholarship provided by XXXX
Should you have any questions, or require further information, please contact me either via XXXX

I am now getting prepared to take the case to court. Is there any chance to win the court with these letters? Your comments are really appreciated.
Cheers
 
I am so sorry to hear that!!
For your old letter:
- is a research technician position listed in the NOC 2006 or 2011?
- Was your work expereince separate from your study?
- Did you include the leading statement and job duties related to your job title in the NOC 2006 or 2011?
You can contact the MP in your area to see what he can do. He may be able to get you more details.
You can go to the federal court within a limitted period from receiving the rejection.

ES1360 said:
Hi,
I applied for PhD steam in Feb 22, 2013. I got rejection letter on April 29, 2014. I had 18 months of work experience in my home country, described under NOC code 2121. I provide a letter of reference explaining main duties, salary etc. At the moment I received the rejection email, I sent them an email and provided a new reference letter I got from my professor here. In their reply they offered me to submit the application again however they did not guaranteed acceptance of that letter. I quote the letter of reference I initially submitted below:

[To whom it may concern,
This is written to Certify that MR. XXX XXXX has worked full time as a research technician in the XXXX lab of XXXX assisting to conduct two prominent research projects
1- Title of project 1
2- Title of project 2
His duties include writting research proposal, taking samples from the field, application of biotechnological techniques for population genetic studies. He was paid a salary of for 18 month period of contract starting from Oct 23, 2008 to May 23, 2010. In case further information required, please do not hesitate to contact XXX phone XXXX email XXXXX.]

Here is also a letter I provided on April 29th, 2014;

[Case Processing Pilot - Ottawa
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
219 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa ON K1A 1L1
7th Floor, Section B

To whom it may concern,
This reference letter is in support of XXX application for Permanent Resident status of Canada through the Skilled Worker and Professionals Class. XXXXX has been working as a research assistant at the Department of XXX. he joined us in September 2010 as a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) student.
As a student research assistant, he assists me in research activities in the area of genetics, plant pathology and genomics.

His main duties include:

• Conducting greenhouse experiment for screening resistant lines to fungal pathogens (2010-2012)
Duties: growing plants in greenhouse and inoculation of them by pathogen and scoring disease symptoms on plants.
• Genetic analysis of resistance genes (2011-2012)
His duties included characterization of resistance genes through quantitative trait loci analysis and using molecular markers.

• Understanding the molecular components of defense responses in resistance plants (2012-2014)
Duties: microscoy of plant-pathogen interaction and gene expression analysis of candidate resistance genes. Her works included growing plants, inoculation with fungal pathogen and extraction of RNA followed by analyzing the expression of defense genes using PCR and sequencing technology.

XXXX has prepared one manuscript for publication and has attended one international conference in Cordoba, Spain. He won the second student presentation in that conference.

Since he joined University of Saskatchewan, he has been receiving $21,000 for the first year, and $24,600 since after. As a research assistant, he has worked 40 hours a week in the different labs at the Department of Plant Sciences. Since September2011, XXX stipend is supplied simultaneously from my funding and a scholarship provided by XXXX
Should you have any questions, or require further information, please contact me either via XXXX

I am now getting prepared to take the case to court. Is there any chance to win the court with these letters? Your comments are really appreciated.
Cheers
 
salam20 said:
I am so sorry to hear that!!
For your old letter:
- is a research technician position listed in the NOC 2006 or 2011?
- Was your work expereince separate from your study?
- Did you include the leading statement and job duties related to your job title in the NOC 2006 or 2011?
You can contact the MP in your area to see what he can do. He may be able to get you more details.
You can go to the federal court within a limitted period from receiving the rejection.

I am sorry to ask but why should we consider if our work experience is separate from our studies?
 
New applicants please notice that you should not only include the lead statement (assist professor ... in research activities...) in your RA ref. letter, but also a substantial number (almost all) of the RA main duties and these two terms: "assist professor in data analysis..." and "assist professors in the preparation of journal article or papers..." to be safe.
 
Parkinson said:
New applicants please notice that you should not only include the lead statement (assist professor ... in research activities...) in your RA ref. letter, but also a substantial number (almost all) of the RA main duties and these two terms: "assist professor in data analysis..." and "assist professors in the preparation of journal article or papers..." to be safe.

I think it would be a good idea to create a Google doc and put all of these key points there, many applicants miss them in their applications
 
Dani1982 said:
I think it would be a good idea to create a Google doc and put all of these key points there, many applicants miss them in their applications
Yes, this is a very good suggestion. I noticed that some new applicants try to prepare a ref. letter imitating the successful ref. letters without considering the key points. This is not a safe method because if you copy without understanding the regulations and because your case is very different, then a small error may lead to your rejection.