AOR in February 2016 EE Connect Here

[jaybe]

Hey guys
Can we do landing on weekends?
1st july to 4th?

You can do any days but it is not recommended during weekends because CBSA officers are very busy!

 

[canadianrrk]

Hi Manju_r,

My GCMS notes are similar, all comments in assessment 11.2 positive but 'Met' is not written and eligibility : review required.
I took it normal first but then I read at forum that if in email from ATIP they say there is something hidden under assumption 16.1 (c) then it is dangerous, means officer may have some concerns and they are doing investigation or verification. Also blank spaces means hidden words, there is no blank dashes in latest comments but on 28th May I received RPRF request , at that time another officer's comments has two dash or blank spaces. I am really worried what it could be. One positive thing they said is sometimes its only officer's name or info hidden but then why eligibility is still review required and not Met.
Mine is really simple case, I am single applicant, working with one employer from starting, part time during studies and now full time after completing my studies, My VO is NDVO and I am Ontario PNP.
If you want we can exchange emails and can share our info from gcms comments. Also someone said here that it will change to Met when file will be transferred to local VO, in last update officer added NDVO as secondary office on 7th June and assigned to someone else but file is transferred or not that I am not sure.
I send this message to Diego as well.

Where do we have 16.1(c) or blank spaces, mine is eligibility not started with A11.2 decision MET, is it fine.

 

[VaibhavN]

Where do we have 16.1(c) or blank spaces, mine is eligibility not started with A11.2 decision MET, is it fine.

In email from ATIP .

I think you are safe bro, if it clearly says MET. Could we please share A 11.2 assessment comments on email?

 

[canadianrrk]

In email from ATIP .

I think you are safe bro, if it clearly says MET. Could we please share A 11.2 assessment comments on email?

I was typing email while u posted this....lol.....sure we can share them in email.

 

[talkto_vinay]

Dear Asivad and Other Seniors,

I am PNP outland applicant and my timelines are as following,

Date Received Date Submitted
Nomination Received 14-Dec-15
ITA 18-Dec-15
AOR 4-Feb-16
Medical Passed 5-Feb-16
Schedule 4 5-Feb-16 8-Feb-16
Schedule A 11-Feb-16 18-Feb-16
Additional Document Req 11-Feb-16 21-Mar-16

I ordered GCMS notes on 5th May 2016 and received it today, It contains following details, please advise if this is not positive.

*** AGENT REVIEW *** POLICE CERTIFICATES R10 Review Request letter for Singapore police certificate sent via MyCIC. All other required police certificates on application; following PC’s NRT India for PA and SP. Criminality Decision Pending until outstanding PC from Singapore received. EDUCATION DOCUMENTS ECA report verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site. ECA Canadian Equivalence Summary reported by issuing agency as Master one year post graduate. Credential is NOT consistent with level of education claimed by PA under EE Eligibility. Credential reported to be Master one year post graduate while PA has indicated two or more secondary programs one at three years. SPOUSE’S EDUCATION NO ECA OR CANADIAN CREDENTIAL PROVIDED. AGE Applicant’s age reviewed and no change from ITA to e-APR

Also, Education status of my spouse is showing as following,
Spouse Highest Level of Education: Secon/HS Credential Incomplete

It is urgent and need your input.

Thanks in advance.

Hi
Did you try ordering another GCMS?
Did you arive at any conclusion of this ?

 

[manju_r]

Hi Manju_r,

My GCMS notes are similar, all comments in assessment 11.2 positive but 'Met' is not written and eligibility : review required.
I took it normal first but then I read at forum that if in email from ATIP they say there is something hidden under assumption 16.1 (c) then it is dangerous, means officer may have some concerns and they are doing investigation or verification. Also blank spaces means hidden words, there is no blank dashes in latest comments but on 28th May I received RPRF request , at that time another officer's comments has two dash or blank spaces. I am really worried what it could be. One positive thing they said is sometimes its only officer's name or info hidden but then why eligibility is still review required and not Met.
Mine is really simple case, I am single applicant, working with one employer from starting, part time during studies and now full time after completing my studies, My VO is NDVO and I am Ontario PNP.
If you want we can exchange emails and can share our info from gcms comments. Also someone said here that it will change to Met when file will be transferred to local VO, in last update officer added NDVO as secondary office on 7th June and assigned to someone else but file is transferred or not that I am not sure.
I send this message to Diego as well.

Hi Vaibhav, I sent you a personal message

 

[rick589]

Hi
Did you try ordering another GCMS?
Did you arive at any conclusion of this ?

Yes we received our second set of GCMS, but it has no change then privious one, hence no conclusion on this. We are planning to order one more in couple of days.

GCMS states that R.11.2 and eligibility met.

Suggestions are always welcome.

Thanks

 

[tejasmhaskar]

Hi Manju_r,

My GCMS notes are similar, all comments in assessment 11.2 positive but 'Met' is not written and eligibility : review required.
I took it normal first but then I read at forum that if in email from ATIP they say there is something hidden under assumption 16.1 (c) then it is dangerous, means officer may have some concerns and they are doing investigation or verification. Also blank spaces means hidden words, there is no blank dashes in latest comments but on 28th May I received RPRF request , at that time another officer's comments has two dash or blank spaces. I am really worried what it could be. One positive thing they said is sometimes its only officer's name or info hidden but then why eligibility is still review required and not Met.
Mine is really simple case, I am single applicant, working with one employer from starting, part time during studies and now full time after completing my studies, My VO is NDVO and I am Ontario PNP.
If you want we can exchange emails and can share our info from gcms comments. Also someone said here that it will change to Met when file will be transferred to local VO, in last update officer added NDVO as secondary office on 7th June and assigned to someone else but file is transferred or not that I am not sure.
I send this message to Diego as well.

Hi...I'm March 22 aor. Received gcms (dated 12 may) on 8 june.they indicated 16 (1) in the email. But, my r10, a11.2 and eligibility are met. Primary CPC ottawa. I am worried about that 16 (1) too

 

[IMGNSPNP]

16(1)(C)

When an information is withheld under 16(1)(c) it means there is some investigation going on, some information has been obtained which is confidential. In most cases it is the confidential information, the source of which cannot be disclosed since it is from an intelligence agency. 16(1)(c) states:

((c) information the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the enforcement of any law of Canada or a province or the conduct of lawful investigations, including, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, any such information

(i) relating to the existence or nature of a particular investigation,

(ii) that would reveal the identity of a confidential source of information, or

(iii) that was obtained or prepared in the course of an investigation; or

It is only triggered when there is some sensitive information found which cannot be disclosed. If you have no criminal history, there is no need to worry. Sometimes false alarms are raised and the law enforcement has to conduct investigation. You can't do much about it. Your application will take a little longer than usual.

Source: Legalfalcon
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/thank-you-legalfalcon-t408185.0.html

 

[VaibhavN]

16(1)(C)

When an information is withheld under 16(1)(c) it means there is some investigation going on, some information has been obtained which is confidential. In most cases it is the confidential information, the source of which cannot be disclosed since it is from an intelligence agency. 16(1)(c) states:

((c) information the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the enforcement of any law of Canada or a province or the conduct of lawful investigations, including, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, any such information

(i) relating to the existence or nature of a particular investigation,


(ii) that would reveal the identity of a confidential source of information, or

(iii) that was obtained or prepared in the course of an investigation; or

It is only triggered when there is some sensitive information found which cannot be disclosed. If you have no criminal history, there is no need to worry. Sometimes false alarms are raised and the law enforcement has to conduct investigation. You can't do much about it. Your application will take a little longer than usual.

Source: Legalfalcon
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/thank-you-legalfalcon-t408185.0.html

Thank you very much Bro, it relieved me to some extent but still worried as eligibility is review required instead of met in my case and some other such cases along with this 16 1 c

 

[VaibhavN]

Hi Vaibhav, I sent you a personal message

thanks, I replied.

 

[IMGNSPNP]

Eligibility Status: NOT STARTED / REVIEW REQUIRED

This lead officer when he/she creates this eligibility criteria which is above, he/she will quickly review PA's eligibility against
your supporting documents, if he/she finds them good then will proceed marking your STATUS on PA's Eligibility which is above. when he/she marks NOT STARTED it means she/he did not finds anything alarming but the lead officer at the LOCAL visa office needs to make sure that there is no concern. When the lead officer marks REVIEW REQUIRED or REVIEW NEEDED it is a code message to the lead officer at the LOCAL visa office signifying to him/her that you really need to check file carefully there are so many holes and might possibly lead to an interview in the future. Remember, every time you see REVIEW REQUIRED it is not sure there will be an interview, the lead officer at the visa officer could even go far by requesting more documents to make sure there is no suspicion anymore then mark RECOMMEND PASS.

I have procured the above information from another thread posted by Eagle333. This guy have had ordered 7 GCMS through his entire spouse visa process and wrote a details explanation about each and every nook & corner of the GCMS notes. I have simplified and wrote above paragraph checking his post relating to Eligibility Status: Not Started / Review Required. Check the link below for more understand regarding your GCMS.

Source: Eagle333
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/-t390292.0.html

 

[manju_r]

thanks, I replied.
[/quote

Didn't receive any in my mailbox buddy, can you recheck

 

[VaibhavN]

Eligibility Status: NOT STARTED / REVIEW REQUIRED

This lead officer when he/she creates this eligibility criteria which is above, he/she will quickly review PA's eligibility against
your supporting documents, if he/she finds them good then will proceed marking your STATUS on PA's Eligibility which is above. when he/she marks NOT STARTED it means she/he did not finds anything alarming but the lead officer at the LOCAL visa office needs to make sure that there is no concern. When the lead officer marks REVIEW REQUIRED or REVIEW NEEDED it is a code message to the lead officer at the LOCAL visa office signifying to him/her that you really need to check file carefully there are so many holes and might possibly lead to an interview in the future. Remember, every time you see REVIEW REQUIRED it is not sure there will be an interview, the lead officer at the visa officer could even go far by requesting more documents to make sure there is no suspicion anymore then mark RECOMMEND PASS.

I have procured the above information from another thread posted by Eagle333. This guy have had ordered 7 GCMS through his entire spouse visa process and wrote a details explanation about each and every nook & corner of the GCMS notes. I have simplified and wrote above paragraph checking his post relating to Eligibility Status: Not Started / Review Required. Check the link below for more understand regarding your GCMS.

Source: Eagle333
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/-t390292.0.html

Thanks again bro,
Mine is Review required in mid of the notes in officer's eligibility status update and in starting of notes where all assessments are stated it is Not started.

 

[canadianrrk]

Thanks again bro,
Mine is Review required in mid of the notes in officer's eligibility status update and in starting of notes where all assessments are stated it is Not started.

Where is it written review required.....could u tell me page number.