It didn't turn out the way Canuck wanted. He's struggling right now
I think we all want the same thing really - a magic wand that we can wave that willIt didn't turn out the way Canuck wanted. He's struggling right now
Ah, okay. For some reason I had thought even this would be a problem (as it similarly is a problem in creating a pathway for current international students and foreign workers who can't meet the bar for EE draws to stay).If it was only people already in Canada that likely wouldn’t be a big issues
Eep. You're right. So from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...pplementary-immigration-levels-2026-2028.html we have this text, emphasis mine:Assume predicted there is now outrage about the one time programs that weren’t included in the levels plan. If it was only people already in Canada that likely wouldn’t be a big issues but many have dependents outside of Canada. Government is stuck in a hard place.
Or... open enough spots to meet the current high levels coming in. But yeah, I agree the current mismatch doesn't make much sense.Place to intervene was before people arrived and to reduce levels of refugees coming from abroad which still remains high so will keep creating backlogs. The math doesn’t math.
Yeah but that's kind of a world problem. As per https://www.unhcr.org/about-unhcr/overview/figures-glance there are over 42.5 million refugees globally, so more than the entire population of Canada.It is very hard to deal with the asylum seeker, protected person refugee volume issue.
It didn't turn out the way Canuck wanted. He's struggling right now
I think we all want the same thing really - a magic wand that we can wave that will
- Ensure that genuine refugees get to stay in Canada as full PRs or citizens and their dependents get to come
- Ensure that there's enough housing and jobs for both the above folks as well as all the native-born Canadian citizens
- Ensure that funds are used wisely and efficiently in support of the above
The problem is this magic wand doesn't exist, and therefore some (potentially very painful) compromising is required.
Ah, okay. For some reason I had thought even this would be a problem (as it similarly is a problem in creating a pathway for current international students and foreign workers who can't meet the bar for EE draws to stay).
Eep. You're right. So from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...pplementary-immigration-levels-2026-2028.html we have this text, emphasis mine:
> the Government is implementing a one-time initiative over a two-year period to streamline the transition of approximately 115,000 Protected Persons in Canada who are already on a pathway to permanent residence
Basically it sounds like the one-time thing only applies to folks who are already in Canada, thus excluding any dependents still overseas. I agree that the gov't is in a hard place now - I can see this getting quite ugly real soon.
Or... open enough spots to meet the current high levels coming in. But yeah, I agree the current mismatch doesn't make much sense.
Yeah but that's kind of a world problem. As per https://www.unhcr.org/about-unhcr/overview/figures-glance there are over 42.5 million refugees globally, so more than the entire population of Canada.
I love that Canada is such a great place and so welcoming to the refugees that come here. But it should be obvious that Canada's too small to take every last one of these deserving folks in.
I am incredibly sad to agree with you on this point. But, agreed.Also doesn’t leave any room for any other major humanitarian events/wars which isn’t realistic.
But one influences the other, right? If the worldwide crisis wasn't as bad, there'd be less pressure on Canada to take in, and thus it'd be easier to ask to reduce the numbers. As it is....Yes there is a worldwide refugees crisis. Was referring to the volume of asylum seekers, refugees, protected people and their dependents in Canada or scheduled to arrive in Canada over the next 3 years.
But of course there is also pressure - from certain voting constituents within Canada as well as international pressure from the outside - to avoid lowering these. As you noted earlier, this gov't is caught in a hard place.There is no indication that IRCC is trying to do any realistic longterm planning. There current target plans will just keep creating large backlogs and the system is costing a fortune. Based on current plans IRCC would have to keep doing “one time” bulk approvals every few years because they haven’t made adjustments to reduce the number of people coming into Canada. The math still doesn’t math.
Are you still here after the new announcement? I thought you had already crossed the floor and become a Liberal. LolWould be nice if the minister actually answered questions or provided details. Also would be nice if the liberals were honest about their PR targets. Hiding another +100K PRs while saying they are reducing PR levels may blow up in their face. When the public discovers the extra 100k they will face public pressure to reduce the numbers and be accused of lying. The minister’s inability to communicate or have a concrete plan is such a liability and should have really kept Miller.
One thing I'd add to this great response:Post
Marc Miller DPLADö<ÄA>*X.com
@MarcMillerVM
Completely false. The budget proposes to give Permanent Residency to Protected Person.
That's people who have already been given protection in Canada by a tribunal and are just waiting for their permanent residency. Confusing asylum claims with protected persons is a dirty trick.
Michelle Rempel Garner # @michellere...• 1d
The Liberals allowed hundreds of thousands of backdoor economic migrants to make asylum claims after illegally crossing the border.
Instead of fixing the system they broke, the Libs are letting them jump the queue en masse to get PR over people who played by the rules.
Marc miller gave perfect reply to haters or manipulating people and we have some in this group tooo
well said.One thing I'd add to this great response:
> jump the queue en masse to get PR over people who played by the rules.
By and large, protected persons - who have already been reviewed and approved - did in fact play by the rules. Because these people faced great danger, the rules are deliberately flexible to ensure that they get protection while their claims are under review. They thus aren't jumping the queue either - these folks are already here and here to stay; it's just a kind of weird technicality that they aren't immediately recognized as PR or PR-equivalent and have to go through another process to obtain that (albeit a technicality with very real and painful consequences).
