Yes people who don’t meet the income requirements for 2016, 2017 and 2018 shouldn’t have applied in the first place and shouldn’t be encouraged to take a chance especially when they are thousands of dollars off LICO. Sure many share my opinion.
Unfortunately this was an attempt to taunt me after I asked
@nayr69sg to stop encouraging people who don’t meet the LICO for 2016/2017/2018 from continuing with their application. Their view is why not take a chance and just lose the application money where as I view it as a waste of taxpayer dollars and a delay for a real applicant.
Hey canuck78, don't be disappointed or upset as all of us those who know or are familiar with the process know that IRCC will not tolerate a cent shortage of the required income. But, there is a big but, people who is short of income and are very determine to try. They will submit their application with or without our comments. They did not come here to ask for our opinion but to gain our sympathy of what they are doing hence we can just empathy with them. I hope, after they get rejected, they should learn the lesson and be careful next time. Think of it like people who speeding, obviously knowing that is a violation of the law and risk being ticketed yet they still do. Will this waste police's time? Yes, it sure does but that is exactly the fine (or fees in the IRCC case) are there for.
During the pre-submission time (before Jan 28), I remember myself and lots of seniors in this sub forum have replied/warned "No, you should not" to all threads that asked something like "should I applied if I was just $100 short...", or "I just want to sponsor my mother as my father for sure did not want to go..." so and so... Apparently, it did not work and would not work now either.
Sometime, you just can't help it. What to do?